UK: Bank Resolvability: A Redoubling Of Regulatory Efforts

The last few weeks have seen a flurry of activity on the resolvability front. Lest anyone think momentum was seeping out of the decade-long push to make banks resolvable – and thereby end "too big to fail" – these developments suggest a redoubling of regulatory efforts to demonstrate that the framework will work. Each of the initiatives is important in its own right, but taken together they amount to a raising of the bar in terms of resolution preparedness, particularly identifying and dealing with impediments to resolution. Major banks in the UK and the Banking Union can expect greater focus on resolution authorities' assessment of their resolvability – and in the UK, the prospect of this assessment being made public. We have also had a very clear signal from the Bank of England (BoE) of what it expects of major UK banks' valuation capabilities for resolution purposes, and are approaching some key milestones for the Single Resolution Board (SRB)'s multi-year work programme. There continues to be progress on targets for MREL (the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities), albeit with some potential obstacles on the way there. We take the UK, Banking Union, and MREL developments in turn below.

The UK: aiming for the finish line

We start with the BoE, which has been at the forefront of the resolvability agenda over the last decade. The BoE has set itself a deadline by which to make UK banks "fully resolvable": 2022. This target, variously described as "ambitious" and "demanding", will clearly serve to concentrate minds – especially those thinking of applying for the vacancy as head of the BoE's Resolution Directorate. The Independent Evaluation Office's report into the BoE's resolution framework provides clues as to what we can expect, which include that the BoE should introduce intermediate project milestones which should be reflected in banks' resolution plans (see our blog for a summary)

Given the public commitment to full resolvability by 2022, the BoE will be looking to verify that resolvability work is proceeding within banks at the necessary pace, which implies an increase in transparency and assurance. A centrepiece of this will be a new requirement for banks to conduct resolvability self-assessments – elements of which may even be made public. What is certain to be made public is the BoE's own assessment of the resolvability of the major banks. This, then, creates a further dimension to resolvability work: not only do banks need to progress the work itself, some of which is undoubtedly complex and demanding, but they also need to be able to demonstrate that everything is in order – the systems, controls, documentation – to support resolvability. Industry can expect a consultation on a framework for this by the end of this year.

The BoE has also recently finalised its valuation policy. Valuation capabilities have been consistently raised by resolution authorities as a generalised, industry-wide impediment to resolvability. A resolution necessarily involves valuation – especially when bail-in is being contemplated – in order to determine the extent of losses and, thereafter, the recapitalisation resources needed to restore a bank to a going concern. The BoE is the first major resolution authority to publish a policy in this area, and it has set a January 2021 deadline for banks to bring their capabilities up to the expected level. This is no simple task – some of the valuation challenges are significant, particularly in terms of data, and banks will need to document and demonstrate their capabilities in respect of how data will be assembled and used in a prospective resolution scenario. And in resolution-related matters it is often true that where the BoE leads, others will soon follow. Indeed, the SRB continues to work on its own valuation framework, although it remains unclear whether it will publish guidance or adopt a similar approach to the BoE.

The other major pieces of the BoE's work programme to address impediments to resolvability in the run-up to 2022 are not new, but a good deal of implementation work remains. These include the implementation of loss-absorbing capacity rules (MREL and TLAC (Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity), on which more below), funding and liquidity in resolution (where banks and the authorities need to reflect the Financial Stability Board (FSB)'s work in this area), and operational continuity – including access to financial market infrastructures (FMIs) – in resolution. The first major milestone here is the start of 2019, when UK banks need to meet the BoE's rules on operational continuity – while much work has been done here, for example on the revision of SLAs and the implementation of ServCos, remediation and optimisation will carry on past that date.

The Banking Union: looking to close the gap

On the continent, the SRB has previously indicated that work to identify substantive impediments to resolvability would begin in 2018. Identification of impediments will trigger legal requirements for banks to act to address them. The SRB now faces increasing pressure from several directions to complete this work.

In their Meseberg Declaration, France and Germany noted the possibility of the European Stability Mechanism becoming the backstop for the Single Resolution Fund before 2024 (the currently scheduled date), provided that there is sufficient risk reduction before then. It is clear from the text that "risk reduction" includes the building up of subordinated bail-in buffers. Progress will be assessed on the basis of a report from the European Commission, Single Supervisory Mechanism and SRB in 2020.

A recent mediation decision from the European Banking Authority (EBA) adds legal pressure to the mix. The EBA's (first) binding mediation decision between the SRB and the National Bank of Romania is, at first sight, a dry inter-institutional procedural matter, but it has some significant implications which go beyond the scope of the individual decision. In short, the EBA determined that identifying "potential" impediments to resolvability in a resolution plan does not satisfy legislative requirements under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) to assess resolvability. This adds to the pressure on resolution authorities including the SRB to identify substantive impediments to resolvability more concretely, which will trigger the BRRD process requiring banks to make proposals on how to address them. Indeed, the SRB's work on resolvability assessments has begun, and it intends to finalise its policy for identifying substantive impediments by the middle of 2018, with a view to having detailed assessments for each bank by Q1 2019. Brexit may also affect the SRB's work, if a new group of more capital-markets focused subsidiaries of global banks is brought within its remit.

More generally, the SRB has identified a similar set of priorities for resolution planning: as well as progress on loss absorbing capacity (covered below), this includes legal and funding structures, valuation and other information, operational continuity (especially the management of SLAs and other contracts), liquidity and funding, and communication planning.

MREL: still the key

In the UK, the BoE recently updated its individual indicative MREL targets for the six largest UK banking groups and Nationwide (whose target is measured on a leverage ratio basis rather than a risk-weighted basis), together with an indicative average target for a group comprising nine medium-sized, predominantly retail banks and building societies. Relative to last year, most of the banks' individual MREL targets have risen slightly, in the order of 50-100bps, with total MREL targets sitting in the range of 25.7% to 30.4% of RWAs (of which the recapitalisation amounts are between 11.1% and 13.5%). HSBC was alone in seeing its MREL target decline slightly (for its European resolution entity only).

At the same time, the BoE finalised its policy on internal MREL/TLAC, sticking by and large to the FSB's preferred approach, with internal MREL to be scaled at 75%-90% of the full amount of external MREL that a material subsidiary would be required to hold if it were itself a resolution entity. This scaling will take into account the group resolution strategy, the availability of additional uncommitted resources, and the scaling of loss-absorbing resources applied by overseas authorities. For ring-fenced banks which operate within wider groups, there will be a presumption of scaling at 90%, "unless the Bank is satisfied that the wider group has sufficient readily-deployable resources" to justify a lower calibration. There were few changes from the consultation proposals, but one is that the final policy does not require critical service providers delivering the group's critical functions to maintain financial resources equivalent to at least 25% of annual operating costs. Instead the BoE has promised to clarify its approach to loss-absorbing capacity for operational continuity at a later date.

The SRB is proceeding at a similar pace, although so far with less transparency as to the results of any of its bank-specific decision-making on MREL targets. The SRB has, however, said that MREL targets are on average around 26% of RWAs, and that half of the banks it has looked at so far already meet their targets. In terms of the focus for 2018 and 2019, the SRB intends to define MREL targets for major banking groups, with an increasing focus on the quality and the internal location of MREL to ensure there are sufficient subordinated instruments to implement banks' preferred resolution strategies. Binding MREL targets will be set at a consolidated level, and a first identification of MREL targets at a material entity level will be conducted. The SRB has set itself a 2020 deadline for determining binding MREL targets at consolidated and material entity levels for all the banks within its remit.

The fact that targets are being set inevitably brings a focus on how much MREL banks will have to raise. The SRB expects that banks will need to issue €125 billion of additional debt to meet the current shortfall.

MREL gets complicated

The setting of targets represents clear progress. But MREL has never been a simple issue, and several recent developments look set to complicate matters – potential spanners in the works just as the targets are otherwise becoming clearer and potentially closer. First is Brexit: the EBA has asked banks and resolution authorities to satisfy themselves that MREL-eligible instruments issued by EU27 banks under English law will continue to be eligible once the UK leaves the EU (and the same question arises for MREL-eligible instruments issued by UK banks under EU27 laws). If they are not, this would trigger either a renegotiation of the terms of existing debt instruments or the issuance of new eligible debt.

The second spanner has been thrown by the EBA and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) which have flagged the stock of bail-in-able debt held by retail investors as a risk to banks' resolvability. Strictly speaking, having retail investors holding bail-in-able debt is not in and of itself an impediment to resolvability, but in practice large quantities of such holdings are problematic. The SRB has publicly acknowledged as much, pointing out that it "makes banks difficult to resolve for various reasons". In Italy retail investors hold well over €100 billion of bail-in-able debt – more than half of all such retail-held debt in the euro area. Banks for which this is a problem will clearly need to devise a strategy to fix it. In some cases, there may be no better solution than simply issuing new debt subordinated to the existing stock of retail-held instruments. If, in future, banks are unable to sell MREL-eligible debt to retail investors and/or have to issue more MREL-eligible debt which ranks junior to existing debt held by retail investors, this could add materially to their cost of funding.

Third, the BRRD is being revised by the EU legislators, with amendments to MREL a key component of the revisions. These revisions have proven somewhat contentious in the negotiations, and it remains unclear where the legislators will come out. Some outcomes would constrain the discretion of resolution authorities to tailor MREL targets towards individual institutions – to which the SRB has been vocally opposed. And as Elke König said recently, "let us all hope that the new rules will not be overly complex."

A significant forward agenda

These related initiatives add up to a significant forward agenda for resolvability, with further guidance from the BoE and SRB likely on other substantive impediments to resolvability, such as continuity of access to FMIs, with the SRB expected to develop its policy by the end of this year. While we have deliberately limited our focus to the EU, there are linkages to the FSB's ongoing work on resolvability; to developments in the US, Canada, and Japan; and of course to Brexit.

We expect resolution authorities in the EU to demand that banks progress rapidly towards making themselves resolvable, spurred by the knowledge that, ten years on from the collapse of Lehman Brothers, society at large has little appetite for public funds being used to support failing banks. This also implies a need for some critical reflection by resolution authorities on their own levels of preparedness – particularly the adequacy of their approaches to and practices for resolution planning, and the operational efficiency of their crisis management and related cross-border arrangements, including the lessons learned from implementation work to date and recent resolution cases.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions