UK: Court Of Appeal Ruling Shows How Courts Might Handle Global Cartels

Last Updated: 19 April 2018
Article by Robert Bell

The recent judgment considered the effects of complex international supply chains

A ruling in iiyama (UK) Ltd and others v Samsung Electronic Co Ltd and others from the Court of Appeal in the UK is likely to greatly expand the value of damages claimants can recover in future cartel cases.

The case involved two joined appeals in damages actions relating to the liquid crystal display (LCD) and cathode ray tube (CRT) cartels. Both cartels were previously condemned by the European Commission.

The central question before the Court of Appeal was whether the claimants could claim damages in England for losses suffered from buying products at inflated prices outside the EU. They then later imported them into the EU for onward sale and distribution.

The Court of Appeal held that where it is reasonably foreseeable that a foreign cartel will have effects in the EU that are both immediate and substantial, then damages could be claimed under the ‘qualified effects’ doctrine under EU competition law.

Whether that test was satisfied will depend upon a detailed examination of the facts of the case – in particular how the cartel was meant to operate, and how it did.

It was impossible to come to any firm conclusion on the application of this test at an interlocutory, or provisional, stage. The court therefore concluded that the cases should proceed to full trial, where the full facts could be examined.

The facts

On 16 February 2018, the Court of Appeal handed down a judgment on appeals against High Court rulings for two separate actions for damages arising from European Commission decisions on the LCD and CRT cartels.

The cases concerned actions for damages allegedly incurred because of breaches of Article 101(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), a pillar of EU competition law. The breaches were established in two separate European Commission cartel decisions.

“In one action, the relevant purchases made by the claimants were too remotely connected to the cartel in the EEA”

The first was the LCD cartel decision from 8 December 2010. In that decision the commission decided that six manufacturers of LCD panels operated an illegal cartel. This concerned certain LCD panels used in laptops, PC monitors and televisions.

The commission decided that price-fixing and other anti-competitive practices agreed and followed by members of the cartel worldwide and in the European Economic Area (EEA), which includes the EU members and other associated countries, affected direct sales of products into the EEA.

The practices also affected the use of LCD panels in end products manufactured outside the EU but later sold on the EEA market.

The other case involved the CRT cartel, which was condemned by the commission in its decision on 5 December 2012. In that case, the commission decided that eight producers of CRTs had also breached Article 101(1) TFEU by agreeing prices for the supply of colour display tubes incorporated into computer monitors and televisions.

High Court actions

Aggrieved companies that suffered loss and damage because of competition law breaches can bring an action for damages before the national courts of EU member states.

They can rely on the decision of the European Commission as proof of liability, and the only issues before the courts are causation and the amount of damages. These are called ‘follow on actions’.

The European subsidiaries of the iiyama companies, some incorporated in England and Wales, and Mouse Computers Co. Limited, who supplied products bought from the cartels to iiyama, brought two follow on actions in the High Court based on the LCD and CRT Commission decisions.

These claimants are involved in the manufacture, distribution and sale of electronic goods that include LCDs and CRTs.

The defendants in each action were either addressees of the CRT or the LCD decisions, or affiliates, both alleged to have participated in the relevant cartel. Some were UK-based, but most were foreign.

These defendants in the LCD and CRT actions applied before the High Court to have the actions struck out or for summary judgment, on the basis that the English courts had no jurisdiction to hear the actions as the claims related to damages incurred outside the EEA.

“Aggrieved companies can rely on the decision of the European Commission as proof of liability”

In the CRT action the High Court found the defendants were entitled to summary judgment or to have the claims against them struck out. The claimants had not purchased the relevant CRT products within the EU or EEA, and the incorporated products only arrived in Europe, if at all, much later in the supply chain.

The commission’s infringement decision related only to the implementation of the cartel in the EU and EEA, so the relevant purchases made by the claimants were too remotely connected to the cartel in the EEA.

In the LCD action the High Court took a different approach. It dismissed the defendants’ application to strike out the action or order summary judgment, because of the claimants’ argument that the cartel was implemented in the EEA.

However, the court held that insofar as the claimants contended that the implementation of the LCD cartel in Asia – distinct from its implementation in the EEA – had caused them loss, this was not recoverable under Article 101 TFEU.


The claimants in the CRT action and the claimants and some of defendants in the LCD action brought appeals to challenge the orders made at first instance in the High Court. Both appeals were joined and considered together by the Court of Appeal, as they concerned similar issues.

There were two main questions the Court of Appeal had to answer in the appeals. The court first had to decide whether the claimants had a real chance of success in claiming that EU and EEA competition law had been infringed when products had been purchased at inflated prices.

The court then had to judge if the alleged losses can be recovered in the proceedings in England and Wales.

As these appeals were against provisional orders concerning strike out or summary judgment, the court held that it could only strike out the claimants’ case if it appeared that it gave no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim.

It could only grant summary judgment in favour of the defendants if it considered there was no real prospect of the claimants succeeding.

The court said it first needed to consider whether the claims were at least arguably governed by the law of a member state or territory within the EU that itself incorporates EU law. If the claims were exclusively governed by a foreign, non-EU law they would fail, as they were expressed as claims for damages for breach of Article 101 TFEU.

The court concluded that that it would be wrong to determine this issue adversely to the claimants on a summary application, whether by strike out or summary judgment. The court believed it could not safely make the value judgment without fully examining the facts at trial.

The findings in the European Commission decisions were still only in a redacted and incomplete form, and claimants had incomplete disclosure from defendants.

“If the claims were exclusively governed by a foreign, non-EU law they would fail”

In the circumstances, the Court of Appeal was satisfied that the claims were at least arguable and should be determined at trial, on the basis that the applicable law is either English law or the law of some other EU member state.

The court then had to address of the question of jurisdiction. Could the territorial scope of Article 101(1) TFEU be applied to damage suffered by the claimants outside the EEA because they bought products from cartel members later supplied to their subsidiaries in the EEA?

The court held that this damage was recoverable in these proceedings if it was reasonably foreseeable that a foreign cartel would have effects in the EU, which are both immediate and substantial, under the ‘qualified effects’ doctrine.

In these cases it was impossible to decide whether this test was made out at a provisional stage, and their determination is not a suitable case for summary judgment.

Whether the test is satisfied will depend on a full examination of the facts, in particular the intended and actual operation of the cartel. This examination can only take place at a full trial.

Fighting global cartels

The Court of Appeal therefore allowed the claimants’ appeals in both cases and dismissed the defendants’ appeal in the LCD action. Both cases will now proceed to full trial.

If the claimants could prove that the damage suffered by them inside the EEA was both immediate and substantial, they could still recover these losses in the English proceedings, notwithstanding the fact that the claimants initially bought the goods outside the EEA, but then supplied them to their subsidiaries in the EEA for sale and onward distribution.

The approval from the courts for expanding this type of potential loss is a realistic approach to dealing with the way worldwide cartels operate and how global companies procure components and other goods. Ultimately it should boost the size of damages awarded in major cartel cases in the EEA significantly.

Robert Bell is partner at Bryan Cave LLP

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions