India: Supreme Court On Admissibility Of Electronic Records As Secondary Evidence

Last Updated: 28 July 2017
Article by Anuj Berry, Malak Bhatt and Sonali Malik

A two judge bench of the Supreme Court, comprising of Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Justice SA Bobde, on 18.7.2017 in the case of Sonu v State of Haryana, (Criminal Appeal No. 1416/2013, 1653/2014, 1652/2014), upheld the conviction of the accused, Sonu, for the offence of Kidnapping and Murdering under the IPC, thereby dismissing his criminal appeal. One of main grounds taken by the accused during the appeal was that the CDRs1 of the mobile phone of the accused, which was a crucial part of the evidence, for proving the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt and being relied upon by the prosecution, should be eschewed/disregarded from consideration as they were inadmissible, for non-compliance with the requirements under Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ("Evidence Act") as admittedly they were not certified in accordance with sub-section (4) of section 65-B. The accused placed strong reliance on the three judge bench decision of the Supreme Court in Anvar P.V. v P.K. Basheer, (2014 10 SCC 473) by which the Supreme Court held in unequivocal terms that an electronic record by way of secondary evidence shall not be admissible as evidence unless the requirements of Section 65-B are satisfied.

Section 65-B of the Evidence Act and subsequent principle laid in Anvar

In 2002, the Evidence Act underwent major changes by introduction of the Information Technology Act, 2000 ("IT" Act). Amendments were made in the Evidence Act, to make provisions for admitting evidence by way of electronic records. Explanation to Section 3 was added to incorporate all electronic records in the definition of 'Documentary Evidence' under the Evidence Act. Further, Section 65-A and Section 65-B were introduced with the amendments, as special provisions pertaining to the admissibility of electronic evidence. Section 63 and Section 65 deal with the manner and conditions for relying on secondary evidence.

Before the judgement in Anvar (supra), the law laid down in State of NCT Delhi v Navjyot Singh (2005) 11 SCC 600 was being followed,  which held that irrespective of the compliance with requirements of Section 65-B, there is no bar in adducing secondary evidence even for  electronic records as per Sections 63 and Section 65. The court further held that even if a certificate containing the details as stipulated by sub-section (4) of Section 65-B is not filed, it does not render the evidence inadmissible as secondary evidence under Section 63 and Section 65 can still be adduced.

However, the Supreme Court in Anwar (supra) overruled the above position. The Court held that for any electronic evidence to be admissible in its secondary form, it is necessary to meet the mandatory requirements of Section 65-B, which includes giving a certificate as per terms of Section 65-B (4), at the time of proving the record and not anytime later, failing which the electronic record will be considered inadmissible.

Supreme Court's decision in Sonu and the dilemma raised on the law laid down in Anvar

Despite the decision in Anwar, being rendered by a 3 judge bench, a division bench of the Supreme Court in this  case rejected the reliance placed on Anvar by the accused, and thereby denied him an opportunity to raise an objection with regard to inadmissibility of electronic evidence for the want of certification as per section 65-B.

The Court after placing reliance on a few decisions of the Supreme Court, divided the objection with regard to admissibility of a document into two categories- a) The first objection is when that the document is per se inadmissible. b) The second is when the objection is directed not on the admissibility of document in evidence, but towards the method or mode of proof of evidence. It was held that the objection with regard to mode or method of proof has to be raised at the time of marking the document as exhibit, and not later. Whereas, the issue of admissibility of a document which is inherently inadmissible, for instance, statements under Section 161 Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (CrPC,) can be taken up at an appellate stage as well, as such an issue strikes at the foundation of the document. The mode or method of proof is procedural in nature, and if such objection is not taken at trial, it cannot taken at the appellate stage.

In laying down the above principle, the court relied on the decision in RVE Venkatachala Gounder, (2003) 8 SCC 752, that the crucial test for the purpose of determining when an omission to object becomes fatal is, whether the objection if taken at the appropriate stage, would have enabled the party tendering the evidence to cure the defect and render a regular mode of proof.

Applying the above principle, the Supreme Court in Sonu held that the defect of relying on the CDRs without the appropriate certificate, is a defect in the mode or method of proof, as CDRs are not per se inadmissible. Hence, it held that such an objection cannot be allowed to be raised at the appellate stage. This is because, had such an objection been taken at the trial stage, the court could have given an opportunity to the prosecution to rectify the defect, which will be denied at this stage if the case of the accused is accepted. 

The Conundrum Caused by Sonu v State of Haryana

While a larger bench of the Supreme Court, clearly and unequivocally, stated in 2014, that any electronic evidence in secondary form will be inadmissible, if filed without meeting the requirements of Section 65 B(4), the two judge bench in Sonu, has expressed doubts over this principle

The Court in the last part of this judgement noted that the court in Anvar has not applied the principle of prospective ruling. While noting this, the Court expressed concerns over the law laid in Anvar being applied retrospectively on one hand, and on the other hand, it refrained from answering whether the judgement in Anvar could be made prospective in nature and has left this question open.

In such a situation, the Supreme Court's touching upon the issue of prospective nature of the judgment in Anvar and leaving the issue open at the end has caused great dilemma and opened a pandora's box. In this regard and owing to the confusion created, it remains to be seen if the Supreme Court's decisions will be used to reopen or challenge admissibility of evidence in pending trials where the requirements under Section 65B were not complied with.

Since the Court in the instant case has held the requirements of Section 65B to be the ones relating to mode/method of proof (despite Anvar holding that non-compliance with 65B strikes at the very admissibility of the evidence), it will be worthwhile to see the impact of this judgement on the ongoing trials and proceedings.


1 Call Detail Record (CDR) is a file containing information such as the identities of sources (points of origin), the identities of destinations (endpoints), the duration of each call etc.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions