Turkey: Is "Lesser Duty Rule" A Tightrope Walker's Pole In International Trade Remedies Law Of Turkey?

Last Updated: 5 September 2017
Article by Ertuğrul Can Canbolat LL.M. and Cansi Catak

1. Introduction

The recent developments in the case law have led the trade remedy law practitioners to bring the Turkish Ministry of Economy's ("Ministry") approach towards the implementation of the "lesser duty rule" to their agenda. There are deep concerns and raising voices of the interested stakeholders from both sides (domestic industry and foreign traders) as to the benefits and drawbacks of its application.

From the very beginning of the implementation process of the WTO rules into members' legislations, the nature, aim and ground of the "lesser duty rule" as well as its effectiveness have been heavily criticised and accordingly, the approaches pursued by the legislators and competent authorities fluctuated significantly in various jurisdictions. As a reminder, the "lesser duty rule" refers to the cases where the injury caused by dumped or subsidised imports could be removed by imposition of a duty lesser than the calculated dumping margin or amount of subsidy. In the application of the lesser duty provision, the core issue is legal ambiguity regarding whether the authorities may exercise a great deal of discretion or they are obliged just to adopt an approach favouring the application of the "lesser duty rule".

In this regard, members of the WTO, especially those which have adopted a relatively strict trade policy, have been focusing on the "lesser duty rule" from more protective perspective and enjoying the opportunity of using the option arising from the wording of "desirable" in the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 ("Anti-Dumping Agreement"). On the other hand, some of the WTO members promoting the continuous application of the "lesser duty rule" by their competent authorities have been discussing the determination of the potential cases where non-application of the concerned rule may help to create an effective way by outweighing its benefits and drawbacks.1 With a view to achieving the business perspective, others encourage the public to disclose its opinion on this issue.

Albeit the various existing approaches, it is undeniable that the "lesser duty rule" can be used as a tool to balance the contradicting interests of both domestic industries and exporting/importing entities, as well as to ensure the public/consumer welfare.

2. The "Lesser Duty Rule" at the International Level

Anti-Dumping Agreement. Article 9 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement sets out that "it is desirable that the imposition be permissive in the territory of all Members, and that the duty be less than the margin if such lesser duty would be adequate to remove the injury to the domestic industry". In other words, the nature of the "lesser duty rule" under Article 9 is not an obligation but rather an option for the WTO members to transpose this rule into their national legislations in ensuring fair competition by preventing so-called trade distortions; however, at the same time, this provision does evince its desirability of adopting this principle. As a result, the Anti-Dumping Agreement grants whole discretion to the WTO member countries in their application and transposition of this issue into their national legislations.

EU rules. Under the acquis2 "the amount of the anti-dumping duty shall not exceed the margin of dumping established but it should be less than the margin if such lesser duty would be adequate to remove the injury to the Community industry." The acquis limits the applicable remedy. The underlying reason of transposing the "lesser duty rule" into the EU law is that it is sufficient to remedy the injury suffered by the EU industry which is lower than the dumping margin. In other words, the EU authorities have recognised the "lesser duty rule" in cases where anti-dumping/countervailing duties are lesser than the dumping/subsidy margin and the injury margin. In fact, the earlier anti-dumping cases in the EU prove that the EU authorities have consistently resorted to the "lesser duty rule". The main rationale for this lies in the aim (i) not to punish the exporters (at dumped prices) for the non-injurious parts of their practices, (ii) to assure the public interest in general, and/or (iii) to create fewer distortions to the current market competition.

As an example, regarding "imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the PRC", the Council of the EU stated3;

"In view of conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and union interest and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, it is considered that definitive anti-dumping measures should be imposed on imports of crystalline silicon PV modules or panels and cells of the type used in crystalline silicon modules or panels, originating in or consigned from the PRC at the level of lower of the dumping and the injury margin found, in accordance with the lesser duty rule. In this case, the duty rate should accordingly be set at the level of the injury margins found."

However, it is still very controversial whether the EU authorities are required to do so. Some of the practitioners claim that "the word 'should' cannot, in law, be the basis of a mandatory rule. The word 'should' is conditional and gives to the competent authority the possibility to impose a duty at less than the dumping margin".4 Furthermore, it may be asserted that the eagerness of the EU authorities in former cases does not reveal or render this practice as mandatory or put emphasis upon the potential negative effect of it on the consumer welfare in the long-term perspective despite its short-term benefits.

3. The "Lesser Duty Rule" under the Turkish Trade Remedy Laws

Similarly, Article 7 of the Turkish Law on the Prevention of Unfair Competition in Imports ("Turkish Law") regulates the "lesser duty rule" as follows:

"An amount equal to the margin of dumping or the amount of subsidy, specified by the Board and approved by the Ministry consequent to the investigation, shall be imposed on dumped imports as anti-dumping duty and on subsidized imports as countervailing duty, respectively. However, where it is determined that a rate or amount of duty lesser than the calculated dumping margin or amount of subsidy would be adequate to remove the injury caused by dumped or subsidized imports, such lesser rate or amount shall be imposed."

As seen, the Turkish Law applies the "lesser duty rule", namely the amount of the anti-dumping duty shall not exceed the dumping margin but should be less if such lesser duty would be adequate to remove the (threat of) injury. Contrary to the wording used in the mentioned above Article 9(4) of the EU Regulation, the relevant article of the Turkish Law includes the "shall" wording. At the same time, the law also enables the Ministry to enjoy discretion by using the wording "adequate". Therefore, it appears that the above-stated provision obliges the Ministry to impose an anti-dumping duty at less than the calculated margin of dumping if such lesser duty would be adequate to remove the injury to the domestic industry.

As a matter of fact, the Ministry has systematically applied the "lesser duty rule" and thus, there has been a considerable number of cases5 of the Ministry where the anti-dumping measures were based on injury margin (which is determined by a comprehensive analysis of the domestic industry's economic indicators and the effect of the dumped imports on the domestic industry's pricing tendency/progress such as price undercutting, price depression and suppression), when the level of the dumping margin exceeded what was necessary to remove the injury suffered and eventually the Ministry applied the lesser duty. In its recent case concerning the imports of "phthalic anhydride" products originating in South Korea, the Ministry determined the dumping margin as 15% of the CIF value, however, following the evaluation of the investigation report, which included the recommendation to apply the lesser duty, it reached the conclusion to impose a measure of 8.44% of the CIF value (almost half of the calculated dumping margin).

4. Conclusion

The Turkish legislation seems quite clear and it is uncontroversial that the Ministry is vested to take anti-dumping measures to eliminate or mitigate injury caused by dumping. Accordingly, the Ministry should distinguish the injurious and non-injurious effects of the dumping and depending on that, decide on the respective measure with a possibility to invoke the lesser duty in order to ensure that the measure does not exceed what is necessary to remedy the injury caused. Indeed, unlike Article 9 (4) of the EU Regulation, the relevant article of the Turkish Law includes the "shall" wording and accordingly, the application of the "lesser duty rule" appears to be mandatory in Turkey. In many of its investigations, the Ministry has adopted an approach to apply the "lesser duty rule".

Additionally, in order to guarantee the right to defence of the interested parties in favour of/against the application of the lesser duty, any injury calculation should be made and reflected properly. In other words, the transparency/availability of such calculations to the interested parties to a certain degree is required. Otherwise, the injury calculation method and the lack of transparency/openness in relation to such calculation method may overshadow the application of the "lesser duty rule" which can assure the right balance between both parties' interests as well as the free market economy rules.


1. Laurent Ruessmann, "Modernisation of the European Union Trade Defence System – Reform De Jure and De Facto", http://www.fieldfisher.com/media/1909600/AJCCL-Europe.pdf

2. Paragraph 4 of Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union

3. Paragraph 414 of Proposal for a Council Implementing Regulation imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China

4. Bernard O'Connor, "There is no lesser duty in EU trade defence law", http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=03c49e52-f5e8-4602-9ad7-5b779ec2d666

5. See for instance, Article 29 of the Communiqué on the Prevention of Unfair Competition in Imports (No. 2004/22); Article 27 of the Communiqué on the Prevention of Unfair Competition in Imports (No. 2006/2); Article 24 of the Communiqué on the Prevention of Unfair Competition in Imports (No. 2011/1); Article 36 of the Communiqué on the Prevention of Unfair Competition in Imports (No. 2013/17); Article 37 of the Communiqué on the Prevention of Unfair Competition in Imports (No. 2014/2); Para. 4 of Article 15 of the Communiqué on the Prevention of Unfair Competition in Imports (No. 2015/21); Article 33 of the Communiqué on the Prevention of Unfair Competition in Imports (No. 2015/23); Article 24 of the Communiqué on the Prevention of Unfair Competition in Imports (No. 2015/44); Article 25 of the Communiqué on the Prevention of Unfair Competition in Imports (No. 2016/11); Article 30 of the Communiqué on the Prevention of Unfair Competition in Imports (No. 2016/15); Article 26 of the Communiqué on the Prevention of Unfair Competition in Imports (No. 2016/27)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions