UK: Can A Witness Be Guilty Of Contempt By Communicating With A Third Party When They Are Part-Way Through Giving Evidence?

Last Updated: 5 February 2019
Article by Clare Stothard and Karen Jacobs

If during trial a witness is part-way through giving evidence and needs to come back after lunch or the next day to carry on, the judge will usually warn them not to talk to anyone about their evidence during the intervening period. This can be difficult for a witness, but the main reason is to prevent a third party from interfering with the witness's evidence and to prevent the witness from consulting with a third party about their answers.

What are the consequences if the witness does not heed this warning? In a recent case, Hughes Jarvis Ltd v. David Searle and Neil Jarvis (Third Party) [2019] EWCA Civ, the witness emailed his lawyers and spoke to a third party while he was part-way through giving evidence. When the judge found out, she directed that he spend the night in prison. The following day she sentenced him to 14 days' imprisonment suspended for three months. Was this sanction correct and what, in any event, is the legal basis for making such an order?


Mr Jarvis was part-way through giving evidence at trial. Before adjourning until the next day, Her Honour Judge Clarke said to him:

"I have to give you the same warning, which I gave you at lunch time, but it is an important one, not to discuss the evidence you have given or any evidence you may give, with anybody."

Despite the judge's warning, overnight Mr Jarvis sent his counsel and solicitors a number of emails and spoke to a third party, Mr O'Neill, about what would happen if his claim failed. The next day, his counsel told the judge that Mr Jarvis had emailed her, but that she had not looked at the emails. However, during re-examination Mr Jarvis admitted that he had spoken to a third party. The judge found that the communications amounted to contempt "because they breached the explicit order that I made and I find them to be a wilful disobedience."

She directed that a hearing to determine sentence should take place the following morning and that it would not be necessary for it to be determined by a different judge as she explained that she "had no personal involvement or interest in it".

The judge explained her reasoning was not about preventing further harm; it was about marking the seriousness of what had happened. She remanded Mr Jarvis in custody overnight until the hearing. At the hearing the next day, she sentenced him to 14 days' imprisonment suspended for three months. Mr Jarvis appealed to the Court of Appeal.

Impact of the witness's actions

Lord Justice Patten gave the leading judgment. He explained that the purpose of a judge's warnings is to protect the witness from any attempt by a third party to influence their evidence and to ensure, so far as possible, the evidence which the witness gives is his or her own best recollection unassisted by any other person.

As to the impact of Mr Jarvis's actions, given that his lawyers had not read the emails, the Court of Appeal did not regard the mere sending of emails to his lawyers as a contempt. Although Mr Jarvis should not have spoken to the third party, the only purpose of that conversation was to ascertain whether lenders would step in and complete the development before selling it if Mr Jarvis failed to obtain a possession order. This was opinion evidence and Mr Jarvis had identified the source of his new evidence. In actual fact, the change in his evidence was more favourable to the other side than it was to him.

The judge was free to attach either some or no weight to it given that the third party was not going to be called as a witness. But that did not mean the evidence was untrue, still less that all the other evidence which Mr Jarvis had given could not be believed or relied upon. The judge was treating his evidence as false on every other issue. There was no proper basis for this, given that Mr Jarvis had been quite open about how he obtained the information. He was doing no more than relaying what the third party had told him. It was more accurate to criticise him for attempting to improve his evidence.

Consequences of the judge's warning

The Court of Appeal decided that, although trial judges frequently warn witnesses not to discuss their evidence while still under oath, this is not to be regarded as amounting to an order and should not be treated in this way.

The obvious sanction is to ascertain what was discussed and, if appropriate, discount or give no weight to the evidence.

If the judge wanted to make her warnings an order of the court, which if breached could lead to the witness's committal, it was incumbent on her to spell out to the witness the precise terms of the order and the consequences. She had not done this.

Jurisdiction of the county court to make committal orders

Criminal contempt

In relation to a criminal contempt, the jurisdiction of the county court has been clarified by s.118 of the County Courts Act 1984 (CCA). Under that provision, if a person wilfully insults or interrupts a judge of the county court or the proceedings of the county court, or otherwise misbehaves, any officer of the court may make an order committing the offender for a specified period not exceeding one month or impose upon the offender a fine not exceeding £2,500.

There are no reported cases in which a witness has been held to commit a contempt by discussing his evidence with a third party during an adjournment. As the concept of interference with the administration of justice is a wide one, Lord Justice Patten did not want to exclude the possibility of a witness being held in contempt, particularly if they did so with a view to providing false evidence. However, on the facts known to the judge, the Court of Appeal held that there had not been criminal contempt.

In any event, the judge had no jurisdiction to deal with that type of contempt as permission of the High Court judge would be required for a criminal contempt.

Civil contempt

The judge had not considered the provisions of the CCA because she treated Mr Jarvis's conduct as breach of an order. However, as explained above, her warning was not an order of the court and she had not warned Mr Jarvis that, should he not comply, he would be in contempt.

Where committal is sought for breach of an order, the procedural code which should be followed is set out in CPR 81. These rules give detailed provisions for the time for compliance; for the affixing on the order of a penal notice; and the making and service of a committal application. They also allow the respondent to apologise and give them an opportunity to explain their actions and behaviour.

Furthermore, although a county court judge has jurisdiction to commit a person for breach of a court order of the court's own motion, it should not be exercised unless no other course is open to the judge in order to protect the process of the court and the proper administration of justice. "He should not appear to be both prosecutor and judge: for that is a role which does not become him well." (Lord Denning in Balogh v. Crown Court at St Albans [1975] QB 73)

Lord Justice Patten concluded that the judge had completely lost sight of the principles. The witness's committal to prison overnight was a completely disproportionate reaction. The judge did not follow a fair procedure. This was a misuse of judicial power and as a result the committal order was set aside.


The most obvious point about this case was that, when warned not to contact anyone about the case, the witness should have heeded the warning. Those in the position of dealing with witnesses should stress the importance of listening to that warning. Even though the committal order was set aside, if the witness had followed the warning, he would not have found himself in this position irrespective of whether or not the judge's response was disproportionate.

Nonetheless, following the Court of Appeal reasoning, it is now clear that the status of a judge's warning about not speaking to any third parties is simply that and it is not an order of the court. If a witness fails to comply with this warning, then the usual response should be that the judge should take that into account on the question of credibility of the evidence when deciding how much weight should be attached to it. Consequently, not heeding the warning may be detrimental to the case as it may impact on the prospects of success, but normally a breach of the warning should not land the witness in prison. As Lord Justice Leggatt remarked in his supporting judgment, when witness evidence is compromised a measured approach is called for. Unfortunately this could well serve as a case study in how not to deal with such a situation.

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions