United States: Is Your Default Foreclosable? Facts And Equity Determine The Answer.

Last Updated: November 28 2012
Article by Steven M. Herman

Most Read Contributor in United States, July 2019

There exist two major theories of mortgage law in the United States: the title theory, in which title to the collateral is transferred to the mortgagee until the debt secured by the mortgage has been satisfied; and the lien theory, where legal title to the property remains with the mortgagor and the mortgagee is granted a lien on the collateral until satisfaction of the debt secured by the mortgage.

In a mortgage foreclosure, one inalienable right of a mortgagor or borrower is their right of redemption or right to repay the debt secured by the mortgage and obtain a release of the lien of the mortgage against their property.

In New York, this right of redemption is generally available at any time after a default of the underlying obligation until the foreclosure auction has occurred. The inalienable nature of a mortgagor's right of redemption is further codified in the many court rulings that strike down waivers and other creative mechanisms that "clog" the mortgagor's right of redemption. The inviolate nature of the equity of redemption reflects the severity that New York courts regard the divestiture of title and evidences the high level of scrutiny that courts will apply to the foreclosure process. In the recent downturn, we have seen many cases where foreclosures were dismissed for a myriad of technical reasons.

In this context, the question of when can a mortgage be foreclosed in New York becomes relevant. This article will discuss whether all defaults under a mortgage loan, whether they be monetary, material, non-material or otherwise, will enable a lender to maintain a foreclosure proceeding that will be enforced by a New York court.

Under New York law, there is well-established precedent granting mortgagees the right to accelerate a loan and commence a foreclosure proceeding following a monetary default. Generally courts have held that "when a mortgagor defaults on loan payments, even if only for a day, a mortgagee may accelerate the loan, require that the balance be tendered or commence foreclosure proceedings."1 When faced with non-monetary defaults, the courts have turned to principles of equity to aid in determining whether a mortgagee is entitled to foreclosure as a remedy. In exercising its equitable authority, New York courts have introduced a level of uncertainty into the analysis of whether a mortgagee will be authorized to commence foreclosure proceedings. While courts seem inclined to permit the commencement of foreclosure proceedings, there exist examples in which the court exercises its equitable authority to deny this remedy to mortgagees. While these decisions cannot pinpoint how a court will rule in a particular circumstance, they do provide insight into the court's decision-making process.

As indicated, New York courts have generally upheld a mortgagee's right to commence a foreclosure proceeding following a mortgagor's failure to make a payment due under the loan documents. Barring a statutory impediment or an act of forbearance by the mortgagee, a foreclosure may be commenced immediately following the expiration of any contractually agreed-upon grace period.2 Following the commencement of foreclosure proceedings, courts will typically not deny a motion for summary judgment by the mortgagee unless the mortgagor asserts a valid defense, such as tender of the entire amount then due, bad faith on the part of the mortgagee or an unconscionable act.3

Foreclosure Allowed

In addition, relevant case law reflects that courts are apt to allow a foreclosure following the material non-monetary default of a mortgagor. In Jordan v. Sharpe, the mortgagee sought to foreclose on the collateral because of the mortgagor's failure to insure the property upon due notice.4 The mortgagor did not refute the claim that it had failed to insure the property, but instead sought to defend itself by claiming that the mortgagee made misrepresentations with regard to the property prior to its purchase.5 The court did not accept the mortgagor's claims and refused to vacate the order of foreclosure that was predicated on mortgagor's failure to properly insure the property. In European American Bank v. Village Square Associates,6 the mortgagee provided a loan to finance the construction of a shopping center. In support of its motion for summary judgment, the mortgagee presented evidence showing that the mortgagor had defaulted on its loan because (1) two of the guarantors suffered an adverse material change in their financial condition, and (2) the mortgagor breached a warranty provision that no additional funds would be required by admitting that such funds were required to complete the shopping center. The court noted that these facts were sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to accelerate the loan and prevail on its cause of action to foreclose the mortgage.7

In Laber v. Minassian, the defendant defaulted on its mortgage by demolishing a gas station building and other improvements located on the property without the consent of the mortgagee.8 The mortgage contained a covenant stating that the building and improvements could not be demolished without the consent of the mortgagee. After the razing of the building, the mortgagee exercised its right to accelerate the loan. In defense of its actions, the mortgagor presented evidence that the value of the property without the demolished building was more than sufficient to secure the principal amount of the mortgage.

In its ruling allowing the foreclosure proceeding to move forward, the court noted that "while it is true that an action to foreclose a mortgage is an action in equity, it is equally true that a court of equity may not relieve a defaulting debtor from the consequences of his action merely because the results are harsh."9 The court also noted that accepting the mortgagor's argument would create a "dangerous precedent whereby any landowner would be entitled to destroy the building on the property without the consent of the mortgagee merely because the raw land had a value in an amount greater than the principal due on the mortgage."10 Although the court did not exercise its equitable authority to prohibit the foreclosure proceeding because of its apprehension of creating a dangerous precedent, this case seems to illustrate that when presented with a more sympathetic set of circumstances, the court may choose to deny the maintenance of a foreclosure proceeding.

In Homes & Savings Bank v. Jamel Realty,11 the mortgagee commenced a foreclosure proceeding after the mortgagor defaulted on its construction loan by failing to provide proof that it had the ability to continue the construction project as contemplated by the building loan agreement.12 At the time of the default, the mortgagor required $900,000 to complete the applicable stage of the project while possessing less than $400,000 in undisbursed loan proceeds. The mortgage contained a provision that permitted the mortgagee to call a default:

if any statements, details, budgets or revisions submitted by Borrower to Lender indicate, in the opinion of Lender, that the estimated cost of construction of the Improvements is in excess of the amount of funds available to Borrower to complete and pay for such construction.13

The mortgagor claimed that the mortgagee acted unreasonably when it declared a default. In denying the mortgagor's claim, the court noted that under the circumstances, there is no support for the claim that the mortgagee acted unreasonably or in bad faith when it declared that the mortgagor was in default.14 Here, the court was willing to allow the maintenance of a foreclosure proceeding following a material non-monetary default, notwithstanding, in the court's view, the harsh results of such proceeding to the mortgagor.

Foreclosure Denied

Alternatively, when faced with potentially unduly harsh outcomes, the court has utilized its equitable authority and refused to allow the maintenance of a foreclosure proceeding. In Loughery v. Catalano, the mortgagor defaulted on its mortgage by making alterations to the property without the consent of the mortgagee.15 The alterations amounted to the replacement of a window with a door, the replacement of two foundation piers and the removal of a rear stairway that was replaced with a deck. The mortgagee did not claim it had been injured by the alterations, or that the security had been impaired in the slightest degree, but nevertheless maintained that it was entitled to foreclosure because the parties agreed to a provision requiring mortgagee consent to any alterations of the property. In dismissing mortgagee's complaint, the court noted that "an action to foreclose a mortgage is equitable in its nature, and an election to demand payment of principal sum will not be enforced if unconscionable in character."16 As evidenced by this case, even if the express language of a mortgage entitles a mortgagee upon a breach to accelerate the loan and pursue foreclosure, the court may refuse to allow the maintenance of a foreclosure proceeding if the court believes the outcome to be unconscionable.

In Rockaway Park Series v. Hollis Automotive the mortgagor purchased property that was subject to existing building violations.17 The mortgagee was aware of the building violations when the two parties entered into the loan agreement. The mortgage contained a clause providing that the whole principal sum would become due and payable at the option of the mortgagee in the event of the mortgagor's failure to comply with an order of the New York Department of Housing.18 The mortgagee later sought to commence a foreclosure proceeding claiming that the mortgagor was is in default due to the existence of the building violations. In dismissing the mortgagee's foreclosure proceeding, the court noted that it may be unconscionable to "insist upon adherence to the letter of an agreement" and allow the mortgagee to benefit on its inaction.19 Again, we see how a New York court will utilize equitable powers to deny the maintenance of a foreclosure proceeding if the court believes that the strict enforcement of the express terms of the loan documentation would be unconscionable due to the mortgagee's own action or inaction.

New York courts have uniformly held that in the absence of a valid defense they will not prohibit the exercise of foreclosure as a remedy for a monetary default. When presented with material non-monetary defaults, the case law indicates that the court will not prohibit the maintenance of foreclosure proceedings so long as in the court's opinion the outcome of such proceeding will not be unconscionable or unduly burdensome and harsh on a mortgagor. The case law seems to indicate what one would expect is reasonable; that is, that a non-material default, while technically a violation of a loan agreement or mortgage will most likely not be enforceable by the courts to divest a borrower of its real property. Obviously, determinations in this area are very fact intensive and while loan documentation will continue to amount to hundreds of pages of representations, warranties and covenants, when the remedy under these documents amounts to the loss of real property, the courts will continue to look at the facts of a non-monetary default very closely.

Originally published in New York Law Journal, Monday, November 19, 2012

Footnotes

1. First Fed. Sav Bank v. Midura, 264 A.D.2d 407 (2d Dept 1999).

2. Fannie Mae v. Shiraz Associates, 2011 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 6415 (2011).

3. New York Guardian Mortgagee v. Michael Olexa, 176 A.D.2d 401 (3d Dept 1991).

4. Jordan v. Sharpe, 92 A.D.2d 946 (3d Dept. 1983).

5. Id.

6. European Am. Bank v. Village Sq. Assoc., 212 A.D.2d 754 (2d Dept. 1995).

7. Id. at 755.

8. Laber v. Minassian, 511 N.Y.S.2d 516 (1987).

9. Id. at 545 (internal citation om itted).

10. Id. at 547.

11. Home & City Sav. Bank v. Jamel Realty, 186 A.D.2d 936, (3d Dept. 1992).

12. Id. at 938.

13. Id. at 939 n.1.

14. Id. at 938.

15. Loughery v. Catalano, 191 N.Y.S. 436 (1921).

16. Id. at 438.

17. Rockaway Park Series v. Hollis Automotive, 135 N.Y.S.2d 588 (1954).

18. Id. at 956.

19. Id. at 957.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions