Co-authored by Jonathan R. Stroud*
In the first three years since the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) established post-grant proceedings, parties have filed thousands of covered business method reviews (CBMs) and inter partes reviews (IPRs), resulting in more than 700 final written decisions, thousands of orders, and tens of thousands of pages of written opinion from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).1 This deluge of decisions and information leads logically to questions about the relative weight of opinions and orders, their precedential value, and whether and how parties should cite to—or rely on—them. The purpose of this article is to explore the precedential value of PTAB decisions and how they might bind the PTAB and others in subsequent matters.
Please click here to continue reading the full text of this article
Originally published in the March/April 2016 edition of ABA's Landslide Magazine
*Chief patent counsel at Unified Patents Inc. He specializes in post-grant review proceedings, litigation, and appeals. He can be reached at jonathan@unifiedpatents.com.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
