Panama: Offshore Pilot Quarterly - Commentary on Matters Offshore

Last Updated: 15 September 2005
Article by Derek Sambrook

Originally published September 2005

Bridges, Bombs and Bureaucrats

The second bridge to be built over the Panama Canal at a cost of $100,000 million, and called the Centenary Bridge, is a fine sight. It promises to contribute significantly to both the residential and commercial development of the former Canal Zone, once a fiefdom of the United States of America. The problem is that the gleaming new suspension bridge is close to an old US military weapons testing range which the Panamanian government says remains unsafe because the US military has failed to meet its obligation to clear the area of any potential unexploded bombs, mortar rounds and artillery shells. The presence of access roads and plans for low income housing near the Centenary Bridge makes the situation a precarious one and talks continue between both countries.

Building bridges and unexploded bombs – admittedly, of a different kind – can also apply to offshore financial planning when a person decides to traverse the divide between onshore and offshore. The hypothetical bridge that’s built between the two must be able to be crossed in safety and should be sturdy, not some flimsy foot bridge made of rope and likely to not stand the test of time. When I meet with potential clients I always remind them of how important it is to ensure that they satisfy themselves that any offshore structure put in place will not have any unintended, and unfortunate, consequences; that they don’t create, as it were, a mine field in which by taking a wrong step, they see their plans blow up in their faces.

It’s all about proper planning by people who know what they’re doing. Speaking of which, my remarks about onshore regulators in the March issue of the newsletter (under the heading: "Blind Men") drew supportive comments from some international practitioners. It was suggested, however, that the root of the problem, namely, a lack of practical experience, extended, in some cases, to offshore regulators as well. It’s fair comment and does not surprise me, particularly when often the choice of an offshore regulator does not rest in the hands of those competent to choose, but is dependent on the decision, perhaps, of a panel of bureaucrats with little understanding of the important issues. Such a situation can especially arise where the regulator’s jurisdiction is a dependency of a country in Europe.

Some onshore bureaucrats, in attempting to tackle offshore regulation, realise that they don’t know enough to make the right decisions but then take the illogical approach of either not seeking guidance or, if they do, failing to heed the advice given. It is, therefore, no surprise to me to read comments written by Jim Dougal who headed the European Union Commission’s office in Belfast between 1997 and 2002 and then became head of its United Kingdom representation from 2002 until 2004. Most readers of this newsletter appreciate the importance which the European Union has had (and continues to have) in shaping policy towards many of the major offshore financial services centres and so Mr. Dougal’s remarks are worth noting. He speaks of being "horrified and mystified" and to being exposed to the EU Commission’s "outrageous lack of common sense". Coincidentally, the Commission’s headquarters are in Brussels, capital of Belgium, and a city referred to by the English poet, Matthew Arnold, as "a cheerful, wicked little place". The American writer, Herman Melville, described Brussels thus: "a more dull, humdrum place I never saw". It seems to me that the EU Commission is ideally located.

Monarchs, Mandarins and Mess Ups

On King Charles Street in London, where the UK’s Foreign Office (which I used to visit on official business) is located, you will find statues of both King Charles I and Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell, a fine military leader, headed the uprising which eventually brought about the king’s downfall and his execution. Seneca said that the "foremost art of kings is the power to endure hatred". The Stuart monarch who firmly believed in the divine right of kings, lacked endurance but was able to mismanage the royal affairs so completely that his conflict with Parliament, and therefore Cromwell, brought about three civil wars. This reserved, stammering and self-righteous king had dissolved Parliament three times and at one point chose to rule without summoning Parliament for eleven years. Oliver Cromwell, a convert to a strong puritan faith that eschewed the ceremonial ostentation of the Catholic church would change all that. He came from the middle ranks of English society and was a force in Parliament where he represented the interests of the Puritans, middle class merchants and tradesmen. The King’s supporters, on the other hand, were the peasantry and the nobility.

The statues of both men on King Charles Street are reminders of Lord Palmerston’s view that a country has no permanent friends or enemies, only permanent interests. So do bureaucrats. Expediency is a given: today’s and tomorrow’s friends may not be the same people and the mandarins (named after the nine ranks of officials of the Chinese Empire) of Whitehall are masters of the game. They are the first to understand the usefulness, at given times, of both a ruler and a rebel, be they self-righteous sovereigns or puritanical parliamentarians. How right, then, for those statutes to be on King Charles Street where the civil servants readily appreciate the proverb of the fox and the hedgehog. It was used by the 7th century BC Greek poet, Archilochus, to illustrate how diverse traits can be of equal importance. Archilochus said that the fox devises many strategies; the hedgehog, however, knows one great and effective strategy. King Charles was most certainly a fox and Cromwell, (who would become Lord Protector of England, Scotland and Ireland), was a hedgehog. But, of course, Whitehall is not the exclusive territory of mandarins and, in various guises, along with their acolytes, they can be found in the ranks of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, as well as the EU Commission.

In the case of the Brussels-based bureaucracy, mandarins have found bureaucratic bliss. There are three main EU bodies: the European Council (representing governments); the European Commission (the executive arm that proposes legislation); and the European Parliament representing the peoples of the member states. So the Commission proposes laws which must be approved by the Council and Parliament. It is unlike any other form of government previously known and its uniqueness – and sometimes its obliqueness – leads to a mystique only pierced by the bureaucrats themselves. It should not be surprising, therefore, that the European Union Savings Tax Directive, which came into effect on 1st July this year, has created a stir in some offshore financial services centres. Bermuda was not affected when the directive came into force and Gibraltar was compliant except that the directive does not apply between itself and – believe it or not – the United Kingdom which has sovereignty over Gibraltar. Now, there are blunders and there are blunders. Those of the instant, spontaneous kind can perhaps be more readily forgiven, such as when, in 1998, a Salomon Brothers trader leant an elbow on a computer keyboard which activated an order to sell around US$1 billion’s worth of French government-bond futures; or, more recently, when a trader at a bank keyed in the wrong number of shares on his trading screen with the result that a sell order for a basket of shares worth around US$50 million was changed into one valued ten times that. The London stock exchange saw the FTSE 100 index plunge by 2.2% in the final moments of trading on that particular day. In the case of the European Commission, however, it has had five years of planning to get it right and slips by fingers or elbows cannot be blamed for the Bermuda and Gibraltar mess.

The directive, in some instances, forces offshore financial services centres to disclose details of certain types of income an EU national has earned to the tax authority in the EU country in which he resides, or deduct a retention tax. The directive does not affect persons who are resident in the offshore jurisdiction, nor those who are not resident in any one of the 25 EU countries. It was intended to also extend to dependencies of one or more of the 25 EU countries and the British government has found itself in a spot. The blunder, once realised, caused a cornucopia of contentious issues to be raised – especially by some of the other leading offshore jurisdictions already foaming at the mouth over having to comply. Bermuda is the only British dependent territory (Gibraltar is a Crown dependency enjoying more legislative freedom) that was not included in the directive. How did its name disappear from the list? Was this the work of the Bermuda triangle? It may take time, but Bermuda can be sure that the issue will be something that doesn’t disappear. The same goes for Gibraltar.

That Magnificent Seven

This month the annual Catholic feast day known as the Seven Sorrows of Our Lady is celebrated. Its purpose is to reflect on the sadness endured by the Virgin Mary because of the suffering and death of her Divine Son. Not just sorrows, it seems, come in sevens. The offshore financial services industry was told by the OECD at its meeting in Switzerland in May, 1998, of its grand design to stamp out tax havens within seven years. You will have noticed that the deadline has recently expired and that most of the so-called tax havens are alive and well – and prospering. Offshore private banking – a main ingredient of offshore services – certainly seems set to grow with one research source estimating that more than 8.3 million people worldwide had over $1 million in financial assets in 2004. This is an increase of (here comes that numeral again) 7 per cent over 2003 and doubtless a number of those millionaires will be looking for investments and strategies beyond their domestic markets. You might ask why the OECD decided to set a target of seven years. It would be a mistake to automatically assume that it followed a period of considering the logistics and practicalities of the objective. Proper planning, in other words. It was probably chosen for the same reason that many of us are drawn to that special number. What brought about this septimal obsession has its roots over 40 centuries ago in Sumeria (once part of Mesopotamia) which was conquered by Sargon I, King of Akkad, who instituted the first ever recorded seven-day week. Actually, we owe not only the week to the Sumerians but also the 60-minute hour. Subsequently, Babylonians, Greeks and Romans adopted the seven-day week; Europe and the Americas were to follow. The week reached India from Mesopotamia more than 2,000 years ago and about 1,000 years later, even China capitulated. Seven was significant for the Sumerians because they worshipped seven gods that could be seen in the sky and they decided to name the days of the week for these heavenly bodies. Today we know these gods as Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus and Saturn. The future of the OECD’s grand design to stifle tax havens is in the lap of the gods, but one thing is for sure: that organisation is at sixes and sevens over how to achieve its goal. War of the Worlds Panama’s railway, inaugurated in 1855, is celebrating its 150th anniversary. A lot has changed since Mark Twain, who travelled on the railway, wrote an article for the Chicago Republican in 1868. He described his train journey across Panama and how he spent two or three hours travelling through "a tangled wilderness of tropical vegetation". The hapless Jim Dougal, who abandoned the EU Commission, spent seven years negotiating a tangled wilderness in the byzantine, bureaucratic depths of the EU headquarters before his journey came to an end. Even he succumbed to the number seven after coming unstuck mainly because of a poor communication system, smothering rules and incompetence. As an ex-regulator myself I can sympathise with him.

Much like the EU Commission, the OECD has similar problems. It has often been too ambitious and has suffered from failures of grand design, two subjects that not only Oliver Cromwell and King Charles I understood, but also Adam Smith and Macbeth. One sometimes feels that the OECD’s offshore tax campaign is built on the scepticism of Adam Smith. In Wealth of Nations he wrote: "Commerce sinks the courage of mankind. The minds of men are contracted, and rendered incapable of elevation". Honoré de Belzac, however, said that bureaucracy was a giant mechanism operated by pygmies: surely, then, that’s where you would find an abundance of "contracted minds" and a scarcity of elevation? There is no doubt that a war of the worlds is raging. One world is onshore and the other is offshore, but it is nothing like the war that H. G. Wells wrote about. I suspect that H. G. Wells would have had some sympathy for those combatants offshore and, certainly, no mandarin would have agreed with his sentiment that in politics the best way to play your cards is to lay them face upwards on the table. Who will be triumphant and how the OECD tax and other anti-offshore initiatives will end is not known.

In 1660, eleven years after the execution of his father and with Cromwell no more, Charles II ascended the throne and The Restoration was complete. The poet, John Dryden, described the son’s reign as "a very merry, dancing, drinking, laughing, quaffing and unthinking time". Another Charles is waiting in the wings today to assume the British throne. But just as things have changed for monarchs, so they have for money managers – particularly those offshore. There will be no Restoration for either and the merry times of the past have gone forever.

Offshore Pilot Quarterly has been published since 1997 by Trust Services, S. A. which is a British- managed trust company licensed under the fiduciary laws of Panama. It is written by Derek Sambrook, our Managing Director, who is a former member of the Latin America and Caribbean Banking Commission as well as a former offshore banking, trust company and insurance regulator. He has over 35 years private and public sector experience in the financial services industry. Our website provides a broad range of related essays. Engaging an offshore representative is an important decision and we advise all persons to seek appropriate legal and tax advice from professionals licensed to render such advice before making offshore commitments.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions