India: Supreme Court Rules On The Issue Of Composite Reference To Arbitration Under Multiple Agreements

Last Updated: 31 October 2017
Article by Rajat Jariwal, Sahil Narang and Aakash Bajaj

Most Read Contributor in India, August 2019

On 10 October 2017, the Hon'ble Supreme Court (Supreme Court / Court) pronounced a judgment in the case of M/s Duro Felgueria SA v M/s Gangavaram Port Limited1 wherein the issue of composite reference to arbitration under multiple agreements between three parties was decided.

Factual background

This case involved three parties, namely: (1) Gangavaram Port Limited (GPL), an Indian company; (2) Duro Felguera Plantas Industrials SA (DFPI), a Spanish company; and (3) Felguera Gruas India Private Limited (FGI), an Indian company.

GPL had developed a greenfield, ultra-modern, all-weather sea-port and intended to expand its facilities in the port with respect to bulk materials handling system. For this purpose, GPL invited a tender and in response to the said tender, DFPI along with FGI submitted a Single Bid/ Tender - Original Package No 4 dated 15 November 2011.

DFPI and FGI were selected as the contractors for the works and after discussion between the parties, the Original Package No 4 was divided into five different and separate packages, namely (i) New Package No 4, (ii) Package No 6, (iii) Package No 7, (iv) Package No 8 and (v) Package No 9. New Package No 4 was awarded to DFPI whereas Package Nos 6 to 9 were awarded to FGI. Separate letters of award were issued for the five different Packages.

Five different contracts were entered into on 10 May 2012 for the five separate Packages with different parties. The contract with reference to New Package No 4 was entered into with DFPI and the contracts in relation to Package Nos 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 were entered into with FGI. Each one of the contract/agreement for work under the split up Packages contained an arbitration clause namely, sub-clause 20.6 and the proceedings were governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act). DFPI also executed a corporate guarantee dated 17 March 2012 (Guarantee) in favor of GPL guaranteeing due performance of all the works awarded to DFPI and FGI. The Guarantee had its own separate arbitration clause (Clause 8).

On 11 August 2012, DFPI and FGI executed a Tripartite Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with GPL to carry out the works as per the priority of the documents listed therein. The MOU did not contain any specific arbitration clause.

Disputes arose between the parties and DFPI issued a notice invoking arbitration on 5 April 2016 for the New Package No 4 contract. FGI also issued four arbitration notices dated 7 April 2016 for Package Nos 6 to 9 contracts. Both DFPI and FGI nominated Justice D R Deshmukh as their nominee arbitrator in each of the respective five contracts.

GPL issued a comprehensive arbitration notice on 13 April 2016 under sub-section 20.6 of the Original Package No 4 – Tender Document which, as per GPL, was incorporated in the MOU by reference and all the other five contracts namely Package No 4, Package Nos 6 to 9 and the Guarantee.

Main contentions of GPL

  1. The MOU referred to all the agreements and it had subsumed all the separate agreements and therefore there could only be one agreement in relation to which one particular arbitral tribunal should be appointed to resolve the disputes of international commercial arbitration.
  2. The MOU makes a reference to the Original Package No 4 – Tender Document which contains an arbitration clause and hence the arbitration clause is incorporated into the MOU by reference.
  3. The Original Package No 4 – Tender Document was split up into five separate contracts only based on a request made by DFPI for the convenience of the contractors and all the works are interconnected and interlinked.
  4. The appointment of a single arbitral tribunal, under the MOU, would avoid conflicting awards between the parties, huge wastage of time, resources and expenses and would be consistent with law and public policy.

Main contentions of DFPI and FGI

  1. The parties by a conscious decision and agreement superseded the Original Package No 4 – Tender Document and five new package contracts with different works were entered and executed.
  2. The MOU came into existence long after the contracts and it does not contain any arbitration clause. The MOU only enlists the priority of the documents to be considered for carrying out the works and cannot override the terms of the separate contracts.
  3. The Guarantee has its own separate and distinct arbitration clause and the same has no connection with the arbitration clauses of the five different contracts.
  4. There cannot be a composite reference for five different contracts which are separate in their contents and the subject matter. Therefore, there has to be multiple arbitral tribunals for different contracts, however, the composition of these tribunals can be the same.

Decision of the Court

Powers of the Court under Section 11(6A) of the Act

The Court noticed that this was one of the first cases before it on the issue of interpretation of Section 11(6A) of the Act after the amendments to the Act in 2015. Therefore, the Court deemed it appropriate to outline the scope and extent of power of the High Court and the Supreme Court under Sections 11(6) and 11(6A) of the Act.

The Court while considering the pre-amendment judgments2  held that even though the scope and power of the High Court and Supreme Court under Section 11(6) of the Act was considerably wide but after the amendment all that the Court needs to see is whether the arbitration agreement exists and nothing more and nothing less. The Court also held that the amended provisions of Section 11(7) of the Act provides that the order passed under Section 11(6) shall not be appealable and thus finality is attached to the order passed under this Section.

Composite reference of multiple agreements

The Court held that in this case there are six arbitral agreements i.e. five package contracts for works and one under the Guarantee. The Court also held that from the records all that had to be seen was that there were separate letters of award, separate contracts, separate subject matters and separate and distinct works. The Court held that considering these circumstances and the restrictive scope of interference under Section 11 of the Act, there had to be separate arbitral tribunals for the disputes pertaining to each agreement, for the following reasons:

  1. After the Original Package No. 4 was split up into five separate agreements, the parties could not revert to the terms of the Original Package No. 4 nor could they merge into one.
  2. Mere reference of the Original Package No. 4 – Tender Document in the MOU could not lead to an inference of an arbitration clause being incorporated in it. The MOU, in this case, was meant to lay down the priority of documents only to clarify the priority in execution of the work.
  3. Merely because DFPI gave a corporate guarantee undertaking to compensate GPL for both DFPI and FGI, the same cannot supersede the five split up contracts.
  4. The Court while distinguishing the judgment of the Supreme Court in Chloro Controls India Private Limited v Severn Trent Water Purification Inc & Ors (Chloro Controls case)3 held that the said judgment and the ratio regarding the doctrine of 'composite reference' was not applicable to the instant case. The Court considered that the arbitration clause in the Chloro Controls case included the wordings "under and in connection with" in the principal agreement, which was very wide. However, in this case all the contracts had separate arbitration clauses and they did not depend upon the terms and conditions of the parent agreement (i.e. the MOU).
  5. The Court also considered that if the request of GPL for having a composite international commercial arbitration is accepted, then FGI (the Indian party) may lose the opportunity of challenging the award under Section 34(2A) of the Act.

However, since the issues arising between the parties were interrelated, the Court appointed the same arbitral tribunal for resolving each of the disputes under two international commercial arbitrations involving DFPI and four domestic arbitrations involving FGI.


The decision assumes relevance as the Court has propounded its views on the (i) scope of examination by the relevant court under Section 11 of the Act for appointment of an arbitrator; (ii) the law relating to incorporation of an arbitration clause in a document by reference; and (iii) a composite reference under multiple agreements. The Supreme Court has narrowed the scope of its power in relation to the appointment of an arbitrator. The decision of the Supreme Court may be argued by some to be a hyper-technical view which may defeat other analogous purposes of arbitration i.e. increasing efficacy, efficiency and avoiding wastage of time, resource and money.


[1] Arbitration Petition No 30 of 2016 with Arbitration Petition No 31 of 2016 & TC (C)Nos 25/2017, 26/2017 and 28/2017

[2] Konkan Railway Corporation Limited and Ors. v Mehul Construction Company [(2000) 7 SCC 201]

   Konkan Railway Corporation Limited and Anr v Rani Construction Private Limited [(2002) 2 SCC 388]

   SBP and Co v Patel Engineering Limited and Anr, [(2005) 8 SCC 618]

   National Insurance Company Limited v Boghara Polyfab Private Limited [(2009) 1 SCC 267]

[3] 2013(1) SCC 641

The content of this document do not necessarily reflect the views/position of Khaitan & Co but remain solely those of the author(s). For any further queries or follow up please contact Khaitan & Co at

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions