UK: Lateral Hires: The Challenges Of Protecting Confidentiality

The challenges posed by lateral hiring have once again been brought to the fore by the replacement in February 2016 of litigation boutique Cooke Young & Keidan (CYK) by Bird & Bird in the highly anticipated GBP 30 million Libor dispute Property Alliance Group ('PAG') v The Royal Bank of Scotland ('RBS').

CYK represented the property investment company PAG in its derivatives mis-selling claim against RBS, which is due to be heard this month. PAG alleges that the bank's misconduct went beyond what has been made public by regulators and asserts that RBS made fraudulent misrepresentations about Libor at a time when the bank's senior executives were aware of problems with the integrity of the benchmark.

RBS served an injunction against CYK to have them removed as PAG's lawyers over alleged issues relating to confidential information arising out of CYK's hire of a junior associate who used to work at Clifford Chance. Michael Cumming-Bruce, a two-and-a-half-year-qualified associate, trained and qualified at Clifford Chance before moving to Carey Olsen for a short spell and was then recruited by CYK. According to reports, RBS alleged that Mr Cumming- Bruce had access to confidential documents concerning RBS while working at Clifford Chance, which it is presumably alleged would be material to the litigation. Commissioned by RBS, Clifford Chance had undertaken an independent review into RBS' global restructuring group (GRG) in 2013, in response to allegations that the GRG had been systematically running small businesses into the ground. The activities of the GRG will be one of the issues in the PAG litigation.

Interestingly, PAG took the initiative, faced with the injunction application by RBS, to replace its representation, perhaps taking the view that they would rather concentrate on preparation for trial than satellite issues (of which there have been many in the course of the litigation).

Although the full facts of the issue in PAG are not known, because the injunction application was never heard, the episode underlines the care around conflicts and confidential information which needs to be taken by firms when hiring not only partners but associates from other firms, and some of the potential consequences of getting it wrong. Often, a lateral hire is sought precisely because of the specific work/client base the individual has, yet this clearly poses a risk of disclosure of confidential client information and can have a ripple effect on a firm's ability to represent existing or prospective clients if an issue is not uncovered and the risks properly managed. Two particularly striking features of the PAG case are the junior level of the associate involved and the fact that his alleged access to relevant confidential documents took place not at his prior firm but at the firm by which he was employed even before that.

Destabilisation tactics

The injunction application could be viewed as a tactical manoeuvre by RBS in an attempt to jeopardise the impending trial date, and/or destabilise PAG at a key stage, and the ability to take such points can be a powerful tool in an opposing party's arsenal. Whilst, fortunately for PAG, the counsel team involved in this instance remains the same, it does still mean that Bird & Bird will have had some very significant work to do in a short space of time in order to prepare fully for the trial. In some circumstances, the cost of bringing a replacement firm up to speed, and/ or dissatisfaction with the eventual outcome of the case as conducted by a firm parachuted in at a late stage, may give rise to knock-on claims or complaints against the ousted firm by its former client. Interestingly, in other litigation against RBS relating to the activities of the GRG, it has recently been reported that a group of claimants, whose retainer of Enyo Law was terminated when Enyo switched to representing a different claimant group, had instructed solicitors to bring a claim over the switch, although the details of the proposed claim are not known; Enyo has reportedly now come off the record for the second group on grounds of conflict of interest relating to its previous relationship with another RBS claimant group.

A regulatory issue

Firms will be familiar with their regulatory duties to avoid conflicts of interest and protect client confidentiality. These include Outcome 4.4 of the Solicitors Regulation Authority ('SRA') Code of Conduct, which generally prevents a firm from acting for a party (party A) in a matter where that party has an interest adverse to that of another client of the firm (party B) about which the firm holds confidential information which is material to party A in the matter. There is an exception to this where (subject to the detailed provisions of Outcome 4.4, as well as the common law – see below) the information can be protected by the use of effective safeguards including information barriers. In the case of former clients, the issue is one of preservation of the confidentiality of the former client's information.

Subject to issues of safeguards, the party who seeks to restrain his former solicitor from acting for another client must show (i) that the professional is in possession of information which is confidential to him and to the disclosure of which he has not consented, and (ii) that the information is or may be relevant to the new matter in which the interest of the other client is or may be adverse to his own. The burden on the former client is not a high one and the duty on a solicitor is unqualified.

Assessing potential client conflicts and safeguarding confidential information

The PAG litigation therefore highlights the possibility that, unless suitable safeguards are put in place, a lateral hire's knowledge of confidential information may effectively be imputed to all of the lawyers in the new firm and disqualify it from ongoing representation. This raises issues about how firms can best protect themselves against such difficulties.

Firms considering hiring laterals (of, as PAG highlights, any level of seniority) should ensure that full due diligence has been undertaken on each individual whom it proposes to hire. Detailed and precise questions should ideally be asked at interview stage or in a questionnaire. In principle, firms should seek, as far as possible, to ascertain:

  1. The clients for whom the candidate worked while at prior firms (not just their current firm);
  2. The nature of the work the candidate performed for each client; and
  3. The identity of clients about whom the candidate learned information.

However, given the confidentiality obligations owed by candidates both to clients and to their former firm(s), in many (if not most) cases this information will be difficult to ascertain, and any questions asked should recognise this. Firms need to think about how to undertake checks which will uncover the risk of issues of the type experienced in PAG without asking candidates to reveal confidential information; for example, firms should consider what information is in the public domain. Consideration should also be given to specific matters which may be impacted: for example, is the hiring firm currently dealing with a matter in which a previous firm of the candidate has at a relevant stage been involved for another known party?

Firms may reach a stage in their due diligence where they cannot ascertain any further information without encouraging breaches of confidentiality. They will then need to stand back and assess whether such issues or potential issues as they have been able to identify can properly be addressed by the putting in place of safeguards including information barriers, and if so how these should operate.

This is no small matter. Whilst in some cases there may be scope for the use of information barriers, caution should be exercised and these should be used only in exceptional circumstances, where sophisticated clients are involved and with stringent procedures put in place. Firms and members of firms may be expected to give undertakings to the affected party, whereby failure to comply may lead to Court and/or regulatory sanctions.

The leading authority in this area is still Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG (1998), in which the House of Lords considered that an effective information barrier needs to be an established part of the organisational structure of the firm, with no risk of disclosure or misuse of confidential information. Ideally, information barriers should involve the complete physical separation of the individuals holding the protected confidential information and may stretch so far as to include restrictions on the ability of those individuals to attend work-related social or business development events and internal meetings, and their ability to discuss matters with unrelated third parties. In some circumstances this may not be a logistical possibility. Examples given in the SRA Handbook of circumstances where it may be difficult to implement effective safeguards are where: the firm is a small one; the physical structure or layout of the firm restricts its ability physically to separate people and documents and thus preserve confidentiality; or clients are not sophisticated users of legal services (an issue potentially most relevant to boutique/mid-sized firms).

Bearing in mind the issues involved both in ascertaining the relevant information about a proposed lateral hire's former work and in implementing effective safeguards and information barriers, there may come a point in some proposed hires where firms may have to take a view as to whether the hire is one with which they can properly proceed, or indeed one which they wish to pursue from a commercial standpoint given the potential issues.

Firms beware

It is unclear whether the junior CYK associate had been involved in the Clifford Chance report, whether this was known about by CYK, whether once at CYK he was assisting with the PAG litigation, or (if so) whether there were any information barriers in place. It is therefore difficult to draw any "lessons learned" from the story. However, the episode undoubtedly shines a light on the importance for firms of checking a lateral hire's background as thoroughly as possible, and ensuring that any knowledge they do have about a potentially adverse client is able to be ring-fenced from the rest of the firm. Unfortunately, both tasks are easier said than done given duties of confidentiality and the rigours of the law on information barriers.

A further difficult question is where firms should draw the line. Should firms apply the same level of rigour to, for example, the hire of newly qualified associates who have trained at other firms, or even work experience students who may have had access to confidential information?

There are no simple solutions to these issues. However, what is clear is that it is becoming ever more important for firms to be aware of the problems that recruiting associates and partners at every level can cause. These should be kept in mind throughout the recruitment process so that all the issues can be considered as fully as possible, decisions both as to hiring and steps to be taken following a hire can be made on a fully informed basis, and potential repercussions (whether loss of a client, reputational issues, claims or regulatory action) can hopefully be avoided.

More broadly, it is possible that CYK's removal from the PAG litigation may have an impact on the appetite of firms for making lateral hires. Views on how welcome or unwelcome this would be are likely to vary. On one hand, some have commented that CYK's removal could have an effect on access to justice in cases against banks by restricting the movement of magic circle associates to litigation boutiques. More generally, associates might be concerned about the restrictive effect on their ability to climb the career ladder by moving laterally across firms. A counter-argument, however, might be that an increased focus on nurturing and training up "home grown" talent could be a positive development in terms of quality within both firms and the profession as a whole.

Lateral Hires: The Challenges Of Protecting Confidentiality

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions