UK: Latest Proposals For Leasehold Reform In England

Last Updated: 5 November 2018
Article by Emma Broad and Laura Gowing

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has issued a consultation on "implementing reforms to the leasehold system in England". This follows on from the announcement in December 2017 (2017 announcement) that the government intends to implement a ban on the sale of new leasehold houses and impose a statutory cap on ground rents for new leases of residential property granted for terms in excess of 21 years (residential long leases) (see our previous alert). The proposals will have far-reaching implications for those involved in residential and/or mixed-use schemes.


This latest consultation seeks views on how to implement four key proposals:

  • the ban on the unjustified use of leasehold in new houses;
  • the reduction of future ground rents to a nominal financial value;
  • measures to ensure that the charges that freeholders must pay towards the maintenance of communal areas are fairer and more transparent; and
  • measures to improve how leasehold properties are sold.

Ban on sale of leasehold new build houses

The government believes that "when someone buys a house, it should feel truly their own. House buyers should not be faced with a depreciating lease or a ground rent charge for any other purpose than to pay for the privilege of living in the house they have already bought". As such the government feels the growing trend to sell houses on a leasehold basis is unjustified and warrants legislation banning that practice in all but a few exceptional circumstances.

To implement this ban the government has proposed the following:

  • Once in force, the ban should apply, subject to any agreed exemptions, to the granting of new residential long leases of houses:

    • on any land held as freehold at any time; and
    • on any leasehold land acquired from 22 December 2017 (being the day after the 2017 announcement) onwards.

    By way of clarification the paper stipulates that the date of grant is the date on which the lease completes.
  • It should not be permissible to apply to register at the Land Registry a residential long lease granted or assigned in breach of the ban. If any such lease were to be registered by mistake, the homeowner should be entitled to cancel the lease and "have the freehold transferred to them at the earliest opportunity, and with the minimum of cost and disruption to them". It is currently unclear how the proposals relating to assignments are intended to work and what cases they are intended to catch.
  • There needs to be a workable definition of what constitutes a "house" though the paper fails to go beyond acknowledging the inherent difficulty of what that might be.
  • It is minded to provide exemptions for the following types of development:

    • shared ownership properties;
    • community-led housing; and
    • inalienable National Trust land and excepted sites on Crown land.

    However, it has yet to be convinced to provide other exemptions, for example for retirement living where it claims it has received commentary that such schemes can be restructured to avoid the use of leasehold while still providing the necessary additional facilities.


Under these proposals the Land Registry will have primary responsibility for enforcing the ban through preventing the registration of any leases granted or assigned in contravention of it. However, we question whether this approach is really in the buyer's best interest – if a lease cannot be registered, the buyer will only acquire an equitable title to the property (as legal title only passes on registration). This places the buyer, albeit temporarily, in the legal wilderness. As we have seen from recent registration gap cases, there are various actions only a legal owner can take (for example, service of certain notices). Also, unless properly registered in some shape or form, the buyer's interest is at risk of being subordinated to other interests registered in the interim (thanks to the Land Registry's priority rules). Finally, of course, an equitable interest is less marketable. So, while the government envisages the buyer somehow being able to "cancel" the lease and call for the freehold to be transferred to them, it will need to think very carefully about how this can realistically be achieved in the smallest possible time frame and in the context that there may be other third parties, such as lenders, involved.

In relation to "transferring" the freehold to any affected buyer, one thing that the government should try to avoid is the situation we currently have in relation to the statutory enlargement of leases (i.e. conversion of a leasehold interest into a freehold interest) pursuant to the Law of Property Act 1925, which can result in multiple freeholds of the same property (a position recently confirmed in the Law Commission's response paper on reform of the Land Registration Act 2002).

From a developer perspective, if there is any chance that a scheme may require or has been set up on the basis that residential houses will be sold off on a leasehold basis, it is vital to consider the timetable for implementation of the ban so as not to be caught out in the future. The nightmare scenario would be that a developer has acquired either:

  • a freehold site; or
  • a leasehold site after 21 December 2017,

with the intention of selling off the new houses on a leasehold basis, and those houses are not successfully sold off before the ban comes into force. Here it is vital to note that "grant" means the completion of the lease, not exchange of contracts. So, if left too late, a developer who has exchanged contracts for such sales, but completion is delayed (through no fault of its own), may find that they are caught out by the ban. Further, even if such developments are completed in good time before the ban comes into effect, there is a danger that the perception now of leasehold houses is irrevocably damaged making them less marketable irrespective of whether or not they are being granted on fair and transparent terms and even though there is currently no law against this.

The best advice for developers in light of these proposals is to avoid structuring schemes on the basis that houses will be sold off as leasehold and, so far as possible, to consider restructuring any existing schemes that envisage such sales.

Cap on ground rents for long residential leases

The government view is that, while it is necessary for leaseholders to pay consideration in the form of a ground rent (because the arrangement is a tenancy), "it is unfair for them to be required to pay economic rents at levels which are solely designed to serve the commercial purposes of the developer and any future investors. Furthermore, leaseholders see no material benefits from these payments." These comments and proposals will apply equally to leasehold flats as to leasehold houses.

The proposals include:

  • capping ground rents for new residential long leases at £10 per annum – a change to the position set out in the 2017 announcement when the government proposed capping ground rents at a peppercorn;
  • legislation to the effect that:

    • any provision in a residential long lease that permits (whether triggered by an event or otherwise) a ground rent greater than the cap, or any other replacement charge greater than the cap, will be void;
    • new residential long leases must specify the date on which the annual rent is payable; and
    • a notice is required demanding payment of ground rent to be made at least 28 days before it is due to be paid and providing that such notice must not include a demand for rent which was payable in a previous year;
  • that once implemented it will not be permissible to register at the Land Registry any new residential long lease (whether of a house or a flat) with a ground rent in excess of the proposed cap;
  • making an exemption for shared ownership schemes and considering an exemption for community-led housing. For retirement housing the government is not proposing to implement the restrictions on ground rents provided the potential buyer has a choice whether to pay a higher sale price at a ground rent of £10 or a lower sale price with a specified economic ground rent;
  • excluding mixed-use leases, for example a lease of a shop with a self-contained flat above;
  • applying the ban to the renewal of any existing residential long lease including where such lease is surrendered and re-granted (something that can happen inadvertently if the demise or the term is extended); and
  • that the cap should come into force three months after commencement of the relevant legislation.


It is interesting that the government has decided to change its position as to the level of the cap for ground rents from a peppercorn to £10. The decision to go with £10 seems entirely arbitrary – if ground rents really are an unfortunate "evil" then why choose the nominal figure of £10, when it is not uncommon for ground rents in the commercial sector to be set at a peppercorn (i.e. no financial value). The consultation seems to have drawn inspiration from the Housing Act 1985 though why it should be influenced by a piece of legislation that is over 30 years old is unclear.

The provisions relating to rendering void any ground rent provisions in excess of the cap are also unclear. For example, there is some ambiguity as to:

  • whether such provisions would be void in their entirety or would only allow the landlord to recover up to £10 in ground rent per annum; and
  • whether a pre-existing lease that reserves a ground rent but which contains provisions for review resulting in a ground rent of more than £10 are caught. We would assume not but the relevant section of the consultation just refers to "any provision in a lease" rather than "a new lease"

If such provisions are to be rendered void then query why the government is also proposing that a residential long lease containing a ground rent in excess of the cap should not be capable of registration – is it not enough that the offending provision will not apply?

The consultation paper frequently refers to the desire to avoid exemptions being misused or open to gaming yet the exception of mixed-use premises opens up a possible loophole. There has been a rise in the creation of mixed-use spaces for work and living so it is possible that such arrangements could become more popular if they circumvented the cap on ground rents.

Finally, the government's comment that "homeowners should not be faced with ... a ground rent charge for any other purpose than to pay for the privilege of living in a house they have already bought" could come back to haunt politicians. At least one think tank has, in recent months, suggested that one way of equalising the perceived lack of fairness between those who own homes and those who do not is to introduce an annual levy on the value of a person's property, possibly as a replacement of council tax and SDLT. Such a levy could equally be seen as requiring homeowners who have already bought their properties to pay for the privilege of living in their houses.

Ensuring that charges freeholders must pay towards the maintenance of communal areas are fairer and more transparent

Currently residential leaseholders, but not freeholders, have various statutory rights to challenge the reasonableness of charges made for communal facilities. The government is proposing to introduce equivalent rights for freeholders based on the existing leasehold rights set out in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, namely:

  • a requirement that maintenance charges must be reasonably incurred and that services provided are of a reasonable standard;
  • consultation requirements;
  • obligations on the provider of services to provide information to the freeholder; and
  • an ability to challenge the reasonableness of any such charges at the First-tier Tribunal.

However, the government is also seeking views on giving such freeholders the right to apply to change the management of the services covered by an estate service charge or freehold service charge.


It does seem unfair that freehold owners are not given the same protection as leasehold owners when it comes to charges for communal areas. The challenge for the government will be to ensure that any such measures are not unduly complex as that would not be in anyone's interest.

Measures to improve how leasehold properties are sold

The government is "committed to setting fixed time frames and maximum fees for the provision of leasehold information" and has asked for views as to what those time frames and maximum fees should be.


There are few details of these proposals, which gives the impression they may have been included as a bit of an afterthought. For example, there is no suggestion as to how these provisions would be enforced. Further, the consultation does not attempt to outline what information would need to be provided. Instead it looks as though the government is looking for direction from respondents.

Legislative timetable

Although the government has given no firm commitment as to when legislation is likely to be enacted to cover these proposals, comments within the paper indicate that the proposal may be taken forward in 2019, meaning that any legislation is unlikely to be enacted until mid-2020 at the earliest.


No-one can doubt that the government has good intentions and that it is in everyone's interest that buyers are treated fairly and transparently, not least to retain confidence in our domestic residential market. However, the key proposals (the ban on leasehold houses and the cap on ground rents) will, as outlined, only help new leaseholders. So the big question is what, if anything, is the government thinking of doing to help existing leaseholders? This question is particularly pressing since, the more the government presses home the need for reform, the less attractive existing leasehold houses or residential long leases with escalating ground rents become (whether they were reasonably granted or not) and this potentially makes the situation of those leaseholders worse, not better.

The consultation relates to England only and will close at midnight on 26 November 2018.

Date of ban: there is no firm timetable as to when the ban will come into effect. The consultation paper suggests it could be mid-2020.

Exemption: it appears the government is preparing to exempt: i) shared ownership properties; ii) community-led housing; and iii) inalienable National Trust land and excepted sites on Crown land. It is possible that other exemptions will be agreed before legislation is enacted. The position with exemptions may change by the time draft legislation is produced.

Grant: means the date of completion of the new residential long lease (rather than exchange).

House: the government has yet to provide a definition.

Residential long lease: though not set out explicitly in relation to the ban on leasehold houses, we assume this will be the same as for the cap on ground rents i.e. residential leases granted for a term in excess of 21 years.

*This chart does not consider the proposed cap on ground rents. Further, as these proposals are currently at the consultation stage, we do not have full details of what is being proposed and the resulting legislation may differ. Nothing in this flow chart should be taken as legal advice – if advice is required, please contact your legal adviser.

** Note that there are proposals for the ban to also apply to assignments of leasehold land once the legislation is in force if a house or houses have been developed on that land after the legislation comes into force. At present it is unclear what this is intended to catch.

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
6 Jun 2019, Seminar, Prague, Czech Republic

We cordially invite you to attend a breakfast seminar focusing on issues of bid rigging and private enforcement of competition law.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions