Canada: Review of the Latest ABA Study on Private Mergers and Acquisitions

Last Updated: April 12 2010
Article by Diane Bertrand

On December 23, 2009, the American Bar Association (the "ABA") published the 2009 Private Target Mergers and Acquisitions Deal Point Study1, its latest analysis of the principal terms and conditions of acquisition agreements of private targets by public companies. The study analyses the terms and conditions of transactions completed in 2008 in the U.S. (the study will hereinafter be referred to, as the "2008 U.S. Study") The ABA had conducted similar studies for U.S. transactions completed in 2004 and 2006 and a comparable analysis of Canadian transactions completed in 2005 - 2006.

These publications provide a wealth of fascinating information for M&A practitioners; they have been widely disseminated and regularly influence ongoing acquisition negotiations.

The objective of this note is to highlight significant changes between the study of American transactions in 2006 and in 2008 and to discuss new issues which were tackled by the 2008 U.S. Study. It also reviews some of the interesting differences between the U.S. and Canadian practices.

The full text of the studies can be obtained from the ABA or by sending a request to Diane Bertrand at



Overall, there are few major differences between the 2008 U.S. Study and the previous American study. The burgeoning recession does seem to have triggered significant changes in industry practices. What the 2008 U.S. Study demonstrates is greater caution on the part of purchasers by tightening of existing practices (for instance, increased use of carve outs to indemnification limitations). However, the M&A practice in 2008 in the U.S. did not reveal fundamental changes in attitudes that a full blown recession would be expected to have (such as, for example, greater use of earnout provisions).

The 2008 U.S. Study also examined a few deal points not previously analysed which bring additional depth to this already comprehensive study of M&A practice in the U.S.


  • In 2008, the U.S. experienced the beginning of an economic recession; previous ABA studies were conducted in economic environments experiencing significant GDP growth (3.5% in 2004 and 2.7% in 2006)2.

Post Closing Adjustments to Purchase Price

  • More transactions contained adjustment provisions (from 68% to 79%); 
  • the pre-dominance of the working cap adjustment increased (77% instead of 69%); 
  • for most transactions, the working cap adjustment is the sole adjustment but there is an increase in the use of 2 or more adjustments (from 29% to 38%); 
  • increase in adjustments provisions based on debt (from 20% to 29%) and cash (from 13% to 19%) and decrease in adjustments based on assets (from 15% to 6%) and earnings (from 4% to 2%); 
  • (New!)3 in about 15% of the transactions containing a working cap adjustments, the definition of "working cap" excluded current tax assets and current tax liabilities; 
  • small increase in the rare practice of applying a threshold to the payment of post closing adjustments (from 10% to 15%); 
  • increase in the use of earnouts provisions but the practice is still limited (from 19% to 29%s); 
  • earnouts are still most commonly based on earnings (32%) and revenues (29%) but it is quite frequent to use some kind of operational milestone (26%); 
  • (New!) length of the earnout period: more than half of earnout adjustments cover a period of 2 years or less (52.1%) but a significant number of earnout provisions last more than five years (8.7% of transactions with earnouts); 
  • important increase in the number of transactions which provide for the acceleration of the payment of the earnout upon a change of control of the target (from 11% to 33%); 
  • (New!) there is a small trend to include provisions that specify that (i) the earnout is not an "ownership interest" of the seller and (ii) it does not create a fiduciary duty for the purchaser (6% in both cases).


  • (New!) There is normally a duty to update the representations and warranties up to closing (69%); interestingly, the study finds that in 81% of the transactions, the purchaser's right to indemnification is not limited for updated matters; 
  • (New!) most transactions include an exclusivity provision (86%).

Representations and Warranties

  • Increase in the rare practice of requesting a confirmation at closing that the representations formulated at signing were true in all respects (i.e. without a qualifier) (from 2% to 8%); 
  • representations still generally last 18 months in the U.S.; however, more transactions use an 18-month period (from 34% to 38%) or between 12 to 18 months (from 9% to 12%) and less transactions use a 12-month period (from 26% to 20%); 
  • the same issues are being carved out of the survival limitations as in previous studies but there is a general trend to carve issues out more often.

Legal Opinion

  • Decrease in the requirement to deliver legal opinion of target's counsel at closing (from 70% to 58%)4.

Merger Deals

  • (New!) 57% of transactions include a condition based on appraisal rights (known as "dissent rights" in Canada); generally the condition states that closing may not occur if a certain percentage of holders exercise their appraisal right.


  • Slight change in the value of the basket: the majority of transactions used to set the basket value below 0.5% of the transaction value (62%); now, the basket is as likely to be below 0.5% (44%) as between 0.5% and 1% (45%); 
  • it is becoming more common to carve issues out of the basket; 
  • slight increase in the practice of identifying a $ threshold per claim (it is still a fairly rare practice) (from 18% to 23%); 
  • having an indemnification cap lower than the purchase price is still a strong practice (86% of transactions have a cap lower than a purchase price); 78% of the transactions have an indemnification cap below 25% of the purchase price; only in 4% of the transactions is the cap equal to the purchase price; 
  • it is becoming more common to carve issues out of the indemnification cap; 
  • increase in the number of transactions which use indemnification as the exclusive remedy (from 77% to 85%); 
  • slight decrease in transactions which include an escrow (from 89% to 81%); fairly often, it is the exclusive remedy (33% of transactions); 
  • the escrow value is still normally between 7% and 15% of the purchase price (59%), but more transactions have a 7% to 10% escrow (from 14% to 27%) and less transactions are below 7% (from 38% to 26%).

Dispute Resolutions

  • Slight increase in use of mediation or arbitration mechanisms (from 31% to 35%) but there is a decreased interest in using mediation then binding arbitration (from 18% to 3%).


The following table is based on the 2008 U.S. Study and the similar ABA study conducted on Canadian transactions implemented 2005 and 20065. It highlights major trends and differences between the U.S. and Canadian M&A practice. Note that only selected results from both studies are shown below and, generally, only the most frequent options have been retained. The reader should refer to the actual studies for a more complete comparative study.




Transactions in which year?



GDP growth6

3% - 2.9%


Post closing adjustments?

yes (63%)

yes (79%)

Working cap adjustment?

yes (55%)

yes (77%)

Next most common adjustment?

other milestone (48%)

debt (29%) or
other milestone (26%)

Estimate of adjustment on closing date?

no (69%)

yes (76%)

Adjustment needs to exceed threshold to trigger payment?

no (95%)

no (85%)

Who prepares closing statements?

seller (45%)

buyer (83%)

Separate escrow for adjustment to purchase price?

no (79%)

no (80%)

Is there an earnout?

no (90%)

no (71%)

If earnout, based on what?

Earnings / EBITDA (33%)
Criteria other than revenue or combination (33%)

Earnings / EBITDA (32%)
Criteria other than revenue or combination (26%)

How long is the earnout period?


2 years + less (52.1%)
3 years + less (69.5%)
more than 5 years (8%)

Is earnout accelerated upon change of control?

yes (86%)

no (54%)

Is "Material Adverse Effect" defined?


yes (92%)

Does the definition include ...8


"prospects": no (62%)
"$ value": no (98%)
"carve outs": yes (79%)

Is "knowledge" defined?


knowledge (68%)
actual knowledge (25%)

Are specific persons identified?


yes (91%)

Is there a covenant to update for breaches of reps?


yes (69%)

Is indemnification of purchaser limited for updated matter?


no (81%)

Is there an exclusivity undertaking?


yes (86%)

At closing, is there a declaration that the reps were true as of the execution date?

no (79%)

yes (66%)

Are the reps qualified at closing?

yes (51%)

yes (92%)

Is a target legal opinion required?

yes (72%)

yes (58%)

Survival of reps?

24 months (37%)
18 months (19%)
12 months (19%)

18 months (38%)
12-18 months (12%)
12 months (20%)

Carve outs to survival of reps?


yes, more issues,
more often

Type of basket

first dollar (32%)
deductible (21%)
combination (13%)

deductible (47%)
first dollar (36%)
combination (12%)

Baskets as % of transaction value

0.25% - 0.5% (31%)
less than 0.25% (26%)

0.5 - 1% (45%)
less than 0.5% (44%)

Basket carve outs


yes, more issues,
more often

Is there an eligible claim threshold?

no (73%)

no (77%)

Cap to indemnification?

no provision (44%)
equal to price (29%)
less than price (20%)

less than price9 (86%)
equal to price (4%)
no provision (8.7%)

Carve outs to indemnification cap?


yes, more issues,
more often

Is indemnification the exclusive remedy?

yes (54%)

yes (85%)

Is there an escrow?

no (71%)

yes (81%)

Is the escrow the exclusive remedy for claims?

no (84%)
yes (0%)

no (48%)
yes (33%)

Escrow as % of transaction value?

5% - 10% (23%)10
10 - 25% (23%)
25 - 50% (23%)

7 - 10% (27%)
10% (16%)
10 - 15% (16%)


1. A project of the M&A Market Trends Subcommittee of the Mergers & Acquisitions Committee of the ABA Business Law Section.

2. International Monetary Fund – 2009 World Economic Outlook, Gross Domestic Products, constant prices.

3. (New!) indicates an issue which was not analysed in previous ABA studies.

4. Note that the study does not track opinions required or delivered outside of the transaction agreement.

5. 2008 Canadian Private Target Mergers & Acquisitions Deal Point Study (v1), a project of the Mergers & Acquisitions Market Trends Subcommittee of the Committee on Mergers and Acquisitions of the American Bar Association's Section of Business Law.

6. International Monetary Fund – 2009 Word Economic Outlook, Gross domestic product, constant prices.

7. Not available : the Canadian study did not cover this issue.

8. Other criteria were also examined in the 2008 U.S. Study.

9. 78% of transactions have a cap of less than 25% of the purchase price.

10. Note that in Canada, the sampling of transactions on this issue was very small and may not be representative.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions