United States: UK And French Competition Authorities Issue Conflicting Decisions In Cross-Channel Ferry Merger

Last Updated: July 3 2013
Article by Matt Evans and Marguerite Lavedan
Most Read Contributor in United States, September 2019

The UK Competition Commission ("CC") has prohibited Eurotunnel from operating ferry services at the port of Dover, following its June 2012 acquisition of three SeaFrance vessels.  The decision is notable for two reasons.  First, this decision differed from that of the French Competition Authority ("FCA"), which had cleared the transaction in late 2012.  Second, the CC found itself limited in its choice of remedies by an order of the French Commercial Court and therefore decided to impose a partial prohibition instead of the more usual divestment order.  The merger review conclusions from either side of the English Channel leave Eurotunnel in a fix, trying to reconcile conflicting decisions from the competition regulators. 

Chronology of the transaction on both sides of the Channel

Following a period of heavy losses, ferry operator SeaFrance was placed in liquidation.  In May 2012, the French Commercial Court overseeing the liquidation process received bids for SeaFrance assets from several companies, including Eurotunnel – which operates the railway tunnels under the Channel – and three ferry operators: P&O Ferries, Stena RoRo and DFDS/LD.  Around the same time, Eurotunnel informed the FCA of its potential acquisition of SeaFrance assets.  The FCA exceptionally agreed that Eurotunnel would be free to complete the transaction without having to wait for French merger clearance.  On 11 June 2012 the French Commercial Court chose Eurotunnel as the buyer of SeaFrance's assets on the basis that it offered the best outcome for creditors.

Under UK merger law, parties to a transaction qualifying for review by the UK Office of Fair Trading ("OFT") are not obliged to notify the transaction for merger clearance.  But if they do not notify, they run the risk that the OFT will open a merger investigation on its own initiative.  The OFT opened such an investigation into Eurotunnel's proposed acquisition of SeaFrance on 22 June 2012.  Ten days later, as the UK and French merger reviews were underway, Eurotunnel completed its acquisition.  However, the OFT had concerns that the deal may substantially lessen competition in the provision of cross-Channel transport services and, in October 2012, referred the acquisition to the CC for an in-depth investigation.  The following week, on the other side of the Channel, the FCA cleared the transaction.  Subsequently, in June 2013, the CC reached a different conclusion from the FCA and decided to prohibit Eurotunnel from operating ferry services at the port of Dover.

The CC's decision and remedies

The CC found that Eurotunnel decided to acquire the SeaFrance ferries to prevent its rival DFDS/LD from buying them.  The CC also found that one of the three existing ferry operators on the Dover–Calais route was likely to exit in the short term, in which case Eurotunnel could gain an even larger share of the cross-Channel market.  The CC concluded that, by adding ferry services to its Channel tunnel business, Eurotunnel would increase its market share to over 50% and cross-Channel prices would rise. 

The CC considered that the most effective remedy was to prohibit Eurotunnel from operating ferry services at the port of Dover.  The prohibition will apply to any vessels for two years and to the two largest ferries it acquired from SeaFrance for 10 years (the third vessel is quite old and currently not in use).  Before the prohibition at Dover takes effect, Eurotunnel will have six months to sell its two largest ferries to one or more purchasers approved by the CC. 

The choice of a partial prohibition is striking – ordinarily, one would have expected the CC to require Eurotunnel to sell the SeaFrance ferries (a so-called "divestment" remedy).  The use of a partial prohibition is rare.  This is only the third time the CC has imposed such a remedy since June 2003, when the current UK merger control regime came into force.  This partial prohibition also is the only one to be ordered in the context of a completed acquisition.  However, this is the second time the CC has used such a remedy in a ferry merger, the first being its 2004 decision in Stena/ P&O.  In the current case, the CC had to take into account an order of the Paris Commercial Court, which had prohibited the sale of the vessels for a period of five years.  That prohibition may only be lifted by the Court through a process involving consultation with relevant French government ministers.  The uncertainty of such a process for the timing and outcome of a divestiture led the CC to find that there was no guarantee that a divestment remedy would be effective.  The CC therefore concluded that an effective and proportionate remedy would be to prohibit Eurotunnel from operating ferry services out of Dover.

The CC's decision ensures that all Dover–Calais ferry services are run by companies competing with Eurotunnel's train operations.  But it leaves Eurotunnel in a difficult position.  It has six months to sell the ferries it has bought – no doubt at a loss – and in any event it would first need the permission of the French Commercial Court and government.  A more likely option – which Eurotunnel is understood to favor – is to appeal against the CC's decision.  If it succeeds, all well and good.  If it fails, it will have to choose between operating the SeaFrance ferries out of a port other than Dover, selling the ferries to a competitor, or keeping them mothballed for ten years.

The rarity of inconsistent merger decisions in the context of international cooperation

Although the FCA and the CC reviewed the likely impact of the merger in exactly the same product and geographic markets, they came to different conclusions.  This is not a first in the history of multi-jurisdictional mergers – a notable example being the 2001 GE/Honeywell merger which was cleared by the US Department of Justice but then blocked by the European Commission – but such conflicting outcomes are rare. 

Indeed, with the proliferation of merger control regimes (over 100 around the world) and an increasing number of deals requiring merger clearance in many jurisdictions, the convergence of merger control analyses has become a priority for most competition authorities.  In recent years, agencies around the world have demonstrated their interest in ensuring that investigations and, where appropriate, remedies, are consistent.  Cooperation between competition agencies is promoted through several fora such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the International Competition Network and, within the European Union ("EU"), the European Competition Network ("ECN"). There are also increasing numbers of bilateral or multilateral agreements between competition agencies – the latest being that between the European Commission and the Swiss Competition Authority

Informal communication of non-confidential information from their respective investigations and the formal exchange of confidential information (usually with a waiver from the merging parties) has helped competition authorities around the world to reach consistent, or at least non-conflicting, outcomes.  This is why the diverging outcome in the Eurotunnel case is surprising – even more so between two close and well-established competition authority members of the ECN.  The outcome is unsatisfactory for all the protagonists, particularly, of course, Eurotunnel. 


The Eurotunnel/SeaFrance saga is far from over. The French Minister for Transport has requested an arbitration between the conflicting French and UK decisions.  This may amount to political posturing: it is improbable that the CC would cede jurisdiction to a third party in this way.  Instead, Eurotunnel's expected appeal represents its best chance of a successful outcome.  In the meantime, the case highlights the importance for merging parties to ensure that they have a strategy in place to coordinate merger filings across jurisdictions and to work constructively with competition authorities to reach a common position on the deal under review.  

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions