United States: Federal Circuit Reins In Early Dismissals Based On Patent Liabilities

Last Updated: April 6 2018
Article by D. Stuart Bartow

In a span of less than a week in February, the Federal Circuit issued two precedential decisions that may impact the willingness of district courts to resolve patent eligibility issues on early motions.

First, on February 8, 2018, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Berkheimer v. HP, Inc., vacating a district court's summary judgment determination that several claims of the single patent-in-suit were patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The following week, on February 14, 2018, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Aatrix Software, Inc. v. Green Shades Software, Inc., and vacated a district court dismissal of several claims of two patents-in-suit on § 101 ineligibility grounds. These two opinions may reveal the beginning of a trend at the Federal Circuit in which greater consideration may be given to allegations pleaded in a patentee's infringement complaint, making it more difficult to invalidate claims at the motion to dismiss and/or summary judgment stages of an infringement lawsuit.

For several years now, some judges at the Federal Circuit have expressed concern at the procedural ease with which patent claims have been invalidated on § 101 grounds in the wake of the Supreme Court's Alice decision. In some instances, those judges have expressed concern that insufficient deference has been shown to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and in particular the rules governing motions to dismiss, motions for judgment on the pleadings, and motions for summary judgment. Several earlier decisions authored by Judge Moore, including Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. LG Electronics, Inc., No. 16-2684 (Jan. 25, 2018) and Thales Visionix Inc. v. U.S., No. 15-5150 (Mar. 8, 2017), reveal the related concern that in many § 101 analyses, district courts are ignoring recited, specific and non-abstract technological improvements over disclosed prior art.

The Berkheimer and Aatrix Software decisions may reflect a movement on the Federal Circuit to recognize that early disposition on § 101 grounds may be premature in many cases. The details of the two cases are discussed below. Although the Berkheimer panel took pains to point out that "nothing in this this decision should be viewed as casting doubt on the propriety of [earlier cases finding ineligibility at the motion to dismiss or summary judgment stage,]" it seems plausible that the Federal Circuit is going to stress a more rigorous and conservative approach by district courts in the future when ruling on such early-stage § 101 motions.

Berkheimer v. HP, Inc. (Circuit Judges Moore*, Taranto, Stoll), No. 17-1437, Feb. 8, 2018:

The Berkheimer case involved U.S. Patent No. 7,447,713, which in general terms is directed to "digitally processing and archiving files in a digital management system." The district court held on summary judgment—after construing several claim terms—that at Alice/Mayo Step 1, the asserted claims were merely directed to the abstract idea of "using a generic computer to collect, organize, compare, and present data for reconciliation prior to archiving." The district court held that at Alice/Mayo Step 2, there was no inventive concept recited in the claims sufficient to yield patent eligible subject matter.

In an opinion authored by Judge Kimberly Moore, the panel agreed with the district court that certain claims of the '713 Patent (in particular, claims 1-3 and claim 9) were directed to abstract ideas without supplying any inventive concept that would render the claims patent eligible. However, the panel determined that claims 4-7, although directed to abstract ideas, "contain limitations directed to the arguably unconventional concept described in the specification." The panel did not determine that claims 4-7 were eligible; rather, it concluded that the district court had failed to give appropriate consideration to whether there was a factual dispute concerning conventionality. In particular, the panel stated that "the improvements in the specification, to the extent they are captured in the claims, create a factual dispute regarding whether the invention describes well-understood, routine, and conventional activities." According to the panel, claims 4-7 did (at least arguably) capture alleged improvements related in the specification such as "eliminat[ing] redundancies, improv[ing] system efficiency, reduc[ing] storage requirements, and enabl[ing] a single edit to a stored object to propagate throughout all documents linked to that object." Accordingly, there was an unresolved issue of fact as to whether such claimed improvements were well-understood, routine, or conventional to the skilled artisan at the time of the patent, and summary judgment was thus inappropriate. The case was remanded for further proceedings addressing the unresolved factual issues.

Aatrix Software, Inc. v. Green Shades Software, Inc. (Circuit Judges Moore*, Reyna, Taranto), No. 17-1452, Feb. 14, 2018:

In Aatrix Software, the district court invalidated six claims on eligibility grounds in two patents—U.S. Patent Nos. 7,171,615 and 8,984,393. For claim 1 of the '615 Patent, the district court determined that there was no corresponding "tangible embodiment" and therefore the claim was directed to ineligible subject matter. For the other five claims, the district court determined that the claims were generally directed to the abstract idea of "collecting, organizing, and performing calculations on data to fill out forms: a fundamental human activity that can be performed using a pen and paper" with no additional inventive concepts recited in the claims. The district court also denied a motion to file a second amended complaint that included new factual allegations and supporting documentation.

In a majority opinion also (like Berkheimer) authored by Judge Moore, the Federal Circuit held that the district court's invalidity determination for claim 1 of the '615 Patent on the lack of a tangible embodiment in the claim was legally erroneous. Moreover, the district court's denial of leave to file the second amended complaint was unjustified and lacked a reasonable explanation under regional (Eleventh) circuit law. Had the allegations in the second amended complaint been taken as true, as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, there were unresolved issues of fact as to whether the claims included an inventive concept that precluded early dismissal.

Judge Reyna concurred-in-part and dissented-in-part. He agreed that claim 1 of the '615 Patent should not have been held ineligible just because it was not directed to a tangible embodiment. He also agreed that the district court should have granted leave for the second amended complaint to be filed. However, he would have left it to the district court to evaluate the second amended complaint in the first instance.

Judge Reyna also took issue with the majority's statements concerning the importance of factual issues that may underlie the patent eligibility determination under § 101. He wrote: "Our precedent is clear that the § 101 inquiry is a legal question. In a manner contrary to that standard, the majority opinion attempts to shoehorn a significant factual component into the Alice § 101 analysis." Moreover, according to Judge Reyna, the majority opinion "attempts to shift the character of the § 101 inquiry from a legal question to a predominately factual inquiry. The risk of this approach is that it opens the door in both steps of the Alice inquiry for the introduction of an inexhaustible array of extrinsic evidence, such as prior art, publications, other patents, and expert opinion." Finally, Judge Reyna indicated that he believed the majority's approach "would turn the utility of the 12(b)(6) procedure on its head, in particular in the context of § 101."

* = author

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

D. Stuart Bartow
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions