United States: Nautilus Insurance Company v. Access Medical, LLC at el

(September 2019) - In Nautilus Ins. Co. v. Access Medical, LLC at el,______ F.3d __________ (9th Cir. July 2, 2019), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit certified the following question to the Nevada Supreme Court based on the absence of any Nevada law addressing whether an insurer may seek reimbursement of defense costs incurred in connection with an uncovered claim:

Is an insurer entitled to reimbursement of costs already expended in defense of its insured where a determination has been made that the insurer owed no duty to defend and the insurer expressly reserved its right to seek reimbursement in writing after defense has been tendered but where the insurance policy contains no reservation of rights?

The question relates to a lawsuit filed by Nautilus Insurance Company ("Nautilus") against its insured, Access Medical, LLC, seeking a declaration that potential coverage was not afforded under its policy in connection with an underlying cross-complaint alleging 31 claims, including a claim for interference with prospective economic advantage because of Access Medical, LLC’s ("Access") alleged interference with relationships with hospitals with which cross-complainant, Ted Switzer, enjoyed long-standing and mutually beneficial relationships. Switzer alleged that Access “acted to disrupt the relationship between Switzer and various hospitals, and engaged in wrongful acts which resulted in injury to the personal business reputation of Switzer. Such wrongful acts caused various vendors to stop using Switzer's business and to use Access instead.”

Access tendered the defense of the Switzer cross-complaint to Nautilus contending that the cause of action for interference with prospective economic advantage “triggered personal and advertising injury” coverage under the Nautilus policy, i.e., defamation and disparagement. In response, Nautilus agreed to defend Access against the Switzer cross-complaint subject to a reservation of rights to file a declaratory relief action establishing that potential coverage was not afforded under its policy and to recover all defense costs incurred in defending Access against the Switzer cross-complaint. Nautilus issued four different letters to Access advising that it intended to seek reimbursement of defense costs incurred in connection with defending Access against the Switzer cross-complaint.

Subsequently, on February 24, 2015, Nautilus filed a declaratory relief action in Nevada United States District Court arguing that it never had a duty to defend or indemnify Access. Nautilus filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that potential coverage was not afforded under its policy for the Switzer cross-complaint. The district court granted such motion. However, neither the Nautilus complaint, nor the motion for summary judgment requested reimbursement of defense costs incurred by Nautilus on behalf of Access in connection with the Switzer cross-complaint.

Nautilus then brought a motion for relief seeking reimbursement of defense costs incurred in defending Access in the Switzer cross-complaint. In response, Access filed a motion for reconsideration arguing that Nautilus had a duty to defend Access against the Switzer cross-complaint. The district court denied both motions in the same order. On the reimbursement issue, the district court concluded Nautilus was not entitled to further relief because:

  1. Nautilus did not include a claim for reimbursement of damages in its complaint;
  2. Nautilus did not show it was entitled to relief as a matter of law; and
  3. Nautilus did not establish it was entitled to reimbursement under Nevada law.

On appeal, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's determination that Nautilus did not owe a duty to defend Access and reserved judgment on whether Nautilus could seek further relief under 28 U.S.C. Section 2202 with respect to its claim for reimbursement of defense costs.

The Court of Appeals determined that Nevada state courts do not appear to have addressed directly the issue of reimbursement of defense costs. In certifying the question of reimbursement to the Nevada Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals noted as follows:

“Our understanding of Nevada law is that a reservation of rights letter can generally be valid. See, Havas v. Atl. Ins. Co., 614 P.2d 1, 1 (Nev. 1980) (per curiam) (insurer “agreed to investigate validity of the claim while specifically reserving all defenses available to it”). The federal district court in Nevada determined that insurers have a right to reimbursement if there is an “understanding” between the parties that the insured would be required to reimburse costs if it is later determined that the insurer had no duty to defend. Capitol Indem., Corp. v. Blazer, 51 F.Supp. 2d 1080, 1090 (D. Nev. 1999). This understanding can exist outside the terms of the policy. For example, acceptance of money from the insurer can constitute an implied agreement to the reservation of rights. Probuilders Specialty Ins. Co., 116 F. Supp. 3d at 1182.

Here, Nautilus advised Insureds on at least four occasions that it was reserving all rights, including the right to seek reimbursement. In each of the letters sent to Insureds, Nautilus stated that it “further reserves the right to seek reimbursement for any and all attorney fees, expert fees, defense costs, indemnification payments, and any other litigation-related expenses that it pays in connection with its defense and indemnification.”

To be sure, several courts have held that a unilateral reservation of rights letters cannot itself create rights not contained in the policy. See, e.g., Shoshone First Bank v. Pac. Emp’rs Ins. Co., 2 P.3d 510, 515-16 (Wyo. 2000) (opting to follow minority rule that insurer cannot recover defense costs because “insurer is not permitted to unilaterally modify and change policy coverage”). The Illinois Supreme Court explained the difference between the majority and minority rules:

In general then, the decisions finding that an insurer is entitled to reimbursement of defense costs are based upon a finding that there was a contract implied in fact or law, or a finding that the insured was unjustly enriched when its insurer paid defense cots for claims that were not covered by the insured’s policy.

Gen. Agents Ins. Co. of Am. V. Midwest Sporting Goods Co., 828 N.E.2d 1092, 1101 (I11.2005). In adopting the minority rule, the Illinois Supreme Court explained that in paying defense costs pursuant to a reservation of rights:

[T]he insurer is protecting itself at least as much as it is protecting its insured. Thus, we cannot say that an insured is unjustly enriched when its insurer tenders a defense in order to protect its own interests, even if it is later determined that the insurer did not owe a defense.

Id. at 1103.

Courts that follow the majority rule, however state that it is in the best interest of both parties to allow insurers to recoup their defense costs under a reservation of rights. “Without a right of reimbursement, an insurer might be tempted to refuse to defend an insurer might be tempted to refuse to defend an action with many claims that are not even potentially covered and only a few that are-lest the insurer give, and the insured get, more than they agreed.” Buss. V. Superior Court, 939 P.2d 766, 778 (Cal. 1997).

We understand that “[w]here Nevada law is lacking, its courts have looked to the law of other jurisdictions, particularly California, for guidance.” Eichacker v. Paul Reverse Life Ins. Co., 354 F.3d 1142, 1145 (9th Cir. 2004) (internal quotation marks omitted). Under California law, “the insurer can reserve its right of reimbursement for defense costs by itself, without the insured’s agreement.” Buss, 939 P.2d at 784 n.27. “If that conclusion is reached, the insurer, having reserved its right, may recover from its insured the costs it expended to provide a defense, which, under its contract of insurance, it was never obligated to furnish.” Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. MV Transp., 115 P.3d 460, 468 (Cal.2005).

Because the Nevada Supreme Court has not spoken directly on the issue of an insurer’s entitlement to reimbursement of defense costs under a reservation of rights and because such issues involve matters of state law and policy best resolved by the highest court of Nevada, certification of a question to the Nevada Supreme Court is appropriate. We recognize that “[t]he written opinion of the Supreme Court stating the law governing the questions certified… shall be res judicata as to the parties.” Nev. R. App. P. 5(h).”

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions