Searching Content indexed under Court Procedure by David Anthony ordered by Published Date Descending.
Links to Result pages
Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument Involving Rule 23(f) Interlocutory Appeals
The United States Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in the case of Microsoft Corp. v. Baker, where the Court is set to determine whether a plaintiff can tactically circumvent Rule 23(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
United States
4 May 2017
Lawmakers In U.S. House Of Representatives Considering Bill That Would Reform Class Action Litigation Under Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 23
On February 9, 2017, Judiciary Committee Chair Bob Goodlatte (R.-Va.), introduced H.R. 985, the Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017 ("the Act").
United States
5 Apr 2017
Improper Form Of Background Check Disclosure Not Sufficient Injury For Standing
Ever since the Supreme Court decided Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins last year, courts have been struggling to define the contours of standing in "no injury" class actions.
United States
22 Mar 2017
Court Denies Background Screener's Spokeo Motion Related To Address History Reporting
On February 13, a judge in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied a background screening company's motion to dismiss a putative Fair Credit Reporting Act...
United States
1 Mar 2017
'Spokeo' Starts To Show Its Effects
On May 16, 2016, the Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins.
United States
20 Jun 2016
Supreme Court Deems Statistical Evidence Admissible In Class Action
In March, the Supreme Court, in a 6-2 decision, held in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphekeo that the district court did not err in certifying and maintaining a class of employees who alleged violations...
United States
4 May 2016
Supreme Court Will Allow U.S. To Participate In Spokeo Oral Argument
On September 8, the United States Solicitor General requested leave from the U.S. Supreme Court to participate in oral argument in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, as amicus curiae.
United States
2 Nov 2015
Second Circuit Holds That Federal Court Retains Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under CAFA Even After Plaintiff's Amendment To Remove Class Action Allegations
In In Touch Concepts, Inc. d/b/a ZCOM v. Cellco Partnership, the Second Circuit joined the Seventh Circuit in holding that a federal court retains subject matter jurisdiction over a case that had previously been removed to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act.
United States
23 Jun 2015
Links to Result pages