ARTICLE
10 August 2016

Challenge To Pension Fund Investment Decision Time Barred

PR
Proskauer Rose LLP

Contributor

The world’s leading organizations and global players choose Proskauer to represent them when they need it the most. Our top tier team of star trial attorneys, acclaimed transactional lawyers and exceptionally talented partners and associates have earned a reputation for the relentless pursuit of perfection and a dauntless pursuit of success.
federal district court in California held that a complaint filed by members of the International Union of Operating Engineers that challenged pension plan trustees' decision to make certain investments was filed five days too late and thus barred by ERISA's six-year statute of limitations.
United States Employment and HR

A federal district court in California held that a complaint filed by members of the International Union of Operating Engineers that challenged pension plan trustees' decision to make certain investments was filed five days too late and thus barred by ERISA's six-year statute of limitations.  In so holding, the court ruled that the limitations period commenced at the time the fund entered into the investment management agreement, not the time when the plan assets were actually invested.  The court explained that the action of making the payments into the investment were ministerial acts, as the fund had already been legally obligated to make them.  The case is Slack v. Burns, 13-CV-5001, 2016 BL 233292 (N.D. Cal. July 20, 2016).

Challenge To Pension Fund Investment Decision Time Barred

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More