United States: New York Court Reaffirms Strong In Pari Delicto Defense

Last Updated: November 8 2010

Article by Brian J. Massengill , Jonathan C. Medow and Dana S. Douglas

Originally published October 29, 2010

Keywords: liability, stakeholders, in pari delicto, auditor, affirmative defense, culpability, fraud

In a decision of significance for any professional service firm, the New York Court of Appeals forcefully reaffirmed the common-law doctrine of in pari delicto as a bar against claims by corporate representatives against outside auditors who fail to uncover the corporation's own wrongdoing.

On October 21, 2010, a 4-3 majority of the Court rejected calls that it join with the high courts of New Jersey and Pennsylvania in limiting the applicability of the doctrine, which mandates that "courts will not intercede to resolve a dispute between two wrongdoers." The New York Court instead held that in pari delicto prevented corporate stakeholders from seeking redress against third-party auditors in situations where an alleged fraud has served to benefit the stakeholders' corporation—even in those instances where the temporary benefit is followed by other negative consequences.

The Court had been asked to answer certified questions in two cases—Kirschner v. KPMG LLP, and Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana v. Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP—dealing with the scope of the doctrine, which acts as an affirmative defense under New York law. Both Kirschner, an action brought by the Refco litigation trust, and Pricewaterhouse, a derivative action, involved allegations that outside auditors had either failed to prevent, or had actively facilitated, fraudulent practices by senior corporate executives.

The in pari delicto doctrine exists primarily to deter wrongdoing and to prevent courts from becoming entangled in disputes between culpable parties. In light of this purpose, the Court explained, the doctrine will typically bar suits by corporate stakeholders based on allegations of fraud within their own company. This is because traditional principles of agency law require that "the acts of agents, and the knowledge they acquire while acting within the scope of their authority[,] are presumptively imputed to their principals."

"Like a natural person, a corporation must bear the consequences when it commits fraud," the Court said. "[W]e have held for over a century that all corporate acts—including fraudulent ones—are subject to the presumption of imputation .... [P]rincipals, rather than third parties, are best-suited to police their chosen agents and to make sure that they do not take actions that ultimately do more harm than good."

New York law recognizes an "adverse interest" exception to the in pari delicto doctrine where the corporate agent acts adversely to the corporation. The adverse interest exception represents the "most narrow of exceptions" to this general rule. It applies only when an agent has "totally abandoned his principal's interest" and is acting "entirely for his own or another's purposes." This exception, the Court explained, requires total adversity between the corporation and its agent as a prerequisite to any claim by a corporate stakeholder. "[The adverse interest exception] cannot apply unless the scheme that benefitted the insider operated at the corporation's expense," the Court said. "So long as the corporate wrongdoer's fraudulent conduct enables the business to survive—to attract investors and raise funds for corporate purposes—this test is not met."

In reaffirming these long-standing doctrines, the Court rebuffed the plaintiffs' attempts "to broaden the adverse interest exception or revise New York precedents relating to in pari delicto or imputation for reasons of public policy." The plaintiffs had urged the Court to change existing doctrine to allow for auditor liability by taking greater account of a corporate agent's intent in committing a fraud and by considering the extent to which a corporation may ultimately suffer when an agent's misdeeds come to light. In the Court's view, however, these proposals went too far.

According to the Court, "[t]o allow a corporation to avoid the consequences of corporate acts simply because an employee performed them with his personal profit in mind would enable the corporation to disclaim, at its convenience, virtually every act its officers undertake." Likewise, the mere fact that a corporation might suffer harm when an agent's misdeeds are ultimately discovered did not bear on the applicability of the adverse interest exception. "The disclosure of corporate fraud nearly always injures the corporation," the Court explained. "If that harm could be taken into account, a corporation would be able to invoke the adverse interest exception and disclaim virtually every corporate fraud—even a fraud undertaken for the corporation's benefit—as soon as it was discovered and no longer helping the company."

The plaintiffs had argued that public policy concerns and a balancing of the equities in fraud cases favored corporate stakeholders over third-party auditors. In support, the plaintiffs relied on two recent cases from the high courts of New Jersey and Pennsylvania. The first–NCP Litig. Trust v. KPMG LLP—is a 2006 ruling, in which the Supreme Court of New Jersey held that neither the imputation doctrine nor in pari delicto precluded all efforts by shareholders to recover against auditors accused of negligence or active participation in corporate fraud. The New Jersey court reasoned that corporate shareholders who lack knowledge of fraud are "innocent" and, therefore, less culpable than auditors who either negligently overlook or actively assist wrongdoing.

In the second case—Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Allegheny Health Educ. and Research Found. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP—the Pennsylvania Supreme Court elected to adopt New Jersey's approach with respect to auditors who actively engage in misconduct, but stopped short of stripping the defense from auditors who are merely negligent. Thus, under Pennsylvania law, the in pari delicto defense remains available to professional service providers who are accused of negligence, but it is unavailable where a plaintiff can show that an auditor failed to act in material good faith.

Ultimately, the New York Court of Appeals declined to follow either the New Jersey or Pennsylvania approaches, opting instead to retain undiminished in pari delicto protections in cases involving either auditor negligence or active misconduct. The Court pointed to public policy considerations that militated against loosening principles of imputation by expanding the adverse interest exception.

Specifically, the Court posited that changes in the law were unnecessary to ensure that outside auditors would be sufficiently deterred from engaging in professional misconduct. "[A]n outside professional (and especially an auditor) whose corporate client experiences a rapid or disastrous decline in fortune precipitated by insider fraud does not skate away unscathed." On the contrary, the Court stated, outside professionals "already are at risk for large settlements and judgments in the litigation that inevitably follows the collapse of an Enron, or a Worldcom or a Refco or an AIG-type scandal." As a matter of public policy, "why should the interests of innocent stakeholders of corporate fraudsters trump those of innocent stakeholders of the outside professionals who are the defendants in these cases?"

In contrast, the Court recognized great risk in tampering with the adverse interest exception. "[T]he approach advocated by the [plaintiffs]," the Court said, "would allow creditors and shareholders of the company that employs miscreant agents to enjoy the benefit of their misconduct without suffering the harm." In order to avoid this result, the Court concluded: "The principles of in pari delicto and imputation, with its narrow adverse interest exception, remain sound .... [T]o the extent our law had become ambiguous, today's decision should remove any lingering confusion."

Learn more about our Professional Liability practice.

Visit us at www.mayerbrown.com.

Copyright 2010. Mayer Brown LLP, Mayer Brown International LLP, Mayer Brown JSM and/or Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. All rights reserved.

Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the Mayer Brown Practices). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP, a limited liability partnership established in the United States; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership, and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

,

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions