ARTICLE
11 December 2017

First Deputy Comptroller Of The Currency Keith Noreika Discusses "Whether Bank Holding Companies Are Obsolete"

AO
A&O Shearman

Contributor

A&O Shearman was formed in 2024 via the merger of two historic firms, Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling. With nearly 4,000 lawyers globally, we are equally fluent in English law, U.S. law and the laws of the world’s most dynamic markets. This combination creates a new kind of law firm, one built to achieve unparalleled outcomes for our clients on their most complex, multijurisdictional matters – everywhere in the world. A firm that advises at the forefront of the forces changing the current of global business and that is unrivalled in its global strength. Our clients benefit from the collective experience of teams who work with many of the world’s most influential companies and institutions, and have a history of precedent-setting innovations. Together our lawyers advise more than a third of NYSE-listed businesses, a fifth of the NASDAQ and a notable proportion of the London Stock Exchange, the Euronext, Euronext Paris and the Tokyo and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges.
On November 28, 2017, Keith Noreika, First Deputy Comptroller of the Currency discussed whether bank holding companies are obsolete, a topic he described as both timely and complex.
United States Finance and Banking

On November 28, 2017, Keith Noreika, First Deputy Comptroller of the Currency discussed whether bank holding companies are obsolete, a topic he described as both timely and complex. Mr. Noreika, newly relieved of his post as Acting Comptroller, contended that the correct question to be asking is whether bank holding companies are a universally sound practice for all banks, noting that they may inherently be more valuable for large, complex, institutions, as compared to smaller, more traditional banks. He suggested that many of the reasons why bank holding companies were established initially are no longer as large of a concern given the evolution of state and federal laws and regulation. Moreover, he contended that while operating a bank holding company results in very high compliance and regulatory costs, in many instances, the powers granted to banks have expanded, while those granted to bank holding companies have narrowed. Mr. Noreika also noted that while bank holding companies may be a tool for reducing systemic risk, they are not the only tool that can accomplish this end and presented alternatives to the bank holding company construct such as merging the holding company into the bank.

The transcript of Mr. Noreika's remarks is available at:

https://www.occ.treas.gov/news-issuances/speeches/2017/pub-speech-2017-142.pdf .

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More