ARTICLE
29 August 2017

A Practical Approach To Defending Fair Credit Reporting Act Class Actions In Federal Court

TP
Troutman Pepper Locke LLP

Contributor

Troutman Pepper Locke helps clients solve complex legal challenges and achieve their business goals in an ever-changing global economy. With more than 1,600 attorneys in 30+ offices, the firm serves clients in all major industry sectors, with particular depth in energy, financial services, health care and life sciences, insurance and reinsurance, private equity, and real estate. Learn more at troutman.com.
Partners Timothy St. George and David Anthony coauthored a byline published in Business Law Today titled, "A Practical Approach to Defending Fair Credit Reporting Act Class Actions in Federal Court."
United States Consumer Protection

Partners Timothy St. George and David Anthony coauthored a byline published in Business Law Today titled, "A Practical Approach to Defending Fair Credit Reporting Act Class Actions in Federal Court." As the headline suggests, the article explores defenses for contending that no class be certified. The authors write, "Given the highly technical nature of the FCRA, as well as the magnitude of recent awards under the statute, the FCRA is a dangerous statute for defendants. That danger is exponentially more acute in the context of a putative class action. ... substantial attention to potential certification defenses is necessary from the very outset of the action, and defendants can then use the discovery process as a tool to substantiate any factual bases necessary to resist class certification."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More