A French court has found Houston-based Continental Airlines guilty of involuntary manslaughter for its part in the 2000 Concorde crash which killed 113 people. The Airline has been fined 200,000 Euros and ordered to pay 1m Euros in damages to Concorde's operator, Air France.

John Taylor, a mechanic for Continental Airlines has also been found guilty and has been given a 15-month suspended jail sentence. Mr Taylor stood trial along with four other individuals, who were all later acquitted. One of them was the former chief of maintenance for Continental, whilst the others were French-ex officials, including Concorde's former chief engineer. All five individuals on the stand had denied the charges against them.

The ruling comes over a decade after the crash, which happened just outside Paris on 25 July 2000. The trial began in February 2010, following a request from a French public prosecutor in 2008 for judges to begin manslaughter charges against Continental and the individuals. It is believed that investigators produced over 80,000 documents to the court during their investigations into the crash.

The official report into the crash, which was published in December 2004, found that a piece of metal fell from a DC-10 plane run by Continental, which had taken off from Paris Charles de Gaulle airport just before the Concorde jet took off. The jet hit the titanium strip and one of the plane's tyres burst, causing rubber to fly up and rupture a fuel tank, which then burst into flames. John Taylor had used titanium parts to make repairs to the DC-10. The judge confirmed that the titanium debris was to blame for the crash and found that Mr Taylor should have used a softer metal such as aluminium, as titanium was known to be too dangerous for aeroplane tyres.

Continental's lawyers have disputed the Court's findings, arguing that the Concorde jet caught fire before hitting the titanium strip. They have stated that they will appeal the verdict, describing it as "absurd" and stating that it "only protects French interests".

The court has also ruled that Continental should pay 70% of any compensation claims to the families of the victims. Aerospace group EADS, who built the supersonic airliner, has been asked to pay the remaining 30%. This could potentially expose Continental and EADS to damages claims of tens of millions of Euros if insurance companies seek reimbursement for sums already paid out.

Air France is separately seeking 15m euro in damages from Continental in a civil action, which was delayed pending the outcome of the criminal trial.

As Concorde flights ground to a halt in 2003, the impact of this verdict is likely to be measured by the reputational damage it causes Continental. It will also be interesting to see what impact (if any) this verdict will have on health and safety regulations in the aviation setting.

To see our original Law Now on the trial, please click here

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 08/12/2010.