ARTICLE
12 February 2015

Peter Glaser Talks "Just Say No" Option For States On E&E TV

TP
Troutman Pepper Locke LLP

Contributor

Troutman Pepper Locke helps clients solve complex legal challenges and achieve their business goals in an ever-changing global economy. With more than 1,600 attorneys in 30+ offices, the firm serves clients in all major industry sectors, with particular depth in energy, financial services, health care and life sciences, insurance and reinsurance, private equity, and real estate. Learn more at troutman.com.
Should states opt to "just say no" to U.S. EPA’s Clean Power Plan proposal by either not submitting compliance plans or creating mechanisms that do not follow the agency’s building blocks?
United States Environment

Should states opt to "just say no" to U.S. EPA's Clean Power Plan proposal by either not submitting compliance plans or creating mechanisms that do not follow the agency's building blocks?  Peter Glaser in Troutman's D.C. office discussed that question with E&E TV's Monica Trauzzi this week.  Peter posited that the end result under either a federal or state plan might essentially be about the same; however, states choosing to sit by and wait for a federal take-over may be in a better position, given the legal vulnerability of the rule and the state's desire to avoid appearing responsible for the impact to the economy that may result from EPA's plan.

To watch the E&E TV segment (requires a subscription), click here:  Peter Glaser on E&E TV.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More