India: Tata Shareholders' Suit: Bombay High Court Revokes Leave To Proceed In A Representative Capacity

Last Updated: 13 July 2017
Article by Nitesh Jain and Juhi Mathur

The Bombay High Court on 10 July 2017 revoked its earlier leave granted under Order I Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Code) for the suit tilted Pramod Premchand Shah & Ors. vs. Ratan Tata & Ors. to proceed in a representative capacity.

Six shareholders of the seven listed Tata companies (Plaintiffs) have filed the suit against Tata Sons Limited, the directors of Tata Sons, certain trustees of the Sir Ratan Tata Trust and Sir Dorabji Tata Trust, and seven listed Tata companies in which Tata Sons has investments. In the suit the Plaintiffs have claimed inter alia damages in the sum of INR 41,832 crores for alleged loss caused to the 'all non-promoter shareholders' of these seven listed defendant companies owing to, inter alia, the fall in share price of those seven defendant companies as a result of the alleged illegal removal of Mr Cyrus P. Mistry as the Executive Chairman of Tata Sons by the resolution dated 24 October 2016 of the Board of Directors of Tata Sons.

By an ex-parte order dated 9 December 2017, the Bombay High Court had granted leave under Order I Rule 8 of the Code enabling the Plaintiffs to sue Tata Sons, the directors of Tata Sons and certain trustees of the Sir Ratan Tata Trust and Sir Dorabji Tata Trust and the seven listed Tata Companies on behalf of, or for the benefit, of numerous persons having the same interest in the suit. On 16 December 2016, notice of the leave was published in the Times of India and the Economic Times. Following the publication, applications were filed by a very few individual shareholders of one or more of the seven companies seeking to be impleaded in the suit.

Legal Issue Involved

Tata Sons sought to revoke the leave on the ground that the Plaintiffs, between them, neither have a common interest in the suit, nor have any interest in common with other individual non-promoter shareholders of the seven defendant Tata companies. It was Tata Sons' argument that the Plaintiffs are not shareholders of each of the seven companies arraigned as party defendants; that they are shareholders of one or more of the seven companies, each of whom have distinct Articles of Association, and a separate and independent board of directors.

The court was tasked with interpreting Order I Rule 8 of the Code which permits one or more persons to sue (or defend) with leave of the court on behalf of, or for the benefit of, numerous other persons provided that such others have "the same interest in one suit".

Decision of the Bombay High Court

The court held that 'the interest in the suit' is the prejudice or accrual of liability arising therefrom, and not the proprietary rights of the shareholders per se or the interest in protecting the share value. The court's decision follows the principle expounded by The House of Lords in the celebrated case of The Duke of Bedford vs. Ellis & Ors. considering Order XVI,  Rule 9 to the Judiciary Act, 1873 (which is in pari materia with  Order I Rule 8 of the Code)

According to the Bombay High Court, a suit under Order I Rule 8 of the Code, if filed or defended for others, then such others must form a class having a common interest in (i) the right or the liability alleged in the suit; (ii) the grievance or injury complained of; and (iii) in the relief sought (comprising of the three components of a suit). The court considered whether, even assuming there were seven different suits in respect of seven individual companies, shareholders of each company could be said to have community of interest for claiming relief in respect of fall in share prices of that particular company with the individual plaintiff complaining of such fall as such shareholders.

The court reasoned that a drop in share prices may affect different shareholders differently, that it was always possible that other non-promoters shareholders (who do not support the Plaintiffs) could hold a view that the drop in share prices could be as a result of the resistance offered by Mr. Cyrus Mistry and his non-promoter group. The court also considered that the foundational grievance pertaining to the ouster of Mr. Cyrus Mistry, may also find support amongst other non-promoter shareholders who do not want the reinstatement of Mr. Cyrus Mistry, who oppose the suit and would be forced to join the suit and defend it, when they had no intention or obligation to do so.       

During the arguments it was put forth on behalf of the Plaintiffs that the expressions 'on behalf of' and 'for the benefit of' in Clause (a) of sub-rule 1 of Rule 8 of the Code should be used as disjunctives, either may be satisfied and not both. Interpreting Clause (a) of sub-rule 1 of Rule 8 of the Code, the court held that the expressions 'on behalf of' and 'for the benefit of' cannot be read mutually exclusively, and in the facts of the case, the Plaintiffs cannot sue on behalf of others who resist Mr. Cyrus Mistry's reinstatement. Principally holding that one cannot sue on behalf of another, when such suit is to his detriment or against his interest. 

In its Judgment, the Bombay High Court has held that the Pramod Shah Suit was not a representative suit for in the circumstances of the case, the Plaintiffs cannot claim to represent such non-promoter shareholders who oppose the suit, and any decree passed would not be for the benefit of every person represented in the suit. 

As for certain non-promoter shareholders who sought to be impleaded, the court held that the same was not determinative of the issue and was merely a coincidence.

Key Take-away from the Decision

As a result of the suit losing its representative character, the Plaintiffs no longer represent 'all the non-promoter shareholders' and cannot seek damages in the quantum of INR 41,832 crores, which is on behalf of all the non-promoter shareholders. Going forward, the principles laid down by the High Court will provide a precedent to determine the test of "same interest" under Order I Rule 8 of the Code, more so in shareholder class action disputes.

On 11 July 2017, the Plaintiffs sought a stay of the Judgment to enable them to assail the same before the appellate forum, however, the Bombay High Court declined to grant a stay. While declining to grant stay, the court held that once the leave is revoked on merits, the suit cannot be allowed to continue as a representative suit and the Plaintiffs can continue the suit in their individual capacity to the extent the reliefs relate to their personal case.

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co., and the authors have successfully represented Tata Sons and its Directors in this suit before the Bombay High Court.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions