United States: Federal Appeals Court Vacates A $147M Jury Award Based On Comity Principles

Last Updated: October 10 2016
Article by Todd R. Seelman and Christopher H. Wood

A U.S. federal appeals court recently issued an antitrust decision, which if it endures,1 could provide a blueprint for how foreign companies exporting products to the U.S. may use principles of international comity to potentially avoid liability for alleged "antitrust violations that occur abroad and that involve the laws and regulations of a foreign nation."2 In short, when an exporter engages in export practices from its home country, mandated by that country's laws, as evidenced by a sworn proffer by the home country government, it may be able to avoid costly litigation based on claims that its export practices violated U.S. antitrust laws.

Litigants from time-to-time have relied on principles of international comity to short circuit litigation in U.S. courts. To ensure "amicable working relationships between nations," U.S. courts have developed comity "balancing" tests to determine when it is best to abstain from hearing a legal dispute that otherwise would be heard by U.S. courts.3 While U.S. courts may vary in the precise prongs of the balancing test, a key factor they all consider in assessing conduct that occurs entirely outside the U.S. is the "degree of conflict between U.S. and foreign law."4 If there is a "true" conflict between the U.S. and foreign law – meaning it is "impossible" for a company's trade practices to "compl[y] with the laws of both countries" – courts generally abstain from exercising jurisdiction in those circumstances.5

In September 2016 the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reaffirmed these principles as they apply to the U.S. antitrust laws and sharpened the necessary prerequisites U.S. courts use to decide whether a conflict exists sufficient to trigger a comity defense. In In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation, the Second Circuit addressed the issue of "how a federal court should respond when a foreign government, through its official agencies, appears before that court and represents that it has compelled an action that resulted in the violation of U.S. Antitrust laws."6 The Second Circuit, after a review of substantive law on the topic, held:

When a foreign government, acting through counsel or otherwise, directly participates in U.S. court proceedings by providing a sworn evidentiary proffer regarding the construction and effect of its laws and regulations, which is reasonable under the circumstances presented, a U.S. court is bound to defer to those statements.7

Guided by that holding, the Second Circuit then turned to the instant dispute before it. Based on the facts presented, it dismissed the plaintiffs' action, post-trial, alleging two Chinese exporters violated U.S. antitrust law through their price-setting practices for Vitamin C.8 Consequently, the Second Circuit vacated a $147 million judgment that had been awarded against the exporters in the underlying district court proceeding. Importantly, in that proceeding, the Chinese government had appeared before the district court and submitted a proffer (a legal brief) explaining it mandated the exporters' challenged price-setting practices. Because the Chinese government directly participated in the case and explicated the construction and effect of Chinese laws and regulations relevant to the subject, which explanation was reasonable in light of the facts, the Second Circuit deferred to the substance of the proffer. In turn, because the proffer demonstrated the Chinese export regulations at issue mandated export compliance by the Chinese exporters inconsistent with U.S. antitrust laws, the appellate court determined the exporters could not simultaneously comply with Chinese and U.S. law. This equated to a true conflict between the countries' laws and when the Second Circuit then weighed that finding with other balancing test factors, it concluded "China's 'interests outweigh whatever antitrust enforcement interests the United States may have in this case as a matter of law.'"9

The Second Circuit's decision reiterates the application of the comity defense in U.S. antitrust cases and gives guidance on how an exporter and the foreign government can potentially maximize the value of the foreign government's assistance when propounding a comity defense:

  1. Appearance. The foreign government, through U.S. counsel, should appear before the U.S. court in which the matter is pending, most likely as an amicus. In seeking deference from the court, appearances tend to be more effective than the submission of an affidavit or declaration.10 In those cases where a foreign government has appeared and provided an interpretation of its laws, the presiding U.S. court has followed the government's interpretation.11 Conversely, in the Vitamin C case, if the Chinese government had not appeared, it would have been "entirely appropriate" for the U.S. district court to independently assess whether the contested export practices were compelled by government dictate.12
  2. Statement explicating law and indicating conflict with U.S. law. The foreign government should provide an "official statement explicating its own laws and regulations."13 The primary purpose of the statement is to illustrate how the application of U.S. antitrust law conflicts with the foreign government's law or policies. Stated differently, it is critical for the statement to address the comity balancing test factor: "degree of conflict between U.S. and foreign law." To that end, the statement should consider the following factors:
    1. Identify the applicable statute, law or regulation pertaining to the exporter's trade practices.14
    2. Identify how the foreign law applies to and mandates the contested trade practices, particularly any aspect of those practices, which on its face, does not wholly appear to be mandated by the law.15
    3. Identify why the proffered construction of the law and description of its effect on the exporter's trade practices are reasonable.16 "Reasonable" is the key; the proffer must make logical sense.17
    4. Identify why the exporter could not comply simultaneously with its foreign government's law and the U.S. antitrust laws.
  3. Addressing other comity factors. The statement also should address any other factors in the relevant comity balancing test for which the foreign government can competently comment in favor of the exporter. For example, the foreign government likely will want to address the possible effect on "foreign relations if the [U.S.] court exercises jurisdiction and grants relief."18
  4. Assistance of U.S. counsel. The foreign government's statement, as well as associated strategic decisions, should be consistent with consultation with, and pursuant to legal advice of, U.S. counsel possessing subject-matter expertise.
  5. Motion to dismiss and tailored discovery. Unless tactical circumstances dictate otherwise, the statement should be submitted in conjunction with a defendant's motion to dismiss. As part of the dismissal consideration, it may be advantageous for the defendant to consider limited discovery tailored solely to the question of comity. Creating a record, containing evidence pertinent to all relevant interests and policies implicated by a comity balancing test, likely will equip the district court with sufficient evidence to grant dismissal, saving all the parties considerable monies and resources.[19]


1 Plaintiffs in the matter may petition the appellate court for a panel or en banc rehearing of the decision. See, e.g., 2d Cir. R. 35.1. As an appeal of last resort, plaintiffs can petition the United States Supreme Court.

2 Animal Science Prods., Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharm Co. Ltd. (In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litig.), 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17135, at *18 (2d Cir. Sept. 20, 2016).

3 Id. at *17, *18 (quoting JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Altos Hornos de Mexico, 412 F.3d 418, 423 (2d Cir. 2005) and citing Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of Am., N.T. & S.A., 549 F.2d 597, 614-15 (9th Cir. 1976) and Mannington Mills, Inc. v. Congoleum Corp., 595 F.2d 1287, 1297-98 (3d Cir. 1979)).

4 Id. at *20. See Hartford Fire Ins. Co v. California, 509 U.S. 764 (1993). See generally Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 403 (1987) (listing factors to use in assessing whether exercise of jurisdiction is reasonable, including "likelihood of conflict with regulation by another state").

5 Id. at *21 (quoting Hartford Fire, 509 U.S. at 799).

6 Id. at *3.

7 Id. at *31-32.

8 Plaintiffs alleged a violation of Sherman Act, Section 1 (15 U.S.C. § 1).

9 In re Vitamin C at *46-47 (quoting O.N.E. Shipping Ltd. v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S.A., 830 F.2d 449, 450 (2d Cir. 1987)).

10 Id. at *28-29 (citing Villegas Duran v. Arribada Beaumont, 534 F.3d 142 (2d Cir. 2008)).

11 Id. at *31.

12 Id. at *37 n.10.

13 Id. at *4.

14 Deference may not be appropriate where the governmental entity does not identify a specific law. Id. at *31 n.8.

15 In the Vitamin C case, for instance, the Chinese government explained the meaning of arguably vague and imprecise regulatory language ("industry-wide negotiated prices") applicable to the exporters' practices. Id. at *24.

16 Id. at *31-32.

17 For example, in discussing "industry-wide negotiated" prices in the Vitamin C case, the Chinese government provided a "reasonable interpretation" of the term, which helped the exporters' cause. Id. at *34.

18 Id. at *20.

19 See id. at *47 n.14.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Todd R. Seelman
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions