Massachusetts made headlines in the area of non-compete law in 2009 when a bill was introduced in the state legislature that would have (had it been signed into law) prohibited employee non-competition agreements.  Now, four years later, the same state senator who introduced the 2009 bill has partnered with another legislator to introduce a new bill that, if signed into law, would make non-compete agreements longer than six months presumptively unreasonable in Massachusetts.

Among the key provisions of the proposed legislation, termed the "Noncompetition Agreement Duration Act," are the following:

  1. The Act would apply to employee non-competition agreements entered into on or after January 1, 2014;
  2. The Act would not apply to (i) covenants not to solicit or hire employees of the employer; (ii) covenants not to solicit or transact business with customers of the employer; (iii) non-competition agreements made in connection with the sale of a business or substantially all of the assets of a business, when the party restricted by the noncompetition agreement is an owner of at least a ten percent interest of the business who received significant consideration for the sale; (iv) non-competition agreements outside of an employment relationship; (v) forfeiture agreements; or (vi) agreements by which an employee agrees to not reapply for employment to the same employer after termination of the employee;
  3. An employee non-competition agreement restricting an employee's mobility for no longer than six months would be presumptively reasonable;
  4. An employee non-competition agreement restricting an employee's mobility for longer than six months would be presumptively unreasonable;
  5. An employee non-competition agreement determined by a court to be unreasonable in duration would be unenforceable, unless: (i) the employee breached his or her fiduciary duty to the employer; (ii) the employee unlawfully took, physically or electronically, property belonging to the employer; or (iii) the employee had, at any time, received annualized taxable compensation from the employer of $250,000 or more; and
  6. When any of the three exceptions in #5 above were present, a court would have the discretion (but would not be compelled) to enforce the employee non-competition agreement for any duration determined by the court to be appropriate.

This article is for general information and does not include full legal analysis of the matters presented. It should not be construed or relied upon as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The description of the results of any specific case or transaction contained herein does not mean or suggest that similar results can or could be obtained in any other matter. Each legal matter should be considered to be unique and subject to varying results. The invitation to contact the authors or attorneys in our firm is not a solicitation to provide professional services and should not be construed as a statement as to any availability to perform legal services in any jurisdiction in which such attorney is not permitted to practice.

Duane Morris LLP, a full-service law firm with more than 700 attorneys in 24 offices in the United States and internationally, offers innovative solutions to the legal and business challenges presented by today's evolving global markets. Duane Morris LLP, a full-service law firm with more than 700 attorneys in 24 offices in the United States and internationally, offers innovative solutions to the legal and business challenges presented by today's evolving global markets. The Duane Morris Institute provides training workshops for HR professionals, in-house counsel, benefits administrators and senior managers.