ARTICLE
3 November 2017

Further Delays To UPC Timetable

D
Dehns

Contributor

Dehns logo

Founded in 1920, Dehns is one of Europe’s largest full service intellectual property firms, with offices in London, Munich, Oslo, Oxford, Bristol, Brighton, Manchester and Birmingham.

In addition to obtaining patent, trade mark and design protection around the world, our services also extend to IP management consulting and dispute resolution. Dehns attorneys have expertise in a wide range of technologies across the engineering, chemistry and biotechnology sectors.

Our clients include private inventors, universities and research institutions, start-ups and SMEs as well as large multinational corporations. We are firmly focussed on delivering clear advice and valuable results at a competitive cost.

Dehns’ straightforward, business-oriented approach combined with technical excellence has made us leaders in our field and we are proud of our top tier rankings.

Germany's ratification of the Unified Patent Court Agreement has been delayed further after the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, or BVerfG) extended the deadline...
Germany Intellectual Property

Germany's ratification of the Unified Patent Court Agreement has been delayed further after the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, or BVerfG) extended the deadline for submissions from third parties in relation to the constitutional complaint which was filed earlier this year. The UPC Agreement and Unitary Patent system cannot come into force until Germany ratifies the agreement and therefore the system is "on hold" until and unless the BVerfG rules that the Agreement is compliant with the German Constitution.

A total of 27 different organisations, including bodies such as the European Patent Lawyers' Association and the German Bar Association, are reported to have been invited to comment on the complaint. Originally the BVerfG set a 31 October deadline for comments, but this has now been extended to 31 December at the request of at least some of these parties.

After expiry of the deadline, the BVerfG will first of all decide whether the complaint is admissible. If the complaint is deemed admissible, a decision on the merits will follow. No firm timetable is known yet, but a decision on admissibility is expected in early 2018. If the case is admitted, a decision on the merits is unlikely before the second half of 2018 at the earliest. Given that some of the grounds of complaint include an allegation that the Agreement is contrary to European law, a referral to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling on points of European law cannot be ruled out. If this takes place, a delay until 2019 or even 2020 for the final decision might be expected.

The German Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) has extended the comment period on the credibility of a challenge to the Unified Patent Court (UPC).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More