United States: Supreme Court's Upcoming Whistleblower Decision May Dramatically Impact Compliance Programs

Last Updated: December 18 2017
Article by Mark A. Kornfeld, Jonathan A. Forman and Frank M. Oliva

On November 28, 2017, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument on whether whistleblowers are entitled to protection from retaliation under Section 922 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act's ("Dodd-Frank") anti-retaliation provision even when they do not report wrongdoing to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").1 Because this anti-retaliation provision bolsters the existing patchwork of federal and state laws protecting whistleblowers, the Supreme Court's forthcoming decision may have far-reaching implications on corporate compliance programs.

Background on Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers

The case before the Court, Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, involves an employee who was terminated for reporting to senior management that his supervisor had eliminated internal controls in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Sarbanes Oxley").2 While the employee reported the alleged violations internally, he did not report them to the SEC. Before the Supreme Court granted certiorari on June 26, 2017, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the employee's ability to bring an anti-retaliation claim against his former employer under Dodd-Frank's anti-retaliation provision even though he only reported internally, stating that the provision "unambiguously and expressly protects from retaliation all those who report to the SEC and who report internally."3 However, other circuit courts, including the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, have held that Dodd-Frank's anti-retaliation provision protects whistleblowers only when they report wrongdoing to the SEC.4

The disagreement among the circuit courts stems from interpretation of Section 21F(h)(1)(A)(iii) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), as promulgated under Dodd-Frank. This provision prohibits employers from retaliating against "whistleblowers" for, among other things, "making disclosures that are required or protected under" Sarbanes-Oxley, the Exchange Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1513(e), "and any other law, rule, or regulation subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission."5 Among other laws, rules and regulations, several provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley require or protect reporting of alleged securities violations internally, without regard to further reporting to the SEC.6

At the same time, Section 21F(a)(6) of the Exchange Act limits the definition of "whistleblower" to "any individual who provides . . . information relating to a violation of the securities laws to the Commission."7 In reading this definition of "whistleblower" together with Dodd-Frank's anti-retaliation provision, both of which were specifically enacted by the same legislation, some courts have held that whistleblowers who only report internally are not protected under the legislation.

The SEC, however, which issued a rule stating that internal whistleblowers are also subject to protections under Dodd-Frank in 2011, has taken the position that the Dodd-Frank's anti-retaliation protections cover whistleblowers regardless of whether they report to the SEC, and has urged deference to its interpretation because protecting internal reporters from retaliation is viewed as essential to its enforcement efforts.8

Justices Signal Strict Interpretation of Dodd-Frank During Oral Argument

Although the Supreme Court is not expected to issue a decision in this case until next year, the Justices' questions during the oral argument signal that they may be leaning towards the more restrictive view of Dodd-Frank's anti-retaliation provisions adopted by the Fifth Circuit and other courts.

During oral argument, Digital Realty Trust argued Dodd-Frank's plain language clearly protects whistleblowers, who are defined under the statute as only those who report wrongdoing to the SEC.9 Somers, on the other hand, argued that the SEC's rule deserves deference, that a narrow interpretation of Dodd-Frank's anti-retaliation provision is inconsistent with congressional intent, and that such an interpretation would provide those who report to the SEC with protection—even if the retaliation is unrelated to what they report to the SEC—while others would remain unprotected because they only reported internally.

The Justices focused heavily on the plain language of the statute, suggesting that while it may seem unfair that some employees will be protected simply because they report to the SEC, the plain language of a statute controls even though it leads to an anomalous result. The Justices also expressed some skepticism towards the SEC's rule and seemed critical of the SEC's failure to indicate that it intended to expand the definition of "whistleblower" in its notice of proposed rulemaking. Newly-appointed Justice Neil Gorsuch seemed particularly critical of the SEC's broad interpretation of Dodd-Frank, stating that "I'm just stuck on the plain language here" and asking how Congress could have been clearer in setting the standard for whistleblower protection. Justice Gorsuch also suggested that circuit courts should not have upheld the SEC's rule because doing so "allowed an agency to swallow a large amount of legislative power and judicial power in the process."


A ruling that Dodd-Frank does not protect employees who only report internally would significantly affect internal compliance programs by discouraging employees from reporting misconduct internally. Such a ruling would further incentivize employees to instead report potential misconduct immediately to the government in order to receive anti-retaliation protection as well as a potential bounty from the SEC's Whistleblower Program, which has already awarded more than $179 million to 50 whistleblowers over the past five years.10


1 Oral Argument, Digital Realty Trust Inc. v. Somers, No. 16-1276 (2017), https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-1276_i426.pdf.

2 Somers v. Digital Realty Trust Inc. et al., No. 15-17352 (9th Cir. Mar. 8, 2017), http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/03/08/15-17352.pdf.

3 Id. (emphasis added).

4 Asadi v. GE Energy USA LLC, No. 12-20522 (5th Cir. Jul. 17, 2013), at 15 (emphasis in original), http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions%5Cpub%5C12/12-20522-CV0.wpd.pdf.

5 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(h)(1)(A)(iii).

6 See, e.g., Sarbanes-Oxley §§ 307 (requiring disclosures by attorneys to general counsel), 806 (protecting disclosures to a supervisor or compliance officer at a public company).

7 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(a)(6) (emphasis added).

8 See Brief of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Amicus Curiae in Support of the Appellant and Reversal of the District Court, Verfuerth v. Orion Energy Sys., Inc., No. 16-3502 (7th Cir. May 5, 2017) (Amicus Brief), at 1, https://www.sec.gov/litigation/briefs/2017/verfuerth-vs-orion-energy-050517.pdf.

9 Oral Argument, Digital Realty Trust Inc. v. Somers, No. 16-1276 (2017), https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-1276_i426.pdf.

10 SEC Release, Former Company Insider Earns More Than $4.1 Million for Whistleblower Tip, Immediate Rel. 2017-222 (Dec. 5, 2017), https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2017-222.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions