United States: Make College Great Again: Higher Education In The Trump Era

Much has already been written about President-elect Donald Trump's unanticipated victory and the GOP retention of Congress last week. But what should the nation's institutions of higher education — and the students they serve — expect during the Trump era?

Candidate Trump had little to say on higher education policy through the primary and general elections. What little he did say, however, largely centered around two core messages. First, federal student loan repayment plans should be more generous, and borrowers should be able to  refinance student debt. Second, endowments should be used to help make college more affordable.

With this blank slate, how should we start sketching out education policy for the next four years? The President-elect's most profound impact on higher education will, of course, be his pick for Secretary of Education. 

As with other top appointments, speculation is rampant. Former Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels and current Indiana Representative Luke Messer have been mentioned publicly in recent days for the nation's top education post. And Gerard Robinson, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, appears to be on the list as well.

Trump's eventual pick will steer federal education policy. Until then, we can look to the priorities of the GOP in Congress to see what may be in store.

Republicans in Congress have been outspoken in their concerns about regulatory over-reach at the Department of Education during the Obama years. Eliminating or modifying those Obama-era priorities will likely be at the top of their priority list.

Representative Virginia Foxx (R-NC) has been one of the Obama Administration's most vocal critics on education. Foxx is widely expected to chair the EdWorkforce Committee next year. After the election last week, Foxx said, "Our number one priority is blocking and repealing Obama administration rules and regulations." 

Over the past few years, the GOP unsuccessfully tried to repeal or delay their least favorite regulations in appropriations policy riders. Newly-emboldened Republicans could start the regulatory rollback as early as the lame duck session. At the top of the list are two of the Obama Administration's signature education regulations, which have also proven highly controversial: gainful employment and borrower defense to repayment. 

What's next for gainful employment, borrower defense?

Both regulations exceed 900 pages, and both are part of the Obama Administration's crackdown on for-profit colleges and universities. Stock prices of the publicly-traded for-profit colleges soared with the news of Trump's election. The White House-led multi-agency task force that has been coordinating efforts against for-profit schools will likely cease its work after Trump's inauguration.

Gainful employment creates minimum debt-to-income ratios that institutions must meet or else lose access to federal aid. Over the last eight years, the Department of Education wrote and then rewrote this rule. Because most nonprofit and public institutions are exempt from the rule, it disproportionately impacts for-profit colleges. In fact, if the rule applied to all institutions, many well-regarded programs at the nation's leading universities would fail.

Measures to defund or delay gainful employment have appeared in appropriations policy riders in recent years, but each time, the opposition of some Democrats in Congress has prevented their inclusion in the final legislation. 

Borrower defense to repayment is a much newer rule, released just days before the election. The rule seeks to update the process whereby borrowers seek to have their student loans discharged based on alleged misdeeds by their institution. Unlike gainful employment, this rule applies to all colleges and universities.

During the notice-and-comment period, many national associations expressed their concern over the new rule. Much of that concern centers around the overly-broad definition of "misrepresentation" could make institutions vulnerable to voluminous and seemingly-frivolous claims for debt forgiveness. 

Because borrower defense to repayment is so new, the current Labor-HHS-Education bills were written before the rule was finalized. The GOP could insert a policy rider into a final appropriations bill to defund or delay the rule. Alternatively, both houses of Congress could pass a joint resolution of disapproval of the rule under the seldom-used Congressional Review Act, which President-elect Trump could sign once in office. 

The Trump Administration could also choose to keep the rule but narrow it significantly. That way, institutions could avoid frivolous claims and borrowers who have been victims of intentional misrepresentation or fraud would still have a pathway to debt relief.

Next steps for major education legislation

More broadly, the best opportunity for the GOP to make a lasting impact on higher education in the Trump era will be the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act (HEA). This is the law that authorizes most federal higher education programs, including Pell Grants and federal student loans.

The incoming administration has a long list of priorities, and higher education is not at the top of that list. We anticipate that the new leadership at the Department of Education will simply stop implementing the Obama-era rules that they do not like. Meanwhile, Congress will work on the already-underway reauthorization of the Higher Education Act. When passed, the Department could then turn to re-regulating that new law as it sees fit – and in the process clear out any lingering Obama-era rules that the agency does not like.

In the 114th Congress, Senate HELP Chair Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and Ranking Member Patty Murray (D-WA) found common ground and used old-fashioned compromise to pass the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). Alexander planned to turn immediately to the Higher Education Act after completing its K-12 counterpart, but with the election in full swing, the clock ran out, deferring action to the 115th Congress.

Much work has already been done. Hearings have been held and many bills have been drafted. Staff have been working behind the scenes for more than a year. Murray has stated that she wants to remain atop the HELP Committee next year.

There appears to be consensus around several broad principles and issues to guide the legislation: College affordability, accountability for outcomes, accreditation reform, financial aid simplification, and deregulation. The reauthorization likely will deal with many other topics as well, including the role of the Office of Civil Rights in providing protections to victims of sexual assault and transgender students and employees. With the House and Senate in GOP hands, Senator Bernie Sanders's (I-VT) free college plan is now all but D.O.A. in the new Congress. 

Why bipartisanship may still prevail

Congress already has a template for bipartisan reform of higher education regulations.

In 2013, a group of four senators on the HELP Committee formed the bipartisan Task Force on Federal Regulation of Higher Education. With Alexander, Senators Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Michael Bennet (D-CO), and Richard Burr (R-NC) appointed 16 higher education leaders to the Task Force, which was in turn chaired by the presidents of the University of Maryland and Vanderbilt University. 

In the resulting report, released in 2015, the Task Force noted that "the Department of Education has an increasing appetite for regulation." The accompanying regulations of concern – including gainful employment – and recommendations for improvement provide a bipartisan, focus-tested framework for reform. Turning the Task Force report into legislation should be one of the main pieces of the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act.

Expect reauthorization to take at least a year to make its way through Congress. Also expect Alexander and Murray to forge quiet compromise and drown out the chatter around town that will inevitably surround the new president. With only a narrow majority in the Senate, Alexander knows he will need bipartisan support to pass reauthorization.

Foxx too will work with her counterpart, EdWorkforce Committee Ranking Member Bobby Scott (D-VA), on the bill. As was the case with rewriting the K-12 law, the bill that initially makes its way out of EdWorkforce should be fairly partisan. Foxx and Scott will then come to the table to stake their claim on top priorities and iron out differences in an eventual conference committee.

Colleges and universities should prepare for a very different Department of Education. And not just for-profit schools stand to benefit. All institutions should experience regulatory relief in the Trump era. What does remain to be seen is how research funding and appropriations will fare during the Trump years, in light of a GOP Congress animated largely by constraints on domestic discretionary spending.

With Congress on the precipice of what could be the most dramatic rewrite of higher education law in decades and with a new sheriff at the Department of Education, get ready to engage.

This article originally appeared on Law360.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions