Jersey: The Bribery Act 2010 – Its Provisions And Implications


1. The UK's new Bribery Act has been long in the making. After much debate and speculation, sometimes informed and sometimes not, it is to come into force later this summer, namely on 1 July 2011. It represents a determined assault on corrupt practices, taking an approach which is more severe and extensive in its reach than comparable legislation elsewhere, including even the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

2. That much is apparent from the terms of the new Act which, briefly expressed: _ give clearer statutory definition to the general offences of bribery;

  • Create the new offence of bribing a foreign public official;
  • Create the new offence of failure, on the part only of commercial organizations, to prevent bribery;
  • Apply to both the public and the private sectors;
  • Do not permit 'facilitation payments';
  • Have overwhelming reach, applying as they do i) to any transactions which take place in the UK; ii) to all UK residents, companies, partnerships and citizens transacting anywhere in the world; iii) to non-UK-based companies which carry on business in the UK;

3. Based on that summary alone, the observation that the Act utterly transforms the English law of bribery involves no overstatement. As can already be seen in outline, it re-defines the nature of bribery itself; it expressly criminalises the bribery of foreign public officials; it enacts a new corporate offence by virtue of which companies will become criminally liable if bribes are paid by its employees or agents (unless 'adequate procedures' are in place to provide safeguards against such payments); it widens UK jurisdiction over offences committed abroad in ways which extend the usual bases of legal jurisdiction; the uplift of maximum penalties to a 10 year maximum reflects its overall determination.


4. As to the new offence of bribery, no longer does the recipient have to be in a specific public position. Both the 'taking' and 'receiving' offences will, subject to available defences, apply within a business to those with even constructive knowledge of a bribe. Individuals seeking to ignore the realities by simply looking the other way are at personal risk, as is the company itself under the new corporate offence provisions.


5. The jurisdictional reach of the Act is of course one of its vital features. That reach, as regards different provisions, extends to:

Anyone, of any nationality, who does something in furtherance of a bribery offence which occurs in UK;

  • Citizens of the UK or British Overseas Territories, wherever resident, and wherever the act in question takes place. (It may be relevant to notice in the offshore financial context that the 14 British Overseas Territories include Bermuda, BVI, Cayman Islands, Gibraltar and Turks and Caicos Islands)
  • Residents of the UK, whatever their nationality, even if the act in question takes place outside UK
  • UK incorporated companies / partnerships wherever the act in question takes place;
  • Non – UK incorporated corporate entities carrying on even part of their business in the UK;
  • ('act' in this context should be taken to include a relevant omission.)

6. The drafting is not easily digestible but s.7 as regards corporate entities and s.12 as regards territorial jurisdiction over individuals and UK incorporated bodies repay careful analysis.


7. The personal liability provisions are certain to be of important effect. Even if a board were sufficiently misguided to countenance hiding corrupt payments by means of off-the-books slush fund accounts or shell companies or otherwise to facilitate bribes within some hole and corner corporate accounting, the personal liability provisions are now likely to amount to a real deterrent. An analogue may well be provided by the US proceedings under which Siemens AG and three subsidiaries pleaded guilty to offences under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

8. The directors on both the managing and supervisory boards were subject to internal investigation for failing to provide compliance oversight. They had to repay the company millions of dollars. Many Siemens executives were also investigated by the German criminal authorities with the consequent stress and disruption which that entailed.


9. The non-exemption for facilitation payments (i.e. payments to expedite or secure the performance of a routine governmental action) was logically to be expected, whatever the practical difficulties to which that gives rise on the ground. The proposition, realistic or otherwise, is that in the longer term the expectations of government officials in relevant jurisdictions will be changed.


10. Another vital feature is the introduction of the new corporate offence. Usually, subject to limited exceptions, corporate criminal liability arises only where the owner of 'the directing mind' of the company has been involved and has personal criminal liability. Under the terms of the Act, however, if an employee, officer or agent of a commercial organization pays a bribe in connection with the organization's business, then the organization becomes criminally liable. That liability is subject to the defence that the organisation had 'adequate procedures' in place to prevent bribery.

11. The Act does not define 'adequate procedures' but by virtue of s.9 of the Act the Secretary of State must publish guidance about procedures that relevant commercial organisations can put in place to prevent persons associated with them from bribing as mentioned in section 7(1). The Ministry of Justice has issued such guidance. It is based on 6 key principles namely proportionality, top level commitment, risk assessment, due diligence; communication; monitoring/review. In brief, adequate procedures to defend the business against a charge of failing to prevent bribery will comprise the application of a risk based approach to identify potentially dangerous areas within the business and devising and implementing controls which are appropriate to meet those dangers.

12. It is fairly to be said that in this aspect the Act displays sensitivity to the needs of business in allowing the business to identify its own risks and counter measures. The guidance establishes broad principles and allows the business to devise risk based solutions specific to itself. This stands in contrast to the steps-specific base of comparable provisions in the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which now dates back as far as 1977.


13. In addition to the guidance issued by the Ministry of Justice, the Serious Fraud Office has stated its position.

14. In July 2009 it issued important guidance on its priorities in pursuing bribery offences. It said that overseas bribery investigations are a priority and are attracting significant resources. It estimates that a third of its workload is concerned with overseas corruption. It will consider imposing only civil penalties in cases of self reporting of bribery by the company. However, such leniency will depend on all of the circumstances, including corporate contrition evidenced by commitment to reform, as well as the conduct and attendant personal criminal liability of relevant personnel.

15. There is every reason to suppose that enforcement of the Act will be reasonable and proportionate and will not place heavy handed constraint upon existing practices of corporate hospitality which are congruent and within sensible bounds.


16. On the question of policing the Act, The prospective absorption of the SFO into the new Economic Crime Agency and cuts in police resources under the Comprehensive Spending Review of public sector finances might be taken to suggest that non-compliance with the Act is at low risk of detection. That is likely to be a seriously mistaken view.

17. The relevant corporate processes will involve people who are individually at risk of personal liability, not only under the Act but under existing regulatory statutes, the Proceeds of Crime legislation being a prime example. Auditors and bankers for example are likely to feel constrained to file defensive suspicious activity reports. Such is the existing understanding of a functioning regulatory framework within the regulated sector that the Act is likely to be self-policing to a significant extent in the way described.

18. The stakes are undoubtedly high. UK companies convicted of corruption face the risk of being unable to bid for public sector contracts under the EU Public Procurement Directive.


19. Know Your Customer, or KYC, was the dominant regulatory principle within the regulated sector from the 1990's onwards. The Act takes KYC as a given and shifts emphasis onto the prevention of bribery and corruption. What we are seeing is the development of a new compliance framework which in particular will need to be sufficiently efficient to meet threats which may arise from the emerging markets or from existing markets with an established culture of corruption.

20. The length and breadth of the jurisdictional reach described earlier places all personnel of Jersey service providers at risk should they become involved in prohibited activity. It is plain therefore that businesses should put in place written procedures adequately designed to identify relevant risk and to counter the possibility of involvement in bribery transactions. It is in a high degree likely that these would characteristically take the form of processing payments between clients and third parties.' Know your third party' may become a relevant watch phrase. Payments, for example, to offshore companies for 'marketing services', 'commission-sharing' and 'introduction fees' are the sort of items which will require the closest scrutiny.

21. It is true that the handing of such payments might already have given rise to criminal liability under the Proceeds of Crime (Jersey) Law 1999 so that the Act is not entirely innovative in its effect in Jersey (see the Qatar v Al Thani and associated litigation which ran in the Royal Court between 1998 and 2002 for detail). The matter did not result in criminal prosecution and the difficulties attendant on such a prosecution therefore remained untested. The Act removes areas of uncertainty and provides prosecutors with a clearer road to the criminal court.


22. Through international instruments like the OECD convention and the U.N. convention against corruption, anticorruption efforts are being stepped up almost globally and there is little doubt that the trend will continue. It is these global aspects which give point to the demanding provisions of the Act. Shortly expressed, they are necessary to ensure that all companies, domestic and foreign, large and small, have equal access to the globalized markets.

23. The Act, moreover, has a humane purpose. That aspect is best seen in the words of the Acting US Assistant Attorney General in the aftermath of the Siemens case, mentioned earlier: 'For let there be no doubt that corruption is not a victimless offense. Corruption is not a gentlemen's agreement where no one gets hurt. People do get hurt. And the people who are hurt the worst are often residents of the poorest countries on the face of the earth, especially where it occurs in the context of government infrastructure projects, contracts in which crucial development decisions are made, in which a country will live by those decisions for good or for bad for years down the road, and where those decisions are made using precious and scarce national resources'.


24. MLROs already have well developed experience of the sort of due diligence which will be required under the Act both inward and outward looking. There is anecdotal evidence that a good number of firms are putting the MLRO in change of anti-corruption. However it is equally true that many MLROs face demands on their time and expertise which already take them close to the limit of their capacity. It is equally true that they are not necessarily best placed to craft and implement 'adequate procedures'. It is becoming apparent that larger financial institutions are assigning a designated individual to manage their anti-corruption responsibilities. This mirrors the position with sanctions compliance which can be regarded as developing into a discrete discipline.


25. It is plain that the relevant Jersey businesses should now be developing the appropriate compliance procedures or reviewing existing procedures with a view to update.

26. As a minimum there should be: a documented assessment of the risk which bribery and corruption may pose to the business; amendment or implementation of policies to prevent involvement by the business in bribery transactions at any stage of process; a functioning system of compliance monitoring.

27. Should suspicion arise that the business has already been involved in a dubious transaction the need for early, specialised legal advice cannot be over emphasised.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions