Mondaq Canada: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration > Class Actions
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
In the recent decision of Justice Perell in Karasik v. Yahoo Inc., a motion by the representative plaintiffs for production of Yahoo's Canadian user database was dismissed
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
In Lillydale Cooperative Limited v. Meyn Canada Inc., the Court of Appeal for Ontario explained that the running of the 2-year period for a defendant to issue a third party ...
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
On September 20, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada released its highly-anticipated decision in Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey, addressing how Canadian courts should approach the certification of competition (antitrust) class actions.
Goodmans LLP
In an expansion of section 36 of the Competition Act, an eight member majority of the Supreme Court has ruled that "umbrella purchasers" can be class members in price-fixing class actions.
Goodmans LLP
This week, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) began its regular Fall sittings.
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
The recent decision of Justice Fothergill of the Federal Court in Rooke v Canada (Health) confirms that self-represented individuals cannot act in a representative capacity in class actions.
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
In a recent class action, a comma in a pension plan was alleged to have generated a dispute of more than $100 million.
Thomson Rogers
In spite of having this knowledge, the defendants have failed to warn Canadian patients adequately or at all about these risks and have still not recalled the Allergan Implants in Canada.
McMillan LLP
These appeals raise a fundamental question: are courts at a stage where the balance struck by Parliament of Canada's competition law
Aird & Berlis LLP
As we discussed in a prior article, climate change litigation has come to Canada.
Torys LLP
On September 20, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its long-awaited decision in an important competition class action. Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey (Godfrey)
Gowling WLG
Joint Defence Agreements ("JDAs") memorialize the agreement of defendants to exchange confidential and/or privileged information without waiving privilege over that inform...
Rogers Partners LLP
One of these noted essential provisions is that the plaintiffs continue their action, but limit their claim to the non-settling defendants several liability.
Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
This is not to say that umbrella purchasers' actions will not be complex or otherwise difficult to pursue.
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg
The Supreme Court of Canada has released its long-awaited decision in two companion appeals that have significant implications for class actions alleging conduct that contravenes the criminal provisions found in Part VI of the Competition Act.
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
On September 20, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) clarified several procedural questions regarding class-action certification in the case of Pioneer v. Godfrey.
Stikeman Elliott LLP
The Supreme Court of Canada extends the right to sue under section 36 of the Competition Act to umbrella purchasers who bought products from manufacturers not alleged to have been involved in any price fixing conspiracy.
Stikeman Elliott LLP
La Cour suprême du Canada étend le droit d'intenter une poursuite en vertu de l'article 36 de la Loi sur la concurrence aux acheteurs sous parapluie qui ont acheté des produits de fabricants qui
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Today, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a landmark competition class action decision in Toshiba Corporation, et al v Neil Godfrey and Pioneer Corporation, et al v Neil Godfrey.
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released the highly-anticipated decision in Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey, addressing a number of issues
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Topics covered included another decision in the ongoing Residential School Settlement saga (procedural fairness), family law (unequal division of property and striking pleadings for failure to comply with disclosure order)
Rogers Partners LLP
One of these noted essential provisions is that the plaintiffs continue their action, but limit their claim to the non-settling defendants several liability.
Cox & Palmer
2018 saw a number of developments in employment and labour law.
Aird & Berlis LLP
As we discussed in a prior article, climate change litigation has come to Canada.
Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
This is not to say that umbrella purchasers' actions will not be complex or otherwise difficult to pursue.
Theall Group LLP
The Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Pioneer Corporation v Godfrey, 2019 SCC 42, was a victory for the plaintiff, but it may prove advantageous for class action defendants in other cases.
Torys LLP
On September 20, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its long-awaited decision in an important competition class action. Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey (Godfrey)
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Today, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a landmark competition class action decision in Toshiba Corporation, et al v Neil Godfrey and Pioneer Corporation, et al v Neil Godfrey.
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg
The Supreme Court of Canada has released its long-awaited decision in two companion appeals that have significant implications for class actions alleging conduct that contravenes the criminal provisions found in Part VI of the Competition Act.
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Over the last several years, Canada has seen an increase in the number of class actions filed. Securities, mass torts, product liability and employment continue to be a frequent subject of class action litigation.
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with