The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution gives a
criminal defendant a right to a fair trial. On 21 March 2012, the
US Supreme Court ruled that this constitutional right also includes
a right to an effective lawyer during plea bargaining negotiations.
Consequently, the right of effective counsel in all parts of a
criminal proceeding is strengthened by applying it to the entire
plea bargaining process.
The US Supreme Court formulated this new standard in two recent
cases (Missouri v Frye and Lafler v Cooper), in
which legal advice of counsel led the defendant to reject a
favourable plea bargain. The Supreme Court argued that had the
lawyers counselled the defendants well, they would have taken the
shorter sentence. To win a challenge under this new standard, a
defendant must show that with effective counsel, he would have
taken a plea offer, the judge would have approved it and the deal
would have been more favourable than the actual case's outcome.
As such, US Supreme Court case law has changed the plea bargaining
process from unregulated negotiations to a procedure under judicial
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Shearman & Sterling’s bi-annual Trends & Patterns report provides insightful analysis of recent enforcement trends and patterns in the US, the UK, and elsewhere as well as helpful guidance on emerging best practices in FCPA and global anti-corruption compliance programs.
In December 2014, the U.K. Serious Fraud Office ("SFO") secured its first criminal convictions against a number of individuals for offenses under the Bribery Act 2010 (the "Act") and, in a separate case, a corporation for offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1906 (a predecessor to the Act).
The increased globalization of the private investment industry
has given rise to an enhanced focus by U.S. prosecutors and
regulators on rooting out corrupt business activities in private
equity firms and hedge funds.
The December 23, 2014, announcement by the U.S. DOJ that Alstom, S.A. pled guilty to two FCPA charges and agreed to pay $772 million in fines generated headlines for the record-breaking size of the fine.
The Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission jointly issued a 120-page "resource guide" to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in November 2012, which confirms the DOJ's and the SEC's narrow view of several key defenses under the FCPA.
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an interesting comity decision on whether U.S. courts should defer to foreign countries’ secrecy and blocking statutes when considering motions for discovery of documents located abroad.