Mondaq USA: Tax > Sales Taxes: VAT, GST
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In the past decade or so, the competition for executive talent in the tax-exempt sector of the United States economy has increased.
Reed Smith
The House of Representatives has voted 283 – 132 to approve legislation (HR 184) that would permanently repeal the Affordable Care Act's 2.3% excise tax on the sale of certain medical devices.
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Many states and localities are concerned that the proliferation of streaming services is shrinking tax revenues previously received from sales of traditional forms of entertainment.
Reed Smith
California briefly posted online a draft notice containing new use tax collection rules for retailers, indicating that it may imminently adopt use tax nexus thresholds similar to South Dakota's.
Bowditch & Dewey
On June 21, the U.S. Supreme Court upended the online retail industry, giving states the power to force online retailers to collect sales tax from sales to consumers.
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Welcome to the latest issue of New York Tax Insights.
Alliott Group (International)
The US Supreme Court ruling in the South Dakota versus Wayfair case might have opened a Pandora's Box of tax compliance problems internationally as states look to collect taxes they believe are owed to them. Californian CPA Daryl R. Petrick, Partner at Bowman & Company, LLP, explains the decision and the possible implications for retailers all over the globe.
Troutman Sanders LLP
On June 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair.
Dickinson Wright PLLC
In a sign of how far e-commerce has changed in just a little over two decades, on June 21, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned its 1992 decision of Quill v. North Dakota (504 U.S. 298).
Duane Morris LLP
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, passed by Congress and signed into law by President Trump at the end of 2017, overhauled the federal tax system.
McDermott Will & Emery
Last week, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) published a TTB Procedure governing the transfer in bond of beer between breweries of different ownership.
Morrison & Foerster LLP
The U.S. Supreme Court decided in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. that the U.S. Constitution does not require a physical presence in a taxing state in order for the state to impose a sales ...
Reed Smith
The Supreme Court's recent decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair reversed 50 years of precedent in holding that the physical presence standard for sales tax nexus is unsound and incorrect.
McDermott Will & Emery
July 16, 2018: Alysse McLoughlin is presenting "Federal Tax Changes & Implications to States" at the Southeastern Association of Tax Administrators Conference in Nashville, TN.
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
In a decision dated June 21 – South Dakota v. Wayfair – the Supreme Court held that no "physical presence" is required for a state to impose sales tax collection obligations on out-of-state vendors.
Morgan Lewis
New York, New Jersey, Maryland, and Connecticut are seeking to invalidate the new $10,000 cap on the federal deduction for state and local taxes ...
Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
If convenience wasn't reason enough for you to shop online, the sales tax saving probably was. Not anymore after Justice Kennedy's final majority opinion for the Supreme Court in the South Dakota v. Wayfair case.
Ropes & Gray LLP
On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court ruled in Wayfair that the State of South Dakota may constitutionally require large online retailers without actual physical presence in the state to collect and remit sales tax.
Ropes & Gray LLP
In this Ropes & Gray podcast, Brittany Cvetanovich, an associate in the tax group, is joined by Kat Gregor, tax partner and co-founder of the tax controversy group, to discuss a notable Supreme Court decision, South Dakota v. Wayfair.
Bowditch & Dewey
On June 21, the U.S. Supreme Court upended the online retail industry, giving states the power to force online retailers to collect sales tax from sales to consumers.
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
President Trump signed sweeping tax legislation into law on Dec. 22, 2017, resulting in several significant changes to the wealth transfer tax system, effective as of Jan. 1, 2018.
Reed Smith
The Pennsylvania Department of Revenue's Board of Appeals has issued about 45 orders remanding refund claims to the Bureau of Audits.
Reed Smith
The Supreme Court's recent decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair reversed 50 years of precedent in holding that the physical presence standard for sales tax nexus is unsound and incorrect.
Duane Morris LLP
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, passed by Congress and signed into law by President Trump at the end of 2017, overhauled the federal tax system.
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Welcome to the latest issue of New York Tax Insights.
Ropes & Gray LLP
In this Ropes & Gray podcast, Brittany Cvetanovich, an associate in the tax group, is joined by Kat Gregor, tax partner and co-founder of the tax controversy group, to discuss a notable Supreme Court decision, South Dakota v. Wayfair.
Bowditch & Dewey
On June 21, the U.S. Supreme Court upended the online retail industry, giving states the power to force online retailers to collect sales tax from sales to consumers.
Reed Smith
California briefly posted online a draft notice containing new use tax collection rules for retailers, indicating that it may imminently adopt use tax nexus thresholds similar to South Dakota's.
McDermott Will & Emery
On April 9, 2018, the New York State Supreme Court granted Starbucks' motion to dismiss claims that it had failed to collect more than $10 million of sales tax at its New York stores.
Morgan Lewis
New York, New Jersey, Maryland, and Connecticut are seeking to invalidate the new $10,000 cap on the federal deduction for state and local taxes ...
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Center (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with