India: Tata-Docomo Settlement-Strong Signals

Last Updated: 2 June 2017
Article by Priti Suri


The Delhi High Court ("DHC") delivered an important judgment in NTT Docomo Inc. vs. Tata Sons Ltd.,1 in which it upheld an award delivered by an arbitral tribunal in London, directing Tata Sons Ltd. ("Tata") to pay NTT Docomo ("Docomo") INR 84.5 billion or about USD 1.34 billion2 as damages. The judgment is a significant one as it drives home the issue of an Indian company honouring its contractual obligations with a foreign company.

This newsletter summarizes the key points discussed in the judgment that could impact contracts between an Indian and a non-resident party.

1. Facts

In 2009, Docomo and Tata executed a Shareholders Agreement ("SHA") where the exit clauses entitled Docomo to exercise a put option if Tata failed to perform certain conditions. In that case it would be obligated to find buyers for Docomo's shares at a sale price which was (i) the fair value of the shares as of March 31, 2014; or (ii) 50% of the price at which Docomo purchased the shares, whichever was higher. In 2014, consistent with the SHA provisions, Docomo issued a sale notice requiring Tata to comply with the above terms. Tata failed to respond to the notice within the specified time period and, as a result, a dispute arose between the parties which was referred to arbitration.

In the arbitration proceedings, Tata placed on record RBI's letter dated February 20, 2015 wherein RBI refused Tata's request to acquire Docomo's shares at the agreed sale price, on the basis that the sale violated Regulation 9 of the Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of Security by a Person Resident Outside India) Regulations, 2000 ("FEMA 20"). FEMA 20 was amended several times subsequently. The amendment issued on May 23, 2014 specifically provided that in the event of a transfer of equity shares by a non-resident, valuation had to be done as per the international pricing methods and duly certified by a chartered accountant or a registered merchant banker. The amendment specifically stated that the non-resident investor is not guaranteed an assured exit price. According to Tata, this was not the case in the SHA which did provide a guaranteed return. In June 2016 after deliberating upon the issues raised by both parties, the tribunal delivered an award in favour of Docomo directing Tata to pay damages of USD 1.3 billion.

Consequently, Docomo filed a petition before DHC seeking enforcement and execution of the award. The DHC issued a notice to Tata seeking deposit of the awarded amount, which was done. On February 25, 2017 the parties settled the matter and recorded their consent terms before DHC. Accordingly, Tata agreed to pay the awarded amount with accrued interests, and further requested DHC to pass an order giving effect to the terms of consent.

Meanwhile, RBI filed an intervention application in the DHC proceedings on the grounds that the consent terms sought to be enforced were refused by RBI under FEMA 20 and its amendments, and its enforcement would violate the public policy of India. The DHC passed a final order wherein it dismissed the intervention petition and upheld the award passed by the tribunal.

2. Decision of the arbitral tribunal

It is necessary to examine the findings of the arbitral tribunal which gave a considered award on various issues identified by the parties, including the need for prior RBI approval as well as challenges in performance due to statutory constraints. The tribunal held that the exit clause contemplated two different methods of performance which meant the parties were aware of the limitations that could impede them from executing an option. Hence, an alternative was agreed. The obligation on Tata was to find a buyer for Docomo's sale shares on the stipulated price. Clearly, the intent would have been to avail an alternative which was possible, in fact and in law. The tribunal was of the firm view that "Docomo had an unqualified right to a method of performance that did not violate applicable law. Performance did not require special permission of RBI since certain methods of performance were covered by general permissions" Since Tata failed to perform, it breached the SHA thereby entitling Docomo to damages. Thus, the monetary award covered price for shares, accrued interest on that price and arbitral and legal costs.

3. DHC proceedings

As stated, the parties agreed to settle the matter and recorded their consent terms with the DHC. However, RBI had filed its intervention application prior to the parties reaching a consensus. DHC gave a fair chance to RBI to defend itself but raised a fundamental question about its locus standi since the RBI was not a party to the award. RBI contended that the effect of the award was to remit money overseas in foreign exchange, so its role cannot be negated. They further stipulated that the award provided that "FEMA regulations need not be looked into" and this was illegal and contrary to public policy of India. After hearing all the parties, the court concluded that:

  • there is no statutory provision which permits a third party to intervene in judicial proceedings where it was not involved in the first place (RBI was not a part of arbitration proceedings)
  • discussion of statutory powers and functions of a regulator in proceedings does not entitle that body to acquire locus standi to participate, without any corresponding legal provision
  • foreign awards can be refused only to parties to an arbitration agreement and proceedings and RBI was not a party in it either
  • if the legislature intended to include RBI in matters where the enforcement of an arbitral award would result in remitting money outside India, an express provision would have been clearly mentioned in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Act"). Since this was not the case, RBI was bound by the award.

RBI's second issue was regarding the effect of the contractual provision which, according to them, provided an "assured return" to a non-resident entity. Such guaranteed return was in express violation of FEMA 20 and the amendment of May 20, 2014 as discussed in section 1 above.

The DHC was of the view that the present SHA did not guarantee a "assured return" as the concept would apply when an overseas investor gets the principle amount along with a certain return. The court upheld the view of the Tribunal that the intent in the agreement was to protect Docomo from losing more than 50% of the investment due to a fall in market prices during the time of the actual sale of the shares. Such intent did not qualify as "assured return".

4. The Impact

The settlement of the dispute, the process involved in reaching a conclusive end, despite RBI's intervention, ought to send a strong signal to the business world. Firstly, it evidences that India is committed to preserving fair arbitral awards by speedily discussing challenges to enforcement. Lack of closure in such cross-border disputes has in the past, given a negative reputation to the Indian-businesses as well as judicial processes. Secondly, by upholding an award in favour of a foreign company, the DHC has definitely sent a positive signal to foreign investors that the judicial process is not pro-Indians or anti-foreign investors; rather, by application of sound legal principles and reasons, it will do what is correct per Indian law. Thirdly, DHC has also taken a correct, though unusual position vis. a vis. RBI's intervention application. Despite the fact that the country's top bank tried to prevent enforcement, DHC did not allow it to happen. By questioning the locus standi of the RBI and coming to a reasoned conclusion and rejecting its intervention, the message is clear i.e. (a) only a party to an arbitral agreement can challenge enforcement; and (b) judiciary is independent and will not be cowed under pressure, even if that comes from the nation's top bank. In effect, this judgement will have significant value, should other third parties try to stall enforcement of arbitral awards by attempting to implead themselves and resist execution. Fourthly, by withdrawing the challenge to enforcement, Tata demonstrated its good will coupled with the commitment to honor its contractual obligations. This again is a positive and a reassuring signal to foreign investors viz., Indian conglomerates can and do abide by signed contracts. Importantly, Tata did not burn bridges with Docomo thereby paving the way for possible future ventures as well. Hopefully, the amicable parting may also solidify Tata's endeavours to play an important role in the Indian telecom industry, either directly or maybe with another partner.


The judgement ought to boost investors' confidence in the Indian market. Of course, it is possible RBI may appeal to a higher court and, if that happens, final resolution may be delayed. In the meanwhile, by upholding the sanctity of a foreign arbitral award, the DHC has given a landmark judgement through which the message is loud and clear that the Indian judicial works effectively. Finally, in order to curtail further litigations by other companies, it may be prudent for RBI to establish a clear framework on the issue of shareholders' returns which should be fair and not detrimental for foreign companies investing in India.


1 MANU/DE/1164/2017 passed on April 24, 2017

2 1 USD = about INR 64

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions