India: CCI's Take On The Indian E-Commerce Market: Protect Competition, Not Competitors

Last Updated: 26 May 2015
Article by Anubhuti Mishra


With the recent surge in internet users given the improved access to smart phones, and the convenience of the world wide web at our fingertips, the e-commerce market in India is witnessing an unprecedented growth spurt. One of the most promising sectors of the Indian market, the annual revenue of the e-commerce sector is projected to cross USD 16 billion by the end of 2015.1 The Indian e-commerce market includes travel, financial services, real estate and other classifieds, online retail and various other services. Although online retail occupies less than 1% share of the overall retail market in India,2 it is growing rapidly. The success of the online retail start-ups is expected to achieve annual revenue of USD 7 billion in 2016 with a compound annual growth rate of over 60%.3 With such exponential projected growth rate and investments pooling into online retail start-ups, various market regulators have frowned upon the lack of regulations in the e-commerce sector. The lack of clarity regarding the levy of service tax and value added tax on online retail and the prohibition of foreign direct investment in e-commerce companies providing goods and services directly to consumers has added to these concerns. Given these circumstances, it is not surprising that the Competition Commission of India ("CCI") has recently looked into allegations of unfair trade practices by some major companies operating in this sector, viz., Flipkart, SnapDeal, Jabong, Myntra and Amazon.4

This newsletter examines the impact of the CCI's order on the Indian e-commerce market, especially the CCI's interpretation of the relevant market and the effect of online retail business models on price and non-price competition.

1. Facts

The investigation was started as a result of information filed by Mr. Mohit Manglani (the "Informant") against four major online retail players of the Indian e-commerce industry, namely, Flipkart, Jasper Infotech, Xerion Retail, Amazon and Vector E-commerce (collectively, the "Opposite Parties"). The Informant alleged that the Opposite Parties have been indulging in anti-competitive practices in violation of the Competition Act, 2002 (the "Act"), by means of exclusive supply and distribution agreements with manufacturers/sellers of goods and services.5 The Informant also stipulated that the Opposite Parties had executed exclusive agreements for sale of certain products to the exclusion of other e-portals or physical channels. For instance, he cited writer Chetan Bhagat's latest novel which was launched exclusively on Flipkart. This, according to the Informant, enables the Opposite Parties to control the supply of the goods exclusively sold on their portals, thereby, creating an impression of scarcity, which often leads to foreclosure of the market for the traders operating in the physical market. This, in turn, causes an appreciable adverse effect on competition ("AAEC"). The Informant also alleged that due to such exclusive arrangements, the Opposite Parties had acquired a product specific monopoly, i.e., each of the Opposite Parties had a 100% dominance in the market for those goods that were exclusively sold on their portals. According to the Informant, this enabled them to manipulate prices and impose other terms and conditions detrimental to the interest of the consumers.

Similar allegations had been leveled against individual online retail companies by their brick and mortar counterparts, in complaints received by the CCI, previously. Their main grievance was that the practices adopted by these companies were driving these proprietors out of business. To address the prevailing concerns in the market, the CCI decided to take into account a similar complaint filed against the Opposite Parties, by the All Delhi Computer Traders Association ("ADCTA"), forwarded to it by the Director General in December 2014. The ADCTA had alleged that the Opposite Parties were engaged in predatory pricing, by purchasing goods from distributors or dealers on 21-30 days' credit and subsequently selling these products at prices lower than their purchase prices, to the detriment of such distributors and dealers. The ADCTA had also alleged that the Opposite Parties were abusing their dominant position in the market to impose quantity and resale restrictions, which affected the distributors and dealers operating in the physical market. The CCI heard the ADCTA, alongside the Informant and the Opposite Parties, to arrive at its prima facie opinion in this case.

2. Stand taken by the Opposite Parties

The Opposite Parties contended that the relevant market in question cannot be construed as product specific for each exclusive dealing agreement, per se, since the relevant market for a product would also include its close substitutes. Therefore, products which were able to exercise a price constraint on such products would also form part of the relevant product market. For instance, the relevant product market for a book could be delineated on the basis of language, genre, etc. but could not be confined to each book which was marketed through a particular portal. They also contended that the e-portals operate on a marketplace model, wherein the e-portal is not the owner of the goods sold, but simply a distribution channel. Therefore, the online and offline (or physical) retail markets are merely subsets of the organized retail market in India, and do not constitute separate relevant markets. The Opposite Parties further contended that India's organized retail market itself accounts for merely 8% of the Indian retail market, and online retail being a subset of the organized retail market, its market share is not significant enough to constitute a dominant position.

With regard to their exclusive arrangements with manufacturers and suppliers, the Opposite Parties alleged that such vertical agreements6 were not presumed to have AAEC. The Act required these vertical agreements to be evaluated on the touchstone of various factors laid down under Section 19(3), so as to determine whether they deter, or in fact, improve competition. Therefore, the Opposite Parties contended that the exclusivity of their alleged vertical agreements, was limited to the exclusion of other online portals, and did not prohibit the manufacturer/supplier to sell their product on their own websites or in the physical market. They further argued that given the wide range of available substitutes and the existing competition in the retail market as well as amongst the e-portals themselves, no single manufacturer was able to exercise enough market power to affect competition in the relevant market.

3. CCI's Order

The CCI agreed with the Opposite Parties in determining that the relevant market could not be product specific as it includes all substitutes of a product. Therefore, it could not be said that the Opposite Parties were 100% dominant in the market for those products which were exclusively marketed by them. The CCI went on to state that irrespective of whether the online retail market is considered to be a separate relevant product market or a subset of the retail market, none of the Opposite Parties could be said to be individually dominant, given the multitude of e-portals in the market offering similar facilities. Based on this reasoning, the CCI refused to comment further on allegations of abuse of the alleged dominance of the Opposite Parties.

Evaluating the impugned exclusive agreements on the touchstone of the factors laid down under Section 19(3) of the Act,7 the CCI concluded that any exclusive arrangement between a manufacturer and an e-portal does not seem to create any entry barriers in the market. Moreover, the availability of substitutable products creates sufficient competitive constraints so as to deter any scope of monopoly or dominance. The CCI, in fact, noted that new e-portals are entering into the market which rather indicates a growth in competition. It further observed that as online distribution channels, the Opposite Parties help the consumers make a more informed decision by comparing prices and products. Based on these observations, the CCI concluded that the alleged exclusive arrangements do not cause any AAEC in the relevant market.

The key findings of the CCI with regard to the effect that the Opposite Parties have on competition in the retail market can be summarized as follows:

(i) The relevant market for a product marketed through an e-portal is not product specific, but includes all its substitutes which can exercise a restraint on the pricing of such product.

(ii) The exclusive marketing arrangements between e-portals and manufacturers/suppliers do not create any entry barriers in the market, as the manufacturers/suppliers are free to sell their products on their own websites as well as the physical market.

(iii) The availability of a large number of substitutable products, coupled with the multitude of companies operating e-portal services in the market, is enough to prevent the dominance of any single entity in this sector.

(iv) E-portals, in fact, improve price transparency, allowing consumers to make a more informed decision, and thereby enhance competition.

4. Impact of the Order

The CCI had earlier, on another occasion, rejected the segregation of online and offline retail markets, holding that "these two markets are different channels of distribution of the same product and are not two different relevant markets."8 However, in the same order, the CCI had also acknowledged that online and offline markets differ primarily in terms of discounts and the shopping experience they offer to their consumers. Hence, there appears to be a high degree of substitutability, inter se, within the two distribution channels from a consumer's point of view. This enabled the traders dealing in the physical market, to allege that the unfair trade practices by their online counterparts, was driving them out of the market. However, this order has not only clarified the position regarding what would constitute the relevant market for the Indian e-commerce sector, but also acknowledged that the advent of online retail has, in fact, enhanced competition in the market.

The CCI has observed that online distribution channels provide consumers with an opportunity to compare prices as well as the pros and cons of a product much more easily than their brick and mortar counterparts. This implies that price competition9 as well as inter brand competition10 is intensified, both within the online sub-segment of retail as well as between online and offline retail markets. The CCI order has also acknowledged that while the alleged exclusive dealing arrangements between e-portals and manufacturers/suppliers only exclude other e-portals, they do not prohibit such manufacturer/supplier from selling the said product on their own websites. Therefore, although they may have some impact on the intra brand competition11 across both the distribution channels; however, within the online distribution channel, their impact on intra brand competition appears to be negligible.


With the accelerated growth of the Indian e-commerce market, various market regulators have been keeping a close eye on the operational dynamics of the entities operating in the e-commerce market. Moreover, the recurring grievances of the brick and mortar shops against their online counterparts in the retail market, implores the Indian competition authorities to look into the competition repercussions of such business practices. In such a scenario, the CCI's effort to put to rest certain basic questions pertaining to the commercial practices of such online retail companies is laudable. By passing this order the CCI has reaffirmed the fact that the objective of the Act is to protect "competition" and not the "competitors".


1 Fast and Furious: The beginning of multi-year explosive growth, Thematic, November 2014, accessible at (last accessed on 11th May, 2015)

2 Evolution of e-commerce in India: Creating the Bricks Behind the Clicks, August 2014, Price Waterhouse Coopers, accessible at, (last accessed on 11th May, 2015)

3 Supra note 1

4 In Re: Mohit Manglani v. M/s Flipkart India Private Limited and Others, Case No. 80 of 2014, decided on 23rd April, 2015

5 Exclusive supply agreements are considered to be anti-competitive under Section 3(4)(b) of the Act, and exclusive distribution agreements are considered to be anti-competitive under Section 3(4)(c) of the Act, if they cause any appreciable adverse effect on competition

6 Vertical agreements refer to arrangements between entities operating at different levels in the production and distribution chain, e.g., an agreement between a manufacturer and a distributor

7 The factors that were considered by the CCI in this case, include creation of entry barriers in the market, elimination of existing competitors, foreclosure of competition, accrual of benefits to consumers, improvements in production or distribution chain and promotion of technical, scientific and economic developme

8 Ashish Ahuja v. SnapDeal and Another, Case No. 17 of 2014, at paragraph 16, decided on 19th May, 2014

9 Price competition refers to the condition of a free market economy where all the competitors sell the same product, the demand for which is driven by the prices charged by each seller for that product

10 Inter-brand competition refers to the competition between two brands or manufacturers producing similar or perfectly substitutable goods

11 Intra-brand competition refers to the competition between two retailers or distributors dealing in goods of the same brand

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
S.S. Rana & Co. Advocates
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
S.S. Rana & Co. Advocates
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions