United States: Around The World And Back: Making A Champion Out Of Your Design With International Design Rights

The rights encompassing designs are as numerous as the number of designs in the world. As Paul Rand eloquently stated above, obtaining a design right may seem straightforward at first glance; however, depending on your client’s goals, the process can be complicated. One must consider both whether the right should be obtained and where the design should be protected. This article will discuss these considerations and analyze the major regimes for protecting designs.

Should Design Rights Be Obtained?

The first consideration is whether a design patent should be obtained for a particular design. Generally, if the design is unique or has unique aspects, then the owner of the design should seek protection for it to prevent copying by others or close mimicry.1 Further, design rights will only protect the way an object looks, not how it functions.2 As a result, while design patents themselves may be limited in protection, they are a valuable piece of a comprehensive intellectual property portfolio.

In many cases, design patents will issue or receive a final office action in 19 months.3 In contrast, it takes around 24 months for a utility patent to issue or receive a final office action.4  While the length of time for utility and design patents to issue or receive a final office action differs, applicants may apply for both types when their inventions contain both visual and functional features. For example, Columbia Sportswear obtained the following patents for its Omni-Heat products: U.S. Patent No. 8,453,270 (the ’270 patent); U.S. Patent No. 8,424,119 (the ’119 patent); and U.S. Design Patent No. D657,903 (the ’903 design patent). Specifically, the utility patents claimed a heat management material coupled to a base material in order to direct and maintain body heat. The design patent, however, protected the wavy fabric pattern found in different articles, such as the lining of the jacket.

Obtaining utility and design patents related to the Omni-Heat products paid off for Columbia in at least three ways when it filed a patent infringement suit in January 2015 against Seirus Innovative Techniques.5 First, on summary judgment, the court found the patented design and the accused products were strikingly similar. As a result, the court held that Seirus infringed the ’903 design patent.6

Second, after trial, the jury found that the ’270 patent was invalid because it was anticipated by the prior art and obvious.7 And the ’119 patent was dropped from the suit the evening before the trial began.8 However, the court upheld the validity of the ’903 design patent.9

Third, the jury awarded Columbia over $3.4 million in damages ($3,018,174 for the total profit from Seirus’s sales of the infringing product and $435,175 as a reasonable royalty).10 As the Columbia case illustrates, compared to utility patents, there is a greater chance of recovering more money damages with a design patent, because the owner may recover for total profits on sales of a product incorporating the infringed design.11 The infringer’s total profits are based on the specific article of manufacture embodying the claimed design, so the calculations may involve the complete infringing product or only a component of it.12 In comparison, an owner of a utility patent can only recover damages in the form of a reasonable royalty or lost profits.13

Design patents can also be used to market goods and deter competitors.14 For example, once a design patent application has been filed, the applicant can mark a product that employs the design with “patent pending.” The “patent pending” label tells consumers and retail buyers that the product’s design is unique and not offered by any competitors.15 It also signifies that the owners of the pending design patent application are not only innovative, but also serious about protecting and investing in their design.16 Filing a design patent may also cause competitors to doubt their marketing and product development strategies. Because design patents are only published and made available to the public upon issuance,17 competitors will not know what elements of the design will be protected until issuance. As a result, competitors are forced to weigh the potential profits of developing a competing product against the costs of wasted product development and the potential for litigation if the competitor’s new product is preempted by an issued design patent.18 Therefore, in some circumstances, it has been suggested that the “patent pending” label may be more effective in the applicant’s business than the issued patent.19

Where Design Rights Protection Should Be Obtained

The Hague Agreement

Through the Hague Agreement, design owners are able to obtain protection of their designs in several countries.20 The Hague Agreement is “a system for the international registration of industrial designs” and is administered by the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in Geneva, Switzerland.21 Under the Hague Agreement, an owner of a design may choose to have it protected in the territories of all countries party to the Hague Agreement (contracting parties) by filing one application, in one language, and with one set of currency.22 There are currently 70 parties to the Hague Agreement.23 Significantly, the United States became a party to the Hague Agreement in 2015, and the United Kingdom joined on June 13, 2018.24 Other prominent contracting parties include the European Union (EU), Russia, Canada, South Korea, and Japan.25

To file an international design application (IDA) under the Hague Agreement, the applicant must have a domicile in the territory of a contracting party (or meet one of the other categories for entitlement).26 The application must include: the applicant’s name, figures, an indication of the product with a Locarno classification,27 and the number of designs and embodiments.28 In addition, applicants must ensure their IDA meets the specific requirements for each country in which they are seeking design protection. For example, the United States requires an oath or declaration from the inventor(s).

Analysis of Design Protection Regimes

Most countries have a mechanism in place to protect designs and utility patents under their national laws. However, the systems to protect both utility patents and designs vary by the depth of review, the time period to receive protection, and the scope of protection. This section analyzes three regimes to specifically obtain design rights: examination, registration, and hybrid systems. Individual country rules are also discussed to illustrate each system.

Examination System

Under an examination system, design applications are first reviewed to determine whether they comply with procedural requirements and then substantively reviewed to determine whether the design is novel, original, and clearly disclosed in the figures.29 It takes longer for a design patent to issue under an examination system30 compared to a registration system.31

In the United States, a design patent protects a new, original, and ornamental design for an article of manufacture32 and can protect either the entire article of manufacture or a component of that article.33 Significantly, the rules applicable for utility patents apply to design patents as well, unless otherwise specified.34 Once the application is filed, on average, it will receive a first office action 13 months into the examination process35 and receive a final office action or issue as a patent in 19 months.36 Because the United States recently entered into the Hague Agreement, the term length of a design patent has been extended. If the design patent application was filed on or after May 13, 2015, then the design patent will last for 15 years after issuance.37 If the application was filed before May 13, 2015, then the issued design patent will have a 14-year term.38 Once issued, a design patent requires no maintenance fee or annuity.39

Japan is another country where design applications undergo substantive examination. Under the Japanese Design Act, a design is “the shape, patterns or colors, or any combination thereof, of an article . . . which creates an aesthetic impression through the eye.”40 By limiting where the aesthetic impression can be created, the Japanese Design Act narrows the definition of a design in comparison to the United States. In the United States, to be patentable, a design must be a new, original, and ornamental article of manufacture.41 The United States design patent statute does not say how the design must be perceived, while Japan specifies that the impression must be created through the eye. For instance, under traditional Japanese design law, integrated circuit chip designs and other small designs cannot be protected, because they can only be viewed through a microscope and do not create an aesthetic impression.42 This quirk in the design system caused Japan to pass the Act on the Circuit Layout of a Semiconductor Integrated Circuits.43 The Japanese Design Act also prevents designs injuring public order or morality.44

On June 9, 2018, Japan enacted legislation extending the grace period45 for public disclosure of designs from six months to one year.46 Once a Japanese design is registered it will be protected for 20 years.47 However, unlike the United States, an annual fee must be paid to maintain the design.48

Registration System

Under a registration system, an application is reviewed for completeness.49 An analysis of the figures is also conducted to determine whether they all depict an article of the same class.50  Figures in different classes cannot be presented in a single application, such as figures showing a lamp and other figures showing a refrigerator.51

In the EU, applicants have two options: they can either register a design with the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and obtain a registered Community design (RCD) or commercialize it without registration by relying on an unregistered Community design right (UCD).52 While both options provide design protection, they differ in several key ways. RCDs and UCDs both provide protection against the following: manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, marketing, importing, or exporting a product incorporating a protected design without the consent of its owner.53 RCDs last five years from the filing date and can be renewed periodically for up to a total of 25 years; UCDs only last three years and cannot be extended.54  RCDs and UCDs also differ in terms of protectable scope. An RCD protects a registered design against similar designs, even when the infringing design was made in good faith. However, to enforce a UCD, an infringer must intentionally copy the UCD.55 Further, the UCD’s first disclosure must be in the EU to trigger the enforcement right.56

Unlike the EU, China does not protect unregistered designs.57 Instead, designs must be registered as patents.58 China’s system provides protection for 10 years and allows for products with different functions and identical appearances to be protected in the same design patent application.59 This allows, for example, smartphone manufacturers to protect multiple generations of smartphones with the same design. China also has an absolute novelty requirement for its design patents.60 The absolute novelty requirement means that any disclosure of the design, through sales, advertising, or any other means, throughout the world before filing the Chinese design patent application prevents an applicant from obtaining a design patent.61 But, if a prior design patent application (disclosing the same design) was filed in a country that is a party to the Paris Convention, then the applicant may claim the early application’s priority date for the Chinese design patent application.62

Hybrid System

Hybrid systems incorporate features from both registration and examination systems.63 For example, in Australia and Brazil, designs first follow a registration process.64 However, before the registered design can be enforced, an optional examination process must be completed.65  The hybrid system is therefore optimal for companies that would like to obtain a registration right away but also have the option to examine their registration later, if needed.

Australian design law first requires absolute novelty of a design.66 It not only must be new and distinctive, but also cannot have been published anywhere in the world or publicly used in Australia before the application (either in Australia itself or in a Paris Convention country through a claim of priority).67 Australia also has both a registration and certification stage. The registration stage occurs first. A design is considered registered when it passes a formalities check.68 Once the design is registered, it will be protected for five years from the application filing date and can be renewed for an additional five-year period.69 If the design is not renewed, it then goes into the public domain.70 Registered design holders also have the following rights: (1) protection for the visual appearance of the object; and (2) exclusive rights to use, license, or sell the design commercially.71

Notably, passing the registration stage alone does not allow owners to legally enforce their design. To enforce designs against infringers, the applicant must request that the design proceed to the second step, certification of the design.72 To be certified, the design must be new and distinctive, as discussed above.73 Because Australia does not have a grace period for public disclosure of designs,74 even applicants’ “own earlier design can prevent [them] from protecting a later design.”75 In other words, if anyone, including the design owner, publishes a design before filing the corresponding Australian design application (or the priority application), the publication will be considered prior art.76

Choosing Where to File

With the above analysis in mind, determining where to obtain design protection is complex. Applicants need to consider where the product is made and where their competitors are located. It may be a waste of money to obtain a design patent in the United States, for example, if the product is sold only in Japan and the main competitor is located in Japan. It may also be important to protect designs in the country where they are manufactured, in addition to where they are sold.77 By doing so, competitors will be prevented from selling infringing competing designs and manufacturers will not be able to make the protected design and sell it to another distributor.

Finally, the individual countries’ requirements must be taken into consideration. As seen above, design protections are territorial and dependent on national design laws. Not only does the length of protection differ between countries, but also the requirements needed to have a complete design application. Some countries will reject an application for disclosures of the design even outside the country, while others have grace periods to file an application if a disclosure was made anywhere in the world.

For example, in the United States, a public disclosure is not considered prior art if it was made by the designer within one year before the application was filed.78 However, EU disclosure laws are trickier to analyze. RCDs have a one-year grace period for a disclosure made anywhere in the world, similar to the United States.79 Therefore, an application that starts as an unregistered design could enjoy the benefit of the grace period if the applicant intends to file an RCD by the end of the grace period. However, it is “not possible to have the full 3 years of protection as [a UCD] and then to file an application for [an RCD], as the novelty requirement will not then have been met.”80 Savvy design law attorneys will take these discrepancies into account to maximize the number of jurisdictions where the design can be protected.


Unlike beauty, design patents are not only skin deep. Instead, they require a mastery of several competing systems and countries’ laws. An applicant’s needs and budget should be carefully considered to best determine where they should obtain design patents and enforce their rights.


Why Design Protection?,Swedish Pat. & Registration Off.,https://www.prv.se/en/designs/why-design-protection/(last visited Dec. 11, 2018).


3Design Traditional Total Pendency,U.S. Pat. & Trademark Off.,https://www.uspto.gov/corda/dashboards/patents/main.dashxml?CTNAVID=1006(last visited Dec. 11, 2018).

4October 2018 Patents Data, at a Glance,U.S. Pat. & Trademark Off.,https://www.uspto.gov/dashboards/patents/main.dashxml(last visited Dec. 11, 2018) (showing that the exact time period is 23.9 months).

5 Columbia Sportswear N. Am., Inc. v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc., No. 3:17-cv-01781-HZ (S.D. Cal. 2017). The case was originally filed in the District of Oregon, and then later transferred to the Southern District of California. Columbia Sportswear N. Am., Inc. v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc., No. 3:15-cv-00064 (D. Or. Sept. 5, 2017), ECF No. 259.

6Columbia Sportswear, No. 3:15-cv-00064 (D. Or. Aug. 10, 2016), ECF No. 105 (addressing only the validity of the design patent), appeal docketed, No. 18-1329 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 20, 2017).

7 Jury Verdict,Columbia Sportswear, No. 3:17-cv-01781-HZ (S.D. Cal. Sept. 29, 2017), ECF No. 377.

8See id.

9Id.The validity of both design and utility patents are governed by 35 U.S.C. § 103, among other provisions. Under § 103, an invention or design is obvious if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art would have been obvious to a person having skill in the art, Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966), or to an ordinary designer,In reRosen, 673 F.2d 388 (C.C.P.A. 1982). However, design patents have a different framework for implementing this test. First, the court must find a primary reference with design characteristics that are basically the same as the claimed design. Durling v. Spectrum Furniture Co., 101 F.3d 100, 103 (Fed. Cir. 1996);see alsoApple, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd., 678 F.3d 1314, 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2012).Under this step, the court needs to “(1) discern the correct visual impression created by the patented design as a whole; and (2) determine whether there is a single reference that creates ‘basically the same’ visual impression.”Durling, 101 F.3d at 103. Second, once a primary reference is found, other references may be used to modify it to create a design with the same overall visual impression as the claimed invention if the secondary references are “so related [to the primary reference] that the appearance of certain ornamental features in one would suggest the application of those features to the other.”In reBorden, 90 F.3d 1570, 1575 (Fed. Cir. 1996).

10 Jury Verdict,supranote 7.

11 35 U.S.C. § 289.

12SeeSamsung Elecs. Co., Ltd. v. Apple Inc., 137 S. Ct. 429 (2016).

13 35 U.S.C. § 284.

14 Russ Krajec,Advertising and Marketing Uses for Patents and the Deterrent Factor,Anything under Sun Made by Man,https://krajec.com/advertising-and-marketing-uses-for-patents-and-the-deterrent-factor/(last visited Dec. 11, 2018).


16 Christopher Heer et al.,The Benefits of Use of “Patent Pending,Heer L.,https://www.heerlaw.com/benefits-patent-pending(last updated Oct. 8, 2018).

17 Elizabeth D. Ferrill & Elizabeth A. Shah,The Hidden World of Design Patent Prosecution,Finnegan: Our Insights(Dec. 3, 2015),https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/the-hidden-world-of-design-patent-prosecution.html.

18 Krajec,supranote 14.


20FAQ on the Hague Agreement,Eur. Union Intell. Prop. Off.,https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/faq-on-the-hague-agreement(last updated Apr. 18, 2018).


22Id.(explaining that the currency used is Swiss francs).

23Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs: Status,WIPO,http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/treaties/en/documents/pdf/hague.pdf(last updated Nov. 9, 2018).



26How to File Your Application: Entitlement,World Intell. Prop. Org.,http://www.wipo.int/hague/en/how_to/file/entitlement.html(last visited Dec. 11, 2018). To be entitled to file an IDA, an applicant must satisfy at least one of the following conditions (entitlements): (1) be a national of a contracting party; (2) be a national of a member state of an intergovernmental organization that is a contracting party (such as the EU or the African Intellectual Property Organization); (3) have a domicile in the territory of a contracting party; (4) have a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in the territory of a contracting party, or only under the 1999 Geneva Act; or (5) have a habitual residence in a contracting party.

27Locarno Classification,World Intell. Prop. Org.,http://www.wipo.int/classifications/locarno/en/(last visited Dec. 11, 2018) (defining Locarno classification as an international classification used to register international designs).

28 Brent Dougal,Hague—A New Consideration for US Design Applications,Law360(May 12, 2015),https://www.knobbe.com/sites/default/files/Hague%20%E2%80%94%20A%20New%20Consideration%20For%20US%20Design%20Applications.pdf.

29 Elizabeth D. Ferrill,Selling Globally? Protect Locally—Strategic Planning for Design Rights Worldwide,Full Disclosure(Jan. 2015),https://www.finnegan.com/files/Upload/Newsletters/Full_Disclosure/2015/January/FullDisclosure_Jan15_4.html.

30 Vic Lin,What Is a Design Patent?,Pat. Trademark Blog,http://www.patenttrademarkblog.com/design-patent/(last visited Dec. 11, 2018) (noting that the overall pendency of design applications in the United States is 20 months).

31See Frequently Asked Questions,Mewburn Ellis,http://mewburn.com/resource/frequently-asked-questions(last visited Dec. 11, 2018) (“Registration of a registered Community design[] can be very fast—perhaps even as quick asone week.” (emphasis added)).

32 35 U.S.C. § 171.

33 Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd. v. Apple Inc., 137 S. Ct. 429, 435 (2016) (“So understood, the term ‘article of manufacture’ is broad enough to encompass both a product sold to a consumer as well as a component of that product.”).

34 35 U.S.C. § 171(b).

35Design First Office Action Pendency,U.S. Pat. & Trademark Off.,https://www.uspto.gov/corda/dashboards/patents/main.dashxml?CTNAVID=1006(last visited Dec. 11, 2018) (showing that the exact time to receive a first office action is 13.3 months).

36See Design Traditional Total Pendency,supranote 3.

37See35 U.S.C. § 173;U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP)§ 1505 (9th ed. Rev. 08.2017, Jan. 2018).

38MPEP,supranote 37, § 1505.

39 37 C.F.R. § 1.362(b).

40 Ish-oh-o [Design Act], Law No. 125 of 1959, art. 2(1), translated in (Japanese Law Translation [JLT DS]),http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=44&vm=04&re=02(Japan).

41 35 U.S.C. § 171.

42 Yoichiro Yamaguchi,Japanese Design Law and Practice, 19Balt. L. Rev.417, 420 (1989).

43 Handōtai shūseki kairo no kairo haichi ni kansuru hōritsu [Act on the Circuit Layout of a Semiconductor Integrated Circuits], Law No. 43 of 1985, §§ 2–3, translated in (Japanese Law Translation [JLT DS]), http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=1841&vm=04&re=01 (Japan).

44 Design Act,supranote 40, at art. 5(i).

45 A grace period allows applicants to file patent or design applications within a certain time (usually six to 12 months) after publicizing the invention and not have the previous disclosure be considered prior art to their applications. Specific details about grace period lengths and disclosures to which the grace period applies vary by country.See Grace Periods for Disclosure of an Invention before Applying for a Patent,Mewburn Ellis,http://mewburn.com/resource/grace-periods-for-disclosure-of-an-invention-before-applying-for-a-patent/(last visited Dec. 11, 2018).

46 Jonathan Osha & Shinya Kimura,Japanese Grace Period Will Be Extended to 12 Months,Osha Liang LLP(June 1, 2018),https://oshaliang.com/newsletter/japanese-grace-period-will-be-extended-to-12-months/.

475.7 Protection of Designs,Japan External Trade Org.,https://www.jetro.go.jp/en/invest/setting_up/section5/page7.html(last visited Dec. 11, 2018).


49 Ferrill,supranote 29 (explaining that completeness of an application occurs when “the application states it has five figures and five figures have been filed”).


51See, e.g.,Locarno Publication,World Intell. Prop. Org.,http://www.wipo.int/classifications/locarno/locpub/en/fr/(last visited Dec. 11, 2018) (illustrating that lamps are found in class 26 while refrigerators are in class 15).

52Designs in the European Union,Eur. Union Intell. Prop. Off.,https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/designs-in-the-european-union(last updated Feb. 19, 2016).




56Unregistered Community Design—Copyright-Like Protection against Copying in Europe,Heinonen(Apr. 16, 2014),http://heinonen.com/en/current/unregistered-community-design-copyright-like-protection-against-copying-in-europe/(“In order to get protection, an UCD must be disclosed in order to become reasonably known to the relevant circles in the European Union.”).

57 Helika Jurgenson,Design Patents and Utility Models in China: Know before You Go,Your IP Insider(July 6, 2017),http://www.youripinsider.eu/design-patents-utility-models-china/.



60See Zhōnghuá Rénmín Gònghéguó Zhuānlì Fă [Patent Law of the People’s Republic of China] (promulgated by the Standing Comm. Nat’l People’s Cong., Mar. 12, 1984, effective Apr. 1, 1985), art. 23 (“Any design for which patent right may be granted must not be identical with or similar to any design which, before the date of filing, has been publicly disclosed in publications in the country or abroad or has been publicly used in the country, and must not collide with any legal prior rights obtained by any other person.”).

61See id.

62 Dan Harris,China Design Patents: The Info We Need,China L. Blog(June 9, 2018),https://www.chinalawblog.com/2018/06/china-design-patents-the-info-we-need.html.

63 Ferrill,supranote 29.



66Don’t Publicise Your Design,IP Austl.,https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/designs/applying-design/dont-publicise-your-design(last updated Mar. 1, 2016).


68Registration and Certification,IP Austl.,https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/designs/understanding-designs/registration-and-certification(last updated Mar. 3, 2016).





73Don’t Publicise Your Design,supranote 66.

74  Michelle Lee & Edward Genocchio,Ensuring Valid Protection of Your Design in Australia,Spruson & Ferguson(Sept. 11, 2017),https://www.spruson.com/ensuring-valid-protection-of-your-design-australia.

75Registration and Certification,supranote 68.

76 Lee & Genocchio,supranote 74.

77See How Do I Protect My Registered Design Globally?,IP Foundry,https://ipfoundry.io/how-do-i-protect-my-registered-design-globally/(last updated Jan. 17, 2018).

78.SeeMPEP,supranote 37, § 1504.

79Basic Questions,Eur. Union Intell. Prop. Off.,https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/cd-general-questions(last updated Apr. 18, 2018).

80Unregistered Community Design,Eur. Union Intell. Prop. Off., https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/unregistered-community-design(last updated May 11, 2018).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
7 May 2019, Speaking Engagement, Palo Alto, United States

Finnegan is a Gold sponsor of IP Counsel Café. Finnegan partner Jacob Schroeder will join the panel discussion “IPR & Litigation Strategy.”

16 Jun 2019, Other, Washington, DC, United States

Finnegan is a Gold sponsor of IAM Magazine’s IPBC Global. The program will take place at the Westin Waterfront in Boston, Massachusetts.

8 Jul 2019, Other, Washington, DC, United States

The program will take place at McGill University in Montréal, Canada.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions