Since the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice Corp. Pty. v. CLS Bank Int'l on June 19, 2014, there have been a surge of motions filed and granted that have invalidated patent claims for claiming patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. This trend and the substance of post-Alice orders have been widely reported. However, there has not been as much focus on the procedural aspects, which can be critical to the success or failure of such motions.
Please click here to continue reading the full text of this article
Originally published by Law360
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
