UK: DIFC Court Accepts Jurisdiction In First Judgment On A Reinsurance Dispute

On 24 April 2013 the DIFC Court of First Instance issued an important judgment accepting jurisdiction over a dispute between a DIFC-based reinsurer and an Abu Dhabi based insurance company. The ruling is significant as it involves the first time that the DIFC Court has been required to consider an asserted conflict of jurisdiction with the courts of another Emirate and also its relationship with the jurisdiction of the Union Supreme Court (USC). The DIFC Court also considered the application of the common law doctrine of forum non conveniens in determining the appropriate forum between two different national courts.


The judgment of H.E.Justice Ali Al Madhani decided the issue of the DIFC Court's jurisdiction as a preliminary issue in Allianz Risk Transfer AG (Dubai Branch) v Al Ain Ahlia Insurance Co PSJC.In this case the claimant reinsurer sought declaratory relief under a reinsurance contract entered into in the DIFC relating to claims arising from property damage and business interruption events during Arab Spring in Egypt, which the reinsurer argued were excluded under the original insurance policy and the reinsurance policy. The Defendant challenged the jurisdiction of the DIFC Court to determine the claim on the primary grounds that the Abu Dhabi Courts had jurisdiction; this was on the basis that, in absence of an express jurisdiction clause in the contract, as the defendant was an Abu Dhabi domiciled entity, the UAE Civil Procedure Code vested jurisdiction for the dispute with the Abu Dhabi Courts.  

By the time of the jurisdiction hearing in the DIFC Court the defendant had commenced parallel proceedings (seeking mirror relief) against the claimant in the Abu Dhabi Courts and it had also filed a constitutional petition before the USC requesting that court to intervene - pursuant to the USC's jurisdiction under Article 99(3) of the UAE Constitution - to decide which court had jurisdiction to hear the substantive dispute where there is a conflict of jurisdiction between two Emirate-level courts.


The DIFC Court held that it has jurisdiction to hear Allianz's claim on the basis that it is a DIFC Establishment and therefore jurisdiction is founded under the gateway provisions in Article 5(A)(1) (a) and (b) of Dubai Law No.12 (as amended by Law No.16 of 2011) conferring exclusive jurisdiction to the DIFC Courts in matters involving:

"(a) Civil or commercial claims and actions to which the DIFC or any DIFC Body, DIFC Establishment or Licensed DIFC Establishment is a party;

(b) Civil or commercial claims and actions arising out of or relating to a contract or promised contract, whether partly or wholly concluded, finalised or performed within DIFC or will be performed or is supposed to be performed within DIFC pursuant to express or implied terms stipulated in the contract."

The DIFC Court reaffirmed that the jurisdiction of the DIFC Court is primarily determined by reference to Law No.12, as amended.

In determining jurisdiction in favour of the DIFC Courts, the judge also took into consideration the fact that there had been no written agreement between the parties to opt-out of the DIFC Court's exclusive jurisdiction in relation to the gateway jurisdiction under (a) and (b) above.

In considering the application of forum non conveniens (as relied on by the defendant to support its argument that the Abu Dhabi Courts were the more appropriate forum), while recognising generally the application of the doctrine under DIFC law, the Court held that it is not relevant to determining matters of jurisdiction between two national / domestic courts, and that it did not apply in this case. The DIFC Court held that forum non conveniens is a relevant consideration only where there is a dispute over the jurisdiction between the court seized and one or more international courts. 

No stay of proceedings

The defendant had pleaded as its secondary case that, if the DIFC Court found that it had jurisdiction over the dispute, the court should nonetheless stay the proceedings pending the decision of the USC on the defendant's constitutional petition.  Acknowledging the DIFC Court's status as a UAE Court and the application of the UAE Constitution to the DIFC and those within it, the DIFC Court noted that the defendant's petition to the USC (asserting a conflict of jurisdiction) had been filed before either the DIFC Court or the Abu Dhabi Courts had ruled on their own jurisdiction, respectively (and that, in fact, the petition had been filed even before the defendant had commenced its claim in the Abu Dhabi Courts).  

At the time of the hearing of the jurisdiction application in the DIFC Court the Abu Dhabi Courts had not ruled on their own jurisdiction over the defendant's claim and the USC had not issued judgment on the defendant's petition.  Before the judgment of H.E. Justice Ali Al Madhani was issued the USC issued judgment dismissing the defendant's petition on the basis that it had been brought prematurely as there was no actual conflict of jurisdiction; for this to exist there would have to be two final conflicting judgments over jurisdiction in the DIFC Courts and the Abu Dhabi Courts. It was recognised that the two courts said to be in conflict could in fact reach the same conclusion on jurisdiction, in which case there would be no conflict at all. 

The DIFC Court refused to stay the proceedings brought before it by Allianz notwithstanding that the Abu Dhabi Court proceedings were continuing in parallel, whilst recognising that this would have consequences in terms of costs for the parties.


The Allianz judgment is welcomed as it affirms the grounds on which the gateway jurisdiction of the DIFC Court can be asserted.  It also demonstrates the DIFC Court's approach to the area of potential conflict of jurisdiction between the DIFC Court and the courts of other Emirates. The DIFC Court has asserted its standing as another court within the UAE legal system. The judgment is also interesting from a constitutional law perspective, insofar as there were arguments made before the Court in reliance on UAE law and on related constitutional proceedings before the USC, and in terms of the Court's comments on the application of forum non conveniens to inter-Emirate jurisdictional considerations.  

While the Allianz case arose in a reinsurance context, and is the first judgment where a number of these issues have been considered in the DIFC Court, it is likely that other similar cases may arise where, on different facts, the DIFC Court may be required to consider further its constitutional obligations and its application of the forum non conveniens doctrine. 

Clyde & Co LLP acted for the successful claimant in this matter.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions