South Africa: CCMA Guidelines On Misconduct Arbitrations: Part 4

Last Updated: 20 February 2012
Article by Alex Ferreira and Louietta Du Toit
Most Read Contributor in South Africa, September 2019

This is the fourth article in a series of articles meant to advise litigants who may have to arbitrate before the CCMA after 1 January 2012, in the face of the new "Guidelines on Misconduct Arbitrations" ("the Guidelines") which were published by the CCMA during September 2011 and which became effective on 1 January 2012.

The purpose of this article is to examine those sections of the Guidelines which advise arbitrators on how to approach and assess substantive fairness in arbitration proceedings relating to misconduct.

An arbitrator's assessment of substantive fairness should be in accordance with the guidelines contained in item 7 of the Code of Good Practice: Dismissal ("the Code"), which obliges an arbitrator to conduct a series of factual enquiries to determine this question.

item 7 of the code

The Guidelines describe in detail the following distinct factual enquiries that flow from the provisions of Item 7 of the Code:

  • Is there a rule?
  • Was the employee aware of the rule?
  • Did the employee contravene the rule?
  • Is the rule or standard a valid or reasonable rule or standard?
  • Was the dismissal an appropriate sanction?

is there a rule?

At the outset it is necessary to prove whether or not there was, in fact, an existing rule or standard in the particular workplace which the employee in question is alleged to have contravened. Should the existence of a rule be disputed, then the arbitrator may decide that dispute either based on the evidence presented, based on the credibility of the opposing witnesses, or the balance of probabilities. The arbitrator may also determine this issue by means of judicial notice: this means to accept something which is clearly well known or indisputable as a proven fact. A rule at the workplace forbidding theft or assault, for example, is clearly something which the arbitrator may automatically accept as proven, by means of judicial notice, without having to require the employer to specifically prove same.

The Guidelines provide that the existence of a rule or standard may be proved in the following ways:

  • in terms of what is contained in a disciplinary code, collective agreement, contract or policy;
  • by way of testimony (given by one or more witnesses to that effect);
  • by way of inference from a contract, legislation or an established practice in the particular sector or establishment;
  • accepted as a basic or "universal" rule of conduct applicable in all workplaces, such as the duties inherent to a contract of employment regarding performance, good order and trust; and/or
  • in terms of any special rules that may flow from the particular industry or sector concerned, or the specific nature of the particular employer's operations.

The nature of the sector or workplace is a relevant consideration given that, for example, a stricter standard of compliance is required in a workplace which poses a high risk to safety or security, such as a mine or an airline.

If a rule is not specifically contained in a disciplinary code, but is also not specifically excluded as a ground for discipline, the Guidelines nevertheless permit an arbitrator to rely on such rule or standard, provided that:

  • it is either proved by the employer, or conceded by the employee, that the employee knew or ought to reasonably have known that the rule or standard was applicable; or
  • the arbitrator is able to infer that the rule or standard was applicable from the disciplinary code, contract, legislation or an established practice in the sector or particular establishment.

The source of a particular rule is also a relevant aspect to consider at further stages of the enquiry, such as when determining whether or not the employee was aware of the rule. It goes without saying that the enquiry into the alleged misconduct will not proceed any further if the existence of the rule itself cannot be proven at this first stage.

was the employee aware of the rule?

Item 3(1) of the Code requires that "[a]n employer's rules must create certainty and consistency in the application of discipline. This requires that the standards of conduct are clear and made available to employees in a manner that is easily understood" (our emphasis). Accordingly, should the employee dispute his or her knowledge of the particular rule, the employer will in turn have to refute this in order to prove the requirement that the employee was in fact aware of the existing rule.

If there is no disciplinary code in the particular workplace, it must then be determined whether the employee could reasonably be expected to have known of the rule or standard. The Guidelines stipulate that this question may be addressed either in terms of the evidence presented, or based on the expertise of the arbitrator. It is important to note that item 3(1) of the Code also determines that "[s]ome rules or standards may be so well established and known that it is not necessary to communicate them". This means that an employee is expected to at least be aware of the basic and self-evident rules of the workplace.

did the employee contravene the rule?

An employee may or may not concede to having contravened the rule or standard. If the employee does not concede to the contravention, this question must then be determined in terms of the evidence respectively lead by both parties. The contravention of an existing rule is a purely factual enquiry and the evidence lead by the opposing parties must thus relate to the facts of the particular matter.

After evidence has been presented in this regard, the arbitrator must summarise and analyse it, and then determine the question based on the credibility of the witnesses, and/or on the balance of probabilities of two competing versions.

This factual enquiry in itself may involve an additional range of factual determinations, such as, for example, whether or not the employee is able to justify the contravention, despite the fact that the employer may have proved the contravention, or that the employee may have conceded to contravening the rule.

is the rule or standard a valid or reasonable rule or standard?

In accordance with the Code, it is not the arbitrator's role to "second-guess" the rules and standards set by the employer in the workplace. The determination of the rules themselves is the employer's prerogative and the intention is not that the arbitrator should interfere with this. Instead, in the process of enquiring into the fairness of the dismissal, the arbitrator should simply determine whether the particular rule is valid and reasonable.

The determination of validity entails considering whether the rule or standard is unlawful, or contrary to public policy. It would, for example, not be lawful (and thus invalid) to instruct an employee to do work clearly outside the agreed scope of his or her duties. The implication is that the "contravention" of an invalid or unlawful rule would be justifiable, such as when an employee refuses to comply with an unlawful instruction.

An arbitrator is also required to decide whether a particular rule is reasonable. This is, unfortunately, something of a subjective determination, and should thus be tempered by an acceptance that it is the employer's prerogative to determine rules for the workplace. The test for reasonableness must be distinguished from the test for fairness – the latter test only becomes applicable later in the analysis, in order to determine the fairness of dismissal as a sanction.

The Guidelines do not elaborate much on how reasonableness should be determined, except to state that it may involve a comparison with sectoral norms. An employer would thus have to justify a departure from the generally accepted standard of conduct expected from employees in his or her sector.

was the dismissal an appropriate sanction?

The question is whether, in the circumstances, it was fair for the employer to impose the sanction of dismissal, with reference to either the particular instance of misconduct itself, or to the cumulative effect of various instances of misconduct.

In light of all the relevant circumstances (as detailed in the diagram below), the arbitrator must, at this stage, make a value judgment about the fairness of the employer's decision to impose the sanction of dismissal. The Guidelines require that the following be kept in mind when making this value judgment:

  • the interests of both the employer and the employee, for the purposes of making a balanced and equitable assessment;
  • the employer's rules and standards must be considered in a serious light and the arbitrator should endeavour to understand the reasoning behind them;
  • norms in the sector;
  • the Code;
  • the Guidelines; and
  • the expertise of the arbitrator.

These multiple considerations at this stage can be illustrated as follows:


Arbitrators are obliged to take the Guidelines into account and, accordingly, parties are advised to be mindful of the Guidelines in relation to the manner in which an arbitrator assesses substantive fairness during the course of an arbitration relating to misconduct.

The determination of substantive fairness in accordance with item 7 of the Code, read with the Guidelines, clearly requires a comprehensive factual analysis, consisting of the various inter-related factual enquiries discussed above. Litigants are advised to be aware of the respective stages of the process and also of what each of these stages require, so that they may be able to prepare and present their case accordingly. Such knowledge will also place them in a position to evaluate whether or not the arbitrator is conducting the assessment in accordance with the Guidelines, and paying the necessary attention to the various factual determinations which need to be made.

By assessing the conduct of the arbitrator in determining substantive fairness with reference to the Guidelines, a party may be able to more easily prove that the arbitrator exceeded his powers, committed misconduct in relation to his duties and/or committed a gross irregularity in the conduct of the proceedings. In terms of Section 145 of the LRA, such grounds might constitute a defect in the arbitration proceedings, rendering the arbitration award reviewable.

With this in mind, the Guidelines should serve as an essential and practical yardstick against which to measure the assessment and determination of substantive fairness by arbitrators, after 1 January 2012.

*This is the fourth article in a series of articles on the new CCMA Guidelines for Misconduct Arbitrations. For the first article please see this article, for the second see this article, and for the third see this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions