Ever since the U.S. Supreme Court announced its decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l last year, the value of software inventions in the U.S. has been challenging to assess. In Alice, the Supreme Court established a two-part framework for determining patent eligibility that applies to all categories of invention, including software:
- determine whether the claims at issue are directed to a law or nature, natural phenomenon, or an abstract idea; and
- if so, determine whether the claimed elements sufficiently ensure that the patent in practice amounts to "significantly more" than a patent upon the ineligible concept itself.
The court went on to explain that this framework is intended primarily to address "preemption"—the notion that patenting concepts that are too fundamental may inhibit further innovation by preventing others from using them. In this article, Finnegan attorneys Rajeev Gupta and J. Preston Long look at factors affecting the value of software inventions.
Previously published on Embedded.com
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
