Mondaq Asia Pacific: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration > Trials & Appeals & Compensation
Law In Order
This article outlines the procedure for preparing Appeal Books for general matters in the Federal Court.
King & Capital Law Firm
《民法总则》第110条规定:"法人、非法人组织享有名称权、名誉权、荣誉权等权利。"对企业来说,法人的名誉权包含着外界对该企业的经营状况
King & Capital Law Firm
鉴定意见是指鉴定人在诉讼活动中运用科学技术或者专门知识对案件中涉及的专门性问题进行鉴别和判断或得出的意见,似乎具有较强的科学
King & Capital Law Firm
"民营企业家财产权保护"这一话题是当事人和刑辩律师心中共同的"痛点",因为这里面的问题之多、困难之多,大家都深有体会。从法律规范看,
King & Capital Law Firm
2018年4月,王九川律师接受委托为黄某涉嫌受贿案犯罪嫌疑人黄某辩护。
King & Capital Law Firm
近日,由北京市京都律师事务所杨大民律师、彭吉岳律师担任辩护人的,原铁道部某部主任、原北京铁路局局长涉嫌受贿罪、巨额财产来源不
King & Capital Law Firm
  为使整个社会崇尚法律,律师有责任使法律更值得崇尚,这个努力的过程就是使法律公平地适用于个案中。
King & Capital Law Firm
北京市京都律师事务所代理的原告杨紫女士与被告史某琴(微博账号"网红趣闻")名誉权纠纷一案,已于2019年8月7日由北京市海淀区人民法院作出
STA Law Firm
In the ongoing case of Dickson Valora Group (Holdings) Co Ltd and another vs Fan Ji Qian [2019] HKCFI 482, the Court was looked with a notable application...
STA Law Firm
Prosecuting in Hong Kong to implement one's rights and privileges can be costly. Against this scenery, can an offended party of limited financial...
Gall
The parent of a child born out of wedlock may make a claim for child maintenance pursuant to s.10 of the Guardianship of Minors Ordinance (Cap. 13) ("GMO").
Gall
International Arbitration Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of Hong Kong, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries
DLA Piper
The Prevention of Bribery Ordinance (Cap. 201) (POBO), enacted in 1971, is the primary anti-bribery legislation in Hong Kong and is enforced by the Independent
Maples Group
In Zhang Hong Li & Ors v DBS Bank (Hong Kong) Limited & Ors, FAMV 126/2018 (26 April 2019), the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal granted leave to the defendants to appeal against the judgment ...
Dhaval Vussonji & Associates
By a judgment dated 9th October, 2018 in the matter of Sushil Kumar Agarwal vs. Meenakshi Sandhu and Ors. [2018 (13) SCALE 778], the Hon'ble Supreme Court, relying on provisions of Section 14 (3) (c) ...
Khaitan & Co
Guided by established principles of Common Law that view damages as the presumptive remedy and specific performance as an alternate, discretionary remedy, the Specific Relief Act 1963 has sought to protect civil and ...
AZB & Partners
The recent ruling of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, New Delhi (Appellate Tribunal) in the matter of Jaipur IPL Cricket Private Limited and Ors. v. The Special Director Directorate ...
LexOrbis
Rushing to get ex party injunction remained the first salvo in the hands of the patentee in India. Section 108(1) allows courts to give relief in suit for infringement inter alia grant
Vaish Associates Advocates
R. Subramanian v. The Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement Decided by the High Court of Madras reported at MANU/TN/5918/2018
Vaish Associates Advocates
In fact it is in anticipation of prosecution that attachment proceedings are initiated.
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
L&L Partners
The object of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("CrPC/ Code") is to provide machinery for the punishment of offenders against the substantive criminal law.
Khaitan & Co
The Hon'ble Supreme Court (SC), in its recent decision in the matter of M/s Hindon Forge Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v State of Uttar Pradesh [(Civil Appeal No 10873 of 2018 along with Civil Appeal No 10874 of 2018)] ...
M Mulla Associates
In practice, more often than not, in a dispute over title of a land/property, it is seen that the parties assert their title by placing reliance upon their name being reflected in the revenue records.
Khaitan & Co
The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) in its judgment, in M/s SCG Contracts India Pvt. Ltd. v. K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. held that the failure to file written statements within the statutory time period ...
M Mulla Associates
Recently, the Supreme Court of India in its judgment dated 6th February, 2019 in the matter Bir Singh v. Mukesh Kumar [Criminal Appeal Nos. 230-231 of 2019 in SLP (Criminal) Nos. 9334-35 of 2018] ...
Khaitan & Co
In Gurudwara Sahib, the plaintiff, inter alia, sought a declaration that he had acquired title of the suit property by way of adverse possession.
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co
Recently, a Division Bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Justice MR Shah in Sau. Kamal Shivaji Pokarnekar v. The State of Maharashtra, held that criminal complaints cannot be quashed ...
LexOrbis
In India, persons are not permitted to take forcible possession.
Khaitan & Co
In the present case, two appeals with the same question of law were tagged together.
Vaish Associates Advocates
At this stage, the accused is summoned by the Court of the Magistrate to face the trial.
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter