Mondaq USA: Intellectual Property > Patent
Shearman & Sterling LLP
On October 18, 2017, the PTAB, which had previously declined to institute the IPR requested by the petitioner in General Plastic Industrial Co. v. Canon Kabushiki Kaisha ...
Jones Day
In Microsoft Corp. v. Biscotti, Inc., Nos. 2016-2080, -2082, -2083, 2017 WL 6613262 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 28, 2017)...
Ropes & Gray LLP
The Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) has designated the following decisions, which involve 35 U.S.C. § 315(b), as informative.
Foley & Lardner
Enforcing a patent with claims that raise the specter of divided infringement can be a difficult plight for patent owners.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
IPRs are often filed to challenge important patents – the same patents likely to be tested in litigation. In such circumstances, parties should pay careful attention when asserting arguments...
Shearman & Sterling LLP
The PTAB rules include a default protective order that provides a single-level confidentiality designation, allowing access to any filed confidential documents by the parties, as well as their ...
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Intellectual Property Newsletter 13 IPR Settlement Remains Difficult Although their name would suggest that inter partes reviews are proceedings between two private adversaries ...
Shearman & Sterling LLP
On January 8, 2018, in Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp., the Federal Circuit rendered an en banc decision holding that the PTAB's determination that a petition for inter partes review ...
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Inter partes review has, in a very short time, become a core part of patent litigation practice in the United States. In many cases it has replaced district-court litigation.
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
In Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corporation, an en banc panel of the Federal Circuit decided on January 8, 2018, that the PTAB's application of the 35 U.S.C § 315(b) ...
Womble Bond Dickinson
For nearly seven years, Radio World has turned to Womble Bond Dickinson's Bill Ragland to provide insight on the long-running MAD/DigiMedia patent infringement case.
Proskauer Rose LLP
Earlier this week, the Federal Circuit issued an en banc opinion in Wi-Fi One v. Broadcom that holds the PTAB's determinations of whether an IPR petition was timely filed under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) are appealable.
Jones Day
Complainants often must rely on indirect infringement to prove a violation of Section 337. Indirect infringement may be in the form of induced or contributory infringement.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
PTAB Decision: Ex parte McAward, Appeal No. 2015-006416 (PTAB, August 25, 2017 Background: The Office rejected claims to a "water leakage detector" under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as indefinite.
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Since the founding of our republic, the right to trial before an independent judge and an impartial jury has been fundamental.
Morgan Lewis
The Federal Circuit recently reversed course and expanded judicial review of PTAB institution decisions to include time-bar determinations...
WilmerHale
International arbitration provides, in theory, an attractive alternative to litigation for resolving cross-border intellectual property ("IP") disputes.
Foley & Lardner
In a recent article published by Bloomberg, we are once again reminded of the litigious nature of some of Silicon Valley's biggest players.
McDermott Will & Emery
In November 2017, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued Standard Operating Procedure 9, explaining the procedures it will use to address remands from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
McDermott Will & Emery
Wading into the merging streams of antitrust and patents, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld dismissal of an antitrust suit where a jury verdict in a parallel case found no patent infringement.
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Morgan Lewis
Amgen paints a different picture as to the bad actor during the parties' negotiations pursuant to the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act.
Ropes & Gray LLP
Scott McKeown, Ropes & Gray IP litigation partner and chair of the firm's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) group, discusses potential impacts of pending Supreme Court PTAB cases...
RPX Corporation
F2VS Technologies, Inc. has added two cases to the campaign that it began this past June, suing Acuity Brands (Acuity Brands Lighting) (1:17-cv-04774) and Daintree Networks (1:17-cv-01713).
Ropes & Gray LLP
Patent prosecutors navigate complex USPTO rules and seemingly esoteric examinational requirements to procure patent rights.
RPX Corporation
Computer Protection IP, LLC (CPIP) has filed its first affirmative lawsuit, accusing New Dream Network (DreamHost) (2:17-cv-08858) of infringing a single server security patent.
RPX Corporation
A patent infringement suit brought against Google by Personal Audio, LLC has been transferred from the Eastern District of Texas (1:15-cv-00350) to the District of Delaware (1:17-cv-01751) due to improper venue.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Succeeding in obtaining a ruling in an inter partes review petition at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board that issued patent claims are unpatentable, may not be enough to modify ...
Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh, Lindquist & Schuman, P.A.
Recently, the Federal Circuit reversed a jury decision upholding the validity of two Amgen patents directed to a large genus of antibodies that reduce LDL cholesterol.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Prodrugs are inactive compounds designed to be converted into pharmaceutically active metabolites following delivery to a patient.
Jones Day
On December 14, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit again interpreted the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act ("BPCIA").
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Center (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with