Among recent developments potentially affecting how businesses
manage their climate change risks, on March 1, 2012, Senators
Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) hosted a press conference with representatives of
leading insurance companies to discuss the costs of climate change
on business and taxpayers. Vermont and Rhode Island experienced
extreme flood events in 2011 as a result of Hurricane Irene, which
killed at least 45 people and caused more than $7 billion in
damage. According to the sustainability advocacy
group, Ceres, property and casualty insurers experienced $44
billion in losses last year, attributable in part to more severe
and unpredictable weather conditions.
According to a statement made at the press conference, annual
weather-related claims increased from about $3 billion a year in
the 1980s to approximately $20 billion annually by 2010. Mark Way,
head of Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd., expressed concern that a
"warming climate will only add to this trend of increasing
losses," asking Congress to act now regarding greenhouse gas
This sentiment was endorsed by Pete Thomas, chief risk officer
at Willis Reinsurance, and Franklin Nutter, president of the
Reinsurance Association of America. Speaking to this point, Mr.
Nutter concluded that "[f]rom our industry's perspective,
the footprints of climate change are around us and the trend of
increasing damage to property and threat to lives is clear."
As Senator Sanders put it, "Perhaps no industry better
understands the impact of global warming than the insurance
industry whose job it is to analyze risk."
In addition to providing representatives of the insurance
industry with an opportunity to press for regulatory changes that
may help insurers manage these risks, the event highlighted the
tension between business and insurance carriers over identifying
and attempting to quantify and cover climate change risks. Climate
change risks carry enormous complexities, ranging from causation to
predicting future impacts and the potential costs of those impacts,
including business interruption costs due to supply issues, severe
storms and flooding, and sea level changes. As part of their own
risk management planning, business leaders will need to stay alert
to the developing world of insurance coverage of climate change
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals issued a significant decision in Maryland Department of the Environment, et al. v. Anacostia Riverkeeper, et al., holding that the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Permit issued by the Maryland Department of the Environment to Montgomery County, Md., violated the Federal Clean Water Act and state of Maryland law.
Settling federal environmental enforcement actions is one of the most important environmental legal challenges faced by regulated entities, be they multi-national corporations, small family businesses...
Those who have tried to keep up with the development of environmental law into the second decade of the 21st century will not be surprised, as others may be, by the attention now focused on reuse of soil.
What are the politics of climate change? A new poll done by Stanford University and Resources for the Future suggests that the public may be more ready to regulate carbon carbon taxthan has previously been thought.
After Sackett, the question on everyone’s mind was "How far does it go?" The first test of that question was the decision by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals – not known as a bastion of liberalism – in Belle Company v. Corps of Engineers, holding that a Corps jurisdictional determination is not final agency action subject to judicial review.