ARTICLE
6 April 2016

New Utah Law Limits Restrictive Covenants To A One-Year Period

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
On March 9, 2016, Utah enacted the Post-Employment Restrictions Amendments, which limits restrictive covenants to a one-year time period from termination.
United States Employment and HR

On March 9, 2016, Utah enacted the Post-Employment Restrictions Amendments, which limits restrictive covenants to a one-year time period from termination. Any restrictive covenant that is entered into on or after May 10, 2016, for more than one year will be void. Notably, the new law does not provide for a court to blue pencil an agreement, rather the agreement as a whole will be deemed void.

Employers should be wary of enforcing an invalid restrictive covenant. Under the new law, if a court or arbitrator deems a restrictive covenant unenforceable, the employer will be liable for court or arbitration costs, attorney fees, and actual damages.

The new law has carved out several exceptions. It does not apply to (1) a "reasonable severance agreement," (2) any restrictive covenants stemming from the sale of a business, (3) nonsolicitation agreements, (4) nondisclosure agreements, and (5) confidentiality agreements. However, these exceptions are still subject to common law restrictions.

Going forward, employers should take a close look at their standard non-compete clause and make the appropriate changes to ensure that any non-compete agreements entered into starting May 10, 2016, are in compliance with the new one-year time limit.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More