Mondaq USA: Intellectual Property > Patent
Jones Day
In another noteworthy year for patent law, the U.S. Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit issued several decisions that altered the patent landscape ...
Stites & Harbison PLLC
On January 7, 2019, the USPTO released updated guidance on how Patent Examiners should determine whether an invention is directed to subject matter that is eligible for patent protection
Fenwick & West LLP
Law360 reported that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the PTAB's decision that UCB Pharma GmbH's patent covering the drug Toviaz® was correctly upheld in an IPR challenge from...
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
On WIPO's website, there is a convenient chart that summarizes those Offices (or Authorities) which have Notified WIPO of Waiver(s) of the Power of Attorney Requirement under PCT Rule 90.4(b) and/or 90.5(a)(ii).
Jones Day
Both parties appealed.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) remains a popular venue of choice for patent owners seeking to stop the importation of goods that infringe on their patents.
Foley & Lardner
Manufacturers may assume that protection of their brands can only be achieved through trademark protection of names, logos, and slogans.
Mylan, Breckenridge, and Alembic appealed the PTAB's FWD upholding the validity of the reissued '551 claims.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Licensees moved to stay a patent infringement lawsuit pending resolution of a dispute over the license's covenant not to sue.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Through January 15, 2019, the Federal Circuit decided 466 PTAB appeals from IPRs and CBMs.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
In the wake of SAS Institute v. Iancu, the PTAB has sometimes expanded pending IPRs to include previously un-instituted grounds
Last week, the United States Senate Judiciary Committee announced the creation of a new subcommittee on intellectual property
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Since the passage of the America Invents Act in 2012, the solar industry has grappled with how best to deploy—and defend against—new inter partes review ("IPR")
Ropes & Gray LLP
Late last week, the Senate Judiciary Committee announced the formation of an Intellectual Property (IP) Subcommittee.
McDermott Will & Emery
The US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruled that for the purposes of honoring a fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) commitment ...
Foley & Lardner
In Athena Diagnostics, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Servs., LLC, the Federal Circuit once again held diagnostic method claims invalid under 35 USC § 101.
In Athena Diagnostics, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Servs., LLC, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling that claims covering methods for diagnosing neurological disorders by detecting autoantibodies...
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
The Office pointed to the drafting history of the petitioner estoppel provision to support its views.
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
In affirming the PTAB, the Federal Circuit also assumed for the purposes of its decision that compound 31 was an appropriate lead compound.
Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff, Stuebing Automatic Machine Co. ("Stuebing") filed a motion for violation of multiple discovery orders against the defendant.
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Duane Morris LLP
In 2014, Elon Musk announced that he was "open-sourcing" Tesla's patents.
Partners Carl Hittinger and Jeffry Duffy authored an article published by The Legal Intelligencer on July 27, 2018.
Cooley LLP
As 2019 kicks off, the Cooley antitrust group highlights 10 recent developments and trends corporate counsel should be aware of – from the US Supreme Court and lower courts, the DoJ and FTC ...
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
Further information regarding any adjustments to the USPTO's operating status will be posted on the USPTO website and delivered to the news media.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
The nature of patent litigation in the cybersecurity industry is likely to change very soon. Non-practicing entities, sometimes called "patent trolls," started some time ago to sue for patent
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Decision: Duncan Parking Tech., Inc. v. IPS Group, Inc., --F.3d__, 2019 WL 386013 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 31, 2019) (LOURIE, Dyk, and Taranto)
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
They are structurally identical to the ends of DNA strands found in nature." Id. at 10-11
Ropes & Gray LLP
So I mean, a patent litigation can be very expensive running through trial, running into multiple millions of dollars.
Proskauer Rose LLP
On December 20, 2018, the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") and the Department of the Treasury (the "Treasury") ...
Squire Patton Boggs LLP
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has been a consistent punching bag for the Supreme Court over the past ten or so years.
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Center (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
In association with