Audio Visual Concepts, Inc. v. Smart
Technologies, ULC, et al., Civil No. 11-1551 (JAG-CVR) (D.
P. R. 2011), addresses the issue of the staging or sequencing the
resolution of disputes pending in an international arbitration on
the one hand and in courts of law on the other. Paintiff sought a
preliminary injunction to stop its termination as the distributor
of Smart Technologies' products in the Puerto Rico. Plaintiff
alleged a violation of the Puerto Rico Dealer's Act and sued in
federal court. Smart Technologies moved to stay the action in favor
of arbitration. The operative agreement provided for mandatory
arbitration in Calgary, Canada under Canadian Law. The plaintiff
dismissed the arbitration provision as a boilerplate contract of
adhesion to circumvent the provision of the Puerto Rican law.
The District Court (delegating the decision to a Magistrate
Jude) stayed the litigation in favor of the arbitration route.
Noteworthy points for international practice discussed in the
First, the arbitration clause in the operative agreement could
have been described as a broad or general one, providing for
arbitration for any and all disputes arising out of or related to
the Agreement. The Court rejected the argument that it was mere
Second, the Court found that "federal law preempts the
direct application of section 278b-2, the Puerto Rico Dealer's
Act as choice of law in the instant case, as well as upon the
parties' agreement in the contract executed between them which
provides for application of the laws of Canada to the arbitration
issues hereunder". In particular, the Court found that the FAA
preempted any reading of Puerto Rico's Dealer's Act that
would tend to negate or limit as against public policy any
arbitration clause that provide for arbitration of controversies
outside of Puerto Rico or under foreign law. It is unclear from the
decision whether the Court believed the parties' contract was
preempted by federal arbitration law.
Third, the Court exercised its sound disretion and directed that
the case be stayed pending the outcome of the arbitral
On May 5, 2016, the U.S. Department of Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions against 77 entities and individuals associated with the Waked Money Laundering Organization.
DOJ Civil Rights Division issued a letter highlighting the risk of discrimination claims when employers request citizenship or national origin information from applicants and employees to comply with U.S. export control laws.
Congress and the president just closed a loophole in a customs law that will make it easier for any party to petition U.S. Customs and Border Protection successfully to detain, seize and forfeit imported merchandise shown to have been produced by convict, forced or indentured labor.
On April 15, Adam Szubin, OFAC Acting Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, spoke at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) on key lessons learned from U.S. sanctions programs.
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).