United States: Purported "Direct Purchaser" Claims Dismissed For Lack Of Antitrust Injury In Aluminum Warehousing Antitrust Litigation

On August 9, 2016, the Second Circuit affirmed a district court's dismissal of claims asserted by two groups of self-proclaimed "indirect purchasers" of aluminum products who alleged that three aluminum futures traders, which had acquired operators of warehouses for aluminum, manipulated a price component for aluminum (warehouse storage costs).  The Second Circuit concluded that these "indirect purchasers" did not suffer antitrust injury because they were not participants in the aluminum warehousing market. In re Aluminum Warehousing Antitrust Litig., Nos. 14-3574, 14-3581(2d Cir. Aug. 9, 2016).  In the district court, Judge Katherine Forrest recently applied the Second Circuit's analysis to dismiss similar claims brought by the purported "direct purchasers" of the aluminum because they, too, were not participants in the aluminum warehousing market.  In re Aluminum Warehousing Antitrust Litig., No. 13-2481 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 5, 2016). These two decisions (assuming the district court's decision is affirmed) should help defendants attack plaintiffs' efforts to establish antitrust standing in other cases by trying to thread the "inextricably intertwined" needle for market participants that the Supreme Court established in Blue Shield of Virginia v. McCready, 457 U.S. 465 (1982).

The underlying case involves multidistrict litigation brought by three groups of plaintiffs who claim that the aluminum traders manipulated aluminum warehousing services, which caused a supply restraint that led to higher prices for Midwest Premium, a pricing benchmark incorporated into the price of aluminum that the plaintiffs eventually paid through their downstream purchases of aluminum or aluminum products.  Class action claims were asserted for three putative groups: (1) First Level Purchasers ("FLPs"), who bought aluminum directly from aluminum producers; (2) Commercials, who bought semi-fabricated aluminum to manufacture products made of aluminum; and (3) Consumers, who bought finished products made of aluminum.  The FLPs asserted Sherman Act claims as "direct purchasers" of the aluminum allegedly affected by the artificially inflated price for Midwest Premium; the Commercials and Consumers asserted damages claims under state law as "indirect purchasers" of the aluminum or aluminum products that then were manufactured and injunctive relief under federal law.  Under the law of certain states, indirect purchasers—such as the Commercials and Consumers—may sue for damages; indirect purchasers may not sue for damages under federal law. See Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977).

In its August 2016 decision, the Second Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of the claims asserted by the Commercial and Consumers, concluding that those purchasers suffered no antitrust injury and therefore lacked antitrust standing.  The Second Circuit held that the Commercials and Consumers did not participate in the market where the alleged anticompetitive conduct occurred—the aluminum warehousing market—nor did they even attempt to argue that they did.  Instead, they sought to fall within the Supreme Court's holding in McCready, in which the Court "carved a narrow exception to the market participant requirement for parties whose injuries are 'inextricably intertwined' with the injuries of market participants."  Slip. Op. at 18 (citation omitted).

In McCready, a patient asserted antitrust claims against her insurance company and a group of psychiatrists, alleging they had colluded to exclude psychologists from receiving compensation under the health insurance plan.  Although the patient was a participant in the market for psychology services, she was not a participant in the market for psychiatry services.  Nonetheless, the Supreme Court concluded that she sufficiently alleged antitrust injury because there was no risk of duplicative recovery, and her injury was clearly foreseeable and not so remote that it was not proximately caused by the offending conduct.  The Second Circuit—after pointing out that in Associated General Contractors the Supreme Court characterized the market in McCready as "psychotherapeutic services"—boiled down McCready and subsequent developments in the law as follows:  "The upshot is that to suffer antitrust injury, the putative plaintiff must be a participant in the very market that is directly restrained." Id. at 27.

Having so described the "market participant" test, the Second Circuit rejected the Commercials' and Consumers' reliance on McCready, explaining that their injuries were "suffered down the distribution chain of a separate market, and was a purely incidental byproduct of the alleged scheme." Id. at 30.  The plaintiffs' argument that the McCready exception applied because of "their role in creating demand for physical aluminum" was too attenuated.  Id. at 28.  The Second Circuit viewed the plaintiffs' argument as an attempt to replace the "inextricably intertwined" exception with a "but-for" causation test, which would eviscerate McCready's requirement of a proximate cause connection between the conduct complained of and the injury allegedly suffered.

Given the Second Circuit's analysis, the defendants moved in the district court to dismiss the "direct purchaser" claims asserted by the FLPs.  The FLPs hoped that they might persuade the district court they were market participants as described in McCready because they were not downstream purchasers but, rather, "direct purchasers"—at least as they described themselves.  The district court rejected their argument.

Judge Forrest found that the FLP claims (which were not at issue in the Second Circuit's decision), were essentially the same as the Commercial and Consumer claims: "defendants' alleged shenanigans in connection with aluminum warehousing services caused a supply restraint that led to a higher Midwest Premium." Slip. Op. at 2.  Although the FLPs tried to recast their claims, Judge Forrest recounted several examples where they had "identified the locus of defendants' anticompetitive conduct as the aluminum warehousing services market." Id. at 4.  Accordingly, the Second Circuit's analysis of the Commercial and Consumer "indirect purchaser" claims applied with equal force to the FLP "direct purchaser" claims—the FLPs were not participants in the aluminum warehousing services market, so they did not suffer antitrust injury sufficient to give them antitrust standing.  Judge Forrest paraphrased the Second Circuit's analysis as not permitting antitrust standing under McCready "unless the defendant conspirators intend to corrupt some market in which they do not participate." Id. at 12.  Notably, and unlike the more typical claims involving the purchase of price-fixed goods or components, the court did not need to resolve whether the FLPs had antitrust standing for purposes of bringing a damages claim because the court determined that the FLPs were not market participants.

Recognizing their uphill standing argument in light of the Second Circuit's decision, the FLPs also argued that the evidence demonstrated that both the FLPs and the defendants were participants in the physical aluminum market so they no longer had to rely on McGready's "inextricably intertwined" exception.  The court rejected this argument first on procedural grounds, explaining that it was far too late for the FLPs to change their basic theory of the case, which centered on anticompetitive conduct directed to the warehousing services market.  More substantively, however, the court reasoned that "the fact that the parties may compete in a market into which competitive effects trickle down is not equivalent to competing in the market in which the anticompetitive conduct occurred (warehouse services) or the market(s) intended to be most directly affected (also warehouse services)." Id. at 3.  It so ruled even while acknowledging allegations that the defendants engaged in the conduct in order to affect the price of physical aluminum. Id. at 19.

Assuming the district court's decision is upheld if appealed, these two decisions provide both plaintiffs and defendants with important guidance regarding the antitrust injury requirement for antitrust standing.  Plaintiffs often test the limits of the antitrust laws by trying to extend their applicability to situations where the conduct at issue has effects in markets other than the market that was the subject of the alleged anticompetitive conduct.  The courts have developed a number of tools to ensure that the antitrust laws—and the treble damages they provide—are not used in situations where they weren't intended to apply.  The antitrust injury requirement, and antitrust standing under Associated General Contractors, are gateway hurdles that every plaintiff must plan on satisfying; conversely, they are arguments every antitrust defense attorney has in his or her toolbox.  As the Aluminum Warehousing cases demonstrate, drawing the line between what does and doesn't constitute antitrust injury often is not as apparent or straightforward as one might like.  The Second Circuit's recent analysis provides a new guidepost regarding the limits of the McCready exception and the need for antitrust plaintiffs to demonstrate that they participated in the market or suffered an injury "inextricably intertwined" with the injuries of market participants.

It is unclear what the next steps will be, but this decision, like its predecessor, may make its way to the Second Circuit, which will need to wrestle with whether the FLPs claims are the same or different in character from the Commercial and Consumer claims. In any event, the court's decision is already having a visible impact.  In In re North Sea Brent Crude Oil Futures Litigation, two defendant oil companies recently submitted Judge Forrest's order to argue that derivatives traders lack antitrust standing to bring claims based on the alleged manipulation of the price of North Sea Brent crude oil and Brent crude oil futures.   In re North Sea Brent Crude Oil Futures Litig., No. 13-MD-02475, Dkt. 412 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 12, 2016).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
18 Aug 2019, Speaking Engagement, Florida, United States

ILTACON is the premier legal technology conference for professionals undertaking initiatives in support of the practice of law.

28 Aug 2019, Webinar, San Francisco, United States

This CLE webinar will analyze the potential antitrust ramifications of joint ventures (JVs) and other collaborations between competitors and how to balance the pro-competitive efficiencies against the anti-competitive effects of a proposed JV.

1 Oct 2019, Other, Washington, DC, United States

Orrick is proud to host the AIPN for its final breakfast meeting of 2019 for a session titled “Helping the World Gasify”. As natural gas production and use is very unevenly distributed throughout the world, often gas produced in association with crude oil is sold below cost or flared.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions