United States: Tax Concerns On Outbound I.P. Transfers: Pitfalls & Planning

Last Updated: May 10 2017
Article by Philip R. Hirschfeld


In a 21st century America where new ideas continually create new intangible property ("I.P."), U.S. corporations often desire to contribute their I.P. to a foreign affiliate who then develops and markets the I.P. and its progeny around the world. The desired tax goals are to have the I.P. transferred tax free and defer the U.S. taxation of the profits earned by the foreign affiliate until the profits are repatriated back to the U.S. as a dividend.

When the outbound transfer of I.P. would otherwise receive tax-free treatment under Code §351 (or another tax-free rule), Code §367(d) steps in to prevent tax deferral. Code §367(d) recharacterizes the I.P. transfer as a sale of the I.P. for a future stream of royalties, which are taxable to the U.S. corporate transferor as ordinary income.

In grappling with Code §367(d), careful taxpayer planning is important in many ways. Taxpayer should consider (i) structuring the transfer as a possible taxable sale to avoid Code §367(d); (ii) minimizing the taxable royalty that is imposed under Code §367(d); (iii) separating the I.P. transfer from other steps taken to develop the I.P., such as in a cost sharing arrangement ("C.S.A."); and (iv) grappling with the Code §482 transfer pricing rules that overlay all these actions.

On March 23, 2017, taxpayer planning paid off when the Tax Court delivered the I.R.S. a major defeat in Amazon.com, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commr.,1 which dealt with the transfer pricing rules applicable to an outbound I.P. transfer and related C.S.A. This article will explore the rules related to tax-free treatment on outbound transfers of I.P., as well as planning options and the recent Amazon case, to reveal the potential tax potholes and the ways that I.P. developers can avoid them or lessen their damage.


U.S. pharmaceutical companies, high-tech businesses, and other corporations produce numerous I.P. rights through investment in research and development ("R&D"). This newly developed I.P. is often destined to be held by foreign affiliates engaged in operations around the world.

In such cases, U.S. corporations will generally rely on Code §351 to contribute the I.P. to a foreign corporate affiliate in a tax-free manner. Code §351 will apply if the U.S. corporation owns 80% or more of the foreign affiliate's stock, but the U.S. entity will face additional barriers provided in the Code.

Barriers to Tax-Free Treatment

One barrier to U.S. tax deferral is the controlled foreign corporation ("C.F.C.") rules. If the foreign affiliate is characterized as a C.F.C.,2 the income generated by that C.F.C. can be characterized as Subpart F income resulting in immediate taxation to its U.S. shareholders.3 However, careful structuring of the operations of the C.F.C. can avoid generating Subpart F income.

Royalty income that may be classified as foreign personal holding company income ("F.P.H.C.I."), which generates Subpart F income, can be excluded from F.P.H.C.I. if the C.F.C. derives such income from an active trade or business and receives the royalty from an unrelated person.4 As a result, the U.S. corporation that created the I.P. may be able to achieve tax deferral by moving the I.P. offshore and accumulating the profits in its foreign affiliate until repatriating those earnings back to the U.S. as a dividend. However, Code §367 is another barrier that must be overcome to achieve that goal.

Section 367(a) Limitations

Code §367(a) creates a general rule, which provides that the Subchapter C non-recognition rules (such as Code §351) do not apply when a U.S. corporation moves assets to a non-U.S. corporation. However, there is a helpful exception to this rule where the transferred assets are used in an active trade or business conducted outside the U.S.5 This exception can be used to preserve the tax-free transfer of the I.P. if the I.P. is to be used in an active trade or business, which is usually the case.

The active business exception does not apply to certain assets such as inventory and accounts receivable, but these existing limitations do not cover the classic types of I.P. moved offshore.6 The I.R.S. issued regulations on December 15, 2016, that goodwill and going concern value are not eligible for the active business exception.7 These regulations provide that a transfer of goodwill or going concern value would be taxable immediately under Code §367(a) or, at the election of the taxpayer, taxable over the useful life of the I.P. under §367(d), as discussed below. Goodwill and going concern value transfers are generally applicable when a business is being moved offshore rather than when select I.P. assets are being transferred. As a result, the I.P. transferor can generally escape the clutches of §367(a), but there is one more Code §367 hurdle: Code §367(d).

Section 367(d) Limitations

Code §367(d) applies to transfers of I.P. from a U.S. corporation to a foreign corporation made under the non-recognition rules of Code §§351 or 361, which applies to corporate reorganizations. This section was created to catch transactions that may escape U.S. taxation until the U.S. taxpayer chooses to repatriate the earnings of its C.F.C. as a dividend or sells or disposes of the C.F.C.

Code §367(d) does not, however, apply in the case of an actual sale or license of I.P. by a U.S. person to a foreign corporation.8 As a result, a taxpayer may choose to do a taxable sale of the I.P. to a foreign affiliate and then only has to ensure that the sales price is acceptable under the Code §482 transfer pricing rules. A taxable sale should be considered since it may produce less aggregate tax over time and eliminate the annual burdens imposed in complying with Code §367(d).

I.P.9 subject to Code §367(d) includes any of the following:

  • Patents, inventions, formulas, processes, designs, patterns, or know-how
  • Copyrights or literary, musical, or artistic compositions
  • Trademarks, trade names, or brand names
  • Franchises, licenses, or contracts
  • Methods, programs, systems, procedures, campaigns, surveys, studies, forecasts, estimates, customer lists, or technical data
  • Any similar items

The regulations provide that these items are treated as I.P. without regard to whether they are used or developed in the U.S. or in a foreign country, and without regard to whether they are used in manufacturing or marketing activities.10 While goodwill and going concern value are not in the statutory list of I.P., recently adopted regulations provide that goodwill and going concern value transfers are taxable under Code §367(a), but, at the taxpayer's election, goodwill and going concern value may be treated as I.P. subject to Code §367(d) rather than being immediately taxable under Code §367(a).11

Code §367(d) does not impose full, immediate taxation on the transfer of the I.P. Instead, Code §367(d) creates a sale for a series of annual royalty payments "contingent on the productivity, use or disposition of the intangible property," which are deemed paid by the foreign recipient to the U.S. transferor over the "useful life" of the I.P. The final Code §367(d) regulations adopted on December 15, 2016, eliminated the ability to assume a maximum 20-year useful life. The final regulations12 revised the definition of "useful life" to include "the entire period during which exploitation of the property is reasonably anticipated to affect the determination of taxable income, as of the time of the transfer."

The regulations include an exception for property with an indefinite useful life or with a life that is reasonably anticipated to exceed 20 years. The exception allows the transferor to take the amount into income during a limited 20-year period. The only catch is that the annual royalty must be increased to take into account the additional value attributable to the period following 20 years (i.e., a transferor still must take into account the present value of all amounts, including amounts after the 20-year period while the property still has useful life).13 The Code §367(d) regulations then state that the appropriate charge shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Code §482.14 As a result, the U.S. transferor recognizes taxable income over the useful life of the I.P. regardless of whether any dividend is received by it from the foreign affiliate.15

The cross-reference to the Code §482 rules invokes Treas. Reg. §1.482-4, which addresses methods to determine taxable income in connection with a transfer (or license) of I.P. The bottom line is that the taxpayer will require the assistance of a transfer pricing expert and study to determine the appropriate, arm's length amount for the royalty payment.

Additionally, the determination of the deemed royalty payment may necessitate future adjustments to the deemed royalty payment. The Code §482 regulations provide generally that if I.P. is transferred under an arrangement that covers more than one year, the consideration charged in each taxable year may be adjusted to ensure that it satisfies the "commensurate-with-income" requirement (the "periodic adjustment requirement").16

The deemed annual payments under Code §367(d) are characterized as ordinary income of the U.S. transferor, whether or not a sale or exchange of the I.P. would have given rise to capital gain.17

Any outbound I.P. transfer is subject to reporting on Form 926, Return by a U.S. Transferor of Property to a Foreign Corporation.18 The U.S. transferor must provide and explain the calculation of the deemed payment.19


I.P. is at the core of C.S.A.'s, which are often undertaken in high-tech, pharmaceutical, and other industries.

A C.S.A. is an arrangement between two parties under which the parties agree to share the costs of developing I.P. in proportion to each party's share of reasonable anticipated benefits ("R.A.B.") from the I.P.20 In a C.S.A., buy-in payments – which are referred to as platform contribution transaction ("P.C.T.") payments – are often required to be paid for the transfer of any resource, capability, or right that is reasonably expected to contribute to the development of the I.P.

C.S.A.'s are often undertaken between a U.S. corporation and an affiliated foreign company. This results in income recognition by the U.S. corporation when a P.C.T. payment is received from a foreign affiliate, as well as the application of the Code §482 transfer pricing rules. For transfer pricing purposes, the parties will likely desire to lower the amount of income recognized by the U.S. corporation by selecting an appropriate transfer pricing method for the P.C.T. payment. To achieve this tax goal, the foreign affiliate will pay for the I.P. based on the cost of development, rather than on the value of the development after the I.P. has been created. However, the I.R.S. may disagree with that approach, so as to increase the amount of income recognized by the U.S. corporation.

In the 2009 Tax Court case Veritas Software Corp. v. Commr.,21 a U.S. parent company granted its Irish subsidiary the right to use all its existing technical and marketing intangibles to develop software under a C.S.A. In consideration for such transfer, the Irish subsidiary made a P.C.T. payment to the U.S. parent calculated under the comparable uncontrolled transaction ("C.U.T.") method. Under this method, the payment is based on the amount a third party would have paid the U.S. parent for the intangibles in a comparable transaction.

The I.R.S. did not agree with the taxpayer and asserted that the C.U.T. method was not the right method to use under Code §482. Rather, the I.R.S. asserted that the income method should have been used on an aggregate basis with all related transactions. This method would have determined the appropriate P.C.T. payment based on the future expected income stream from the developed I.P. The I.R.S. position would have led to more than ten times the income actually reported by the U.S. parent. However, the Tax Court held for the taxpayer.

In the absence of specific regulations addressing C.S.A.'s, the Tax Court sustained the use of the C.U.T. method and rejected the I.R.S.'s use of aggregation and the income method. The I.R.S. did not appeal Veritas but did issue an Action on Decision stating that it disagreed with the Tax Court.22

In 2009, the I.R.S. published proposed and temporary Code §482 regulations, which were adopted two years later in final form.23 These regulations contain rules for how to value P.C.T. payments and include the income method that the I.R.S. unsuccessfully tried to apply in Veritas. These regulations also state that an aggregation approach to valuing transfers involved in a C.S.A. "may" be appropriate to determine the combined effect of multiple contemporaneous transactions that include the C.S.A. and other related I.P. transfers.24

On March 23, 2017, the Tax Court reaffirmed its thinking in the Veritas transfer pricing case in Amazon.com, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commr.25 In the latter case, Amazon.com, Inc. and its domestic subsidiaries (collectively "Amazon") entered into a C.S.A. with a Luxembourg subsidiary and gave the subsidiary the right to use some of its I.P. The subsidiary agreed to make an up-front payment as well as annual payments to Amazon to compensate for the use of the I.P. The I.R.S. disagreed with Amazon's pricing methodology and instead called for the use of a method that, Amazon asserted, was the same one rejected by the Tax Court in the Veritas decision. Once again, the Tax Court rejected the I.R.S. claim and held for the taxpayer.

The Tax Court determined that the I.R.S.'s valuation method with respect to the buy-in payment was "arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable." The court held that Amazon's use of the C.U.T. method, with adjustments, was the best method to determine the buy-in payment. The court also accepted Amazon's use of the cost allocation method, whereby parties that have entered into a C.S.A. share "all of the costs incurred . . . related to the intangible development,"26 to determine later year payments.

The decision shows that the taxpayer's choice of transfer pricing method is important to reduce tax. In Amazon, the taxpayer chose an allocation method essentially similar to that used in the Veritas decision and, like the taxpayer in that earlier case, achieved a major victory. While the I.R.S. may try to require use of a method that produces a higher tax bill, the Tax Court has been supportive of the taxpayer's choice of method.


One multi-transaction scenario that concerns the I.R.S. occurs when (i) I.P. is transferred to a foreign subsidiary in a Code §351 tax-free contribution, which triggers application of Code §367(d), and then (ii) a C.S.A. is entered into between the U.S. parent and its foreign subsidiary for which P.C.T. payments are made, which triggers application of Code §482.

On September 14, 2015, the I.R.S. published temporary regulations under Code §§482 and 367(d), which specifically indicated that the I.R.S. could consolidate two such related transactions for the purposes of Code §§367(d) and 482:

The combined effect of two or more separate transactions (whether before, during, or after the year under review), including for purposes of an analysis under multiple provisions of the Code or regulations, may be considered if the transactions, taken as a whole, are so interrelated that an aggregate analysis of the transactions provides the most reliable measure of an arm's length result determined under the best method rule of § 1.482-1(c).27

The temporary regulations included an example in which the U.S. parent wanted to separate two transactions so as to reduce its aggregate tax exposure. In the first transaction, P, a U.S. corporation, contributes the foreign rights to conduct its business, including the foreign rights to its I.P., to a newly-incorporated, wholly-owned foreign subsidiary, S1. In the second transaction:

P and S1 enter into a cost sharing arrangement ("CSA") to develop and exploit the rights to conduct the Business. Under the CSA, P is entitled to the U.S. rights to conduct the Business, and S1 is entitled to the rest-of-the-world ("ROW") rights to conduct the Business. P continues after Date Y to perform the Support, employing resources, capabilities, and rights that as a factual matter were not contributed to S1 in the Date X transaction, for the benefit of the Business worldwide. Pursuant to the CSA, P and S1 share the costs of P's Support in proportion to their reasonably anticipated benefit shares from their respective rights to the Business.28

In the example, the taxpayer took the position that these were two separate transactions:

P treats the Date X transaction as a transfer described in section 351 that is subject to 367 and treats the Date Y transaction as the commencement of a CSA subject to section 482 and § 1. 482-7. P takes the position that the only platform contribution transactions ("PCTs") in connection with the Date Y CSA consist of P's contribution of the U.S. Business IP rights and S1's contribution of the ROW Business IP rights of which S1 had become the owner on account of the prior Date X transaction.29

The I.R.S. disagreed with the taxpayer and maintained that the two transactions could be collapsed together if doing so would produce greater income recognition for the U.S. parent than if the two transactions were treated separately.


I.P. transfers to offshore entities are often made by U.S. multinational corporate groups. The I.R.S. has focused on these transactions under two separate anti-deferral regimes: Code §§367(d) and 482. While these rules are difficult enough to deal with on their own, more complexity was added when the I.R.S. adopted regulations that will allow them to apply these rules on an aggregate basis if that may produce greater income recognition. However, the Tax Court's recent Amazon decision shows that the court has been deferential to taxpayers who prepare and document a comprehensive transfer pricing analysis. While the ruling may not diminish the I.R.S.'s desire to maximize an I.P. transferor's income, careful planning on the part of the taxpayer could deter I.R.S. challenges. If not, the road ahead may have more potholes for the I.R.S. than the taxpayer.


1 148 T.C. No. 8 (2017).

2 Code §957.

3 Code §951(a)(1)(A)(i).

4 Code §954(c)(1).

5 Code §367(a)(3).

6 Code §367(a)(3)(B).

7 Treas. Reg. §1.367(a)-1(b)(5).

8 Treas. Reg. §1.367(d)-1T(g)(4)(i). If I.P. is transferred to a related foreign corporation for no consideration, then no sale or license subject to adjustment under Code §482 shall be deemed to have occurred. Instead, the U.S. transferor is treated as having made a Code §367(d) transfer of I.P. (Treas. Reg. §1.367(d)-1T(g)(4)(i)). However, a royalty-free license may not be subject to this rule and may be able to escape taxation, subject to application of the Code §482 regulations.

9 Code §367(d)(1), which adopts the definition in Code §936(h)(3)(B). This definition is similar to that set forth in the Code §482 regulations. Excluded from this list are a copyright; a literary, musical, or other artistic composition; a letter or memorandum; or similar property created by the taxpayer (Treas. Reg. §1.367(a)-5T(b)(2); cross-referenced by Treas. Reg. §1.367(d)-1T(b)).

10 Treas. Reg. §1.367(a)-1T(d)(5)(i), sent. 2; cross-referenced by Treas. Reg. §1.367(d)-1T(b), sent. 1.

11 Treas. Reg. §1.367(d)-1(c)(3)(ii).

12 Treas. Reg. §1.367(d)-1(c)(3).

13 Treas. Reg. §1.367(d)-1(c)(3)(ii).

14 Treas. Regs. §§1.367(a)-1(b)(3), (c).

15 Code §367(d)(2)(A)(ii)(I).

16 Treas. Reg. §1.482-4(f)(2)(i).

17 Code §367(d)(2)(C); Treas. Reg. §1.367(d)-1T(c)(1).

18 Treas. Reg. §1.6038B-1(b)(1).

19 Treas. Reg. §1.6038B-1T(d)(1)(v).

20 Robert Weissler et al., "APA Training: Cost Sharing" (presentation, October 15, 2001).

21 133 T.C. 297 (2009).

22 A.O.D. 2010-05, I.R.B. 2010-49 (December 6, 2010).

23 Treas. Reg. §1.482-7.

24 Treas. Reg. §1.482-7(g)(2)(iv).

25 148 T.C. No. 8 (2017).

26 Treas. Reg. §1.482-7(d)(1).

27 Treas. Reg. §1.482-1T(f)(2)(i)(E).

28 Id., ex. 6.

29 Id.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

    Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of www.mondaq.com

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions