South Africa: Who Is A Prescribed Officer?

Last Updated: 8 August 2012
Article by Ian Cox

The 2008 Companies Act (the new act) defines a prescribed officer as:

"a person who, within a company, performs any function that has been designated by the Minister in terms of section 66 (10)."

The definition is important because the new act extends to prescribed officers the obligations which a director owes to a company under section 75 and 76, and thus the risk of liability that is described in section 77.

Unfortunately the Minister did not designate any functions in the ordinary sense when he exercised his powers under section 66(10). Regulation 38 describes a prescribed officer in the following terms:

"Despite not being a director of a particular company, a person is a 'prescribed officer' of the company for all purposes of the Act if that person—

  1. exercises general executive control over and management of the whole, or a significant portion, of the business and activities of the company; or
  2. regularly participates to a material degree in the exercise of general executive control over and management of the whole, or a significant portion, of the business and activities of the company."

The phrase "general executive control" is not defined nor has the term been considered by our courts. There is also a similar lack of clarity with part (b) of the designation.

Hence the question, what is a prescribed officer?

I suppose the question could just as easily be asked whether regulation 38 is a proper exercise of the Minister's powers under section 66(10) and thus whether prescribed officers in fact exist under South African law at the present time. I don't think the Minister has properly exercised his powers but this is only my opinion. This is a further addition to the growing pile of questions which will have to be dealt with by the legislature or the courts.

In the meantime we need to try and make some sense of this. So what can one say about the definition of a prescribed officer?

I think the definition is very narrow, bearing in mind the issue it is trying to address. I am referring to the idea that companies must be managed by or under the direction of the board of directions. This is, I believe, what is meant by general executive control. The board of directors exercises general executive control in the majority of South African companies. However this is not normally the case with the large companies and their subsidiaries that for the most part drive the South African economy. The main board of these holding companies usually supervises the professional managers who exercise executive management control. These managers may or may not be directors as well. They need not be employed or even work inside the company. It is not unusual for executive management control of a subsidiary to be exercised by employees at the group head office, the senior management of the subsidiary playing the role of functionaries with limited discretionary decision-making ability. Indeed in many cases the board of directors of these subsidiaries operates as a rubber stamp for the decisions of the main board or executive management.

I assume that the purpose of having prescribed officers is to bring those managers who exercise executive power into the same net as directors insofar as the standard of their conduct and their liability is concerned. After all if you in fact exercise the kind of power that is ordinarily exercised by the board of directors then you should be subject to the same duties and risk.

The trouble is that this is easier said than done especially in the case of corporate legislation that is intended to regulate all companies from the smallest mom and pop operation to the local presence of the largest multinational corporation.

Where do you draw the line? Do you try to bring what is in essence the exercise of power by a dominant shareholder into the net as the British, Australian and New Zealand acts have tried to do or do you limit its application to designated functions within the company as the Canadian act has done?

I think the legislature had the Canadian model in mind. The Canadian Corporations Act defines an "officer" as:

"an individual appointed as an officer under section 121, the chairperson of the board of directors, the president, a vice-president, the secretary, the treasurer, the comptroller, the general counsel, the general manager, a managing director, of a corporation, or any other individual who performs functions for a corporation similar to those normally performed by an individual occupying any of those offices".

However the Minister seems to have had other ideas and this I submit is where the problem with the present definition lies. The result in my view is a definition that is very limited in its scope.

In my opinion:

  1. The reference to "inside the company" excludes those head office officials who by the exercise of shareholder dominance in fact exercise "general executive control over and management of the whole, or a significant portion, of the business and activities of the company".
  2. The reference to the exercise of "general executive control over and management of the whole, or a significant portion, of the business and activities of the company" excludes those senior managers who notwithstanding their titles are in fact subject to the direction and control of others. This will largely exclude the senior management of subsidiaries. Indeed in my view the definition of a prescribed officer will for the most part only have relevance in head office situations where the board does not exercise "general executive control".
  3. It is true that part (b) of the regulation has the potential to widen the scope of the definition. However if I am right in saying that what is meant by "general executive control" has to be determined in the context of how the board of directors exercises its powers, then part (b) merely extends the definition to those cases where a committee exercises those powers rather than an individual. Part (b) thus applies to cases where the company is run by an executive committee.

It is unfortunate that confusion exists about who is and who is not a prescribed officer. Designation has very important consequences for the employment relationship as well as the designated employee's exposure to risk. The clear line that exists between the duties owed by an employee and those owed by a director is that the former has no right to be informed and is obliged to obey the lawful instructions of his or her employer whereas the latter has a right to be informed and is obliged to exercise his or her independent judgement. It is vital that the managers and employer know in advance of the manager's enhanced rights and obligations and respect them.

It would be sensible for Companies to formally recognise prescribed officers, to ensure that they receive the same consideration and status as members of the board and are insured against claims just as directors are.

The uncertainty generated by the definition means that companies are going to have to adopt a practical approach to identifying prescribed officers. Unfortunately they are going to have to do this largely unaided by any legal precedent or authority. The scheme underlying the designation of prescribed officers in the new act is unique to South Africa. The concept of a prescribed officer was a late inclusion in the development of the new act, it seems as a result at least in part of representations made by the Law Society of South Africa who complained that the bill, unlike the British companies act, made no provision for so-called shadow directors. No mention was made of the term in the explanatory memorandum to the 2007 bill. It appeared in the 2008 bill but as no explanatory memorandum accompanied that bill, it is difficult to determine the thinking and purpose underlying its inclusion with any degree of confidence. Henochsburg suggests corporations could be prescribed officers and that it was intended to apply to what are termed shadow directors and the company secretary. I do not, with respect, think this can be correct. The notion of a juristic person owing duties as if it were a director does injury to the personal and inherently human nature of those duties. The duties assigned to a company secretary in section 86 are in any event inimical to the exercise or participation to a material degree in the "general executive control over and management of the whole, or a significant portion, of the business and activities of the company". The scheme which underlies the idea behind shadow directors in the British companies act was not followed in this country so the term shadow director is also inappropriate, in my respectful opinion.

There is an urgent need for a proper analysis of exactly what is trying to be achieved with prescribed officers and a realignment of the new act to precisely meet that need. The current situation has a huge potential to place senior managers in a situation where they do not know if they are fish or fowl.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions