Canada: The Injured & The Restless: Principles Of Contractual Interpretation Leave Insured With An Uphill Battle For Mattress Coverage

Last Updated: July 16 2019
Article by Sara E. Hart and David Cowley-Salegio

Interpreting Contracts

The general principles of contractual interpretation require a decision-maker to read the contract before them as a whole, giving the words used their ordinary and grammatical meaning, in a manner consistent with the surrounding circumstances known to the parties at the time of formation of the contract.  While remaining faithful to the actual language of a contract and without deviating from those words, the decision-maker may consider surrounding circumstances (often called the "factual matrix") to aid in contractual interpretation.

Standard Form Contracts Are Unique

These principles are set out by the Supreme Court of Canada (the "Supreme Court") in Creston Moly Corp v Sattva Capital Corp,1 and they apply broadly.  However, subsequent to Sattva, courts disagreed on whether the interpretive principles articulated in that decision also applied to standard form contracts—some appellate courts said they did, some said they did not.  As a result, two years later, the Supreme Court clarified in Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co2 that standard form contracts (e.g. insurance contracts) are unique and must be treated as an exception to the general principles from Sattva.  The Court in Ledcor observed that the interpretation of standard form contracts has precedential value, since the same language will appear in similarly worded contracts across jurisdictions, and there is no meaningful factual matrix that is specific to the parties that could assist with the interpretation process.

Interpreting Insurance Contracts

As such, insurance contracts have their own unique set of interpretive principles that differ in meaningful ways from the general principles of contractual interpretation applicable at large.  The principles that apply to insurance contracts were summarized by the Supreme Court in Progressive Homes Ltd v Lombard General Insurance Co of Canada:3

  1. When the language of the policy is unambiguous, the court should give effect to clear language, reading the contract as a whole.
  2. Where the language of the policy is ambiguous, the court should:
    1. prefer interpretations that are consistent with the reasonable expectations of the parties, so long as such an interpretation can be supported by the text of the policy;
    2. avoid interpretations that would give rise to an unrealistic result or that would not have been in the contemplation of the parties at the time the policy was concluded; and
    3. strive to ensure that similar insurance policies are construed consistently.
  3. If and when the above rules fail to resolve the ambiguity, the court should construe the policy contra proferentem, i.e., against the insurer, with the corollary that coverage provisions are interpreted broadly and exclusion clauses narrowly.4

The cumulative result of these Supreme Court decisions is a firm and established interpretive framework within which courts will determine the meaning of provisions in standard form contracts of insurance.

An Alberta Case

Alberta's Standard Automobile Policy, the SPF 1, is such a standard form contract.  It is not negotiated between parties on a clause-by-clause basis, as, in fact, content is stipulated by provincial legislation.  More specifically, section 573 of Alberta's Insurance Act5 enables the Automobile Accident Insurance Benefits Regulation,6 which in turn provides the specific language for Section B Accident Benefits ("Section B") of the SPF 1. 

A recent Alberta decision puts the interpretive framework for insurance contracts into practice with respect to a provision of Section B.

In Rahall v Intact Insurance Company,7 the Plaintiff, Mohamed Rahall ("Mr. Rahall"), sued the Defendant, Intact Insurance Company ("Intact") on the basis of the latter's refusal to pay for an Intellibed Mattress (the "mattress").  The claim centered on the interpretation of provision 1(b) of subsection 1 of Section B of the SPF 1, which reads:

(1) In respect of...

(b) injuries...
all reasonable expenses incurred within 2 years from the date of the accident as a result of those injuries for necessary medical, surgical, chiropractic, dental, hospital, psychological, physical therapy, occupational therapy, massage therapy, acupuncture, professional nursing and ambulance services and, in addition, for other services and supplies that are, in the opinion of the insured person's attending physician and in the opinion of the Insurer's medical advisor, essential for the treatment or rehabilitation of the injured person.

Mr. Rahall argued that Intact breached the terms of his SPF 1 policy, and he applied to amend his original claim to include a claim for bad faith against Intact.  At the same time, Intact applied for summary dismissal of the entire claim on the basis that it lacked merit.

In her decision, Judge Corbett reviewed the facts underlying the claim.  Mr. Rahall had been in a motor vehicle accident in October 2017 and, as a result, sustained personal injuries.  He was covered by his SPF 1 policy with Intact at the time and was accordingly entitled to Section B benefits.  In February 2018, Mr. Rahall contacted Intact to ask about coverage for the Mattress, which he intended to buy, and was told that coverage was limited to medical supplies that were essential to his rehabilitation, which the mattress was not.  Mr. Rahall indicated that he had a letter from his physician, Dr. Salem, to the contrary.  Intact persisted in its denial of coverage for the Mattress under Section B, and Mr. Rahall sued.  Intact then scheduled an appointment for Mr. Rahall with Dr. Greidanus, a certified independent medical examiner.  After assessing Mr. Rahall, Dr. Greidanus was of the opinion that Mr. Rahall would not need the mattress because his injuries from the accident had resolved, and the exam did not show any further impairments.

Arguably, on these facts, the writing was on the wall for Mr. Rahall, and his claim was bound to fail.  First, the policy wording is clear and unambiguous: Section B would only cover the mattress if both the insured's physician and the insurer's advisor were of the opinion that it was essential for the rehabilitation of the insured.  Although Dr. Salem opined that it was, Dr. Greidanus disagreed.  As the policy wording is conjunctive, requiring both opinions to be favourable, Mr. Rahall had failed to meet the plain requirements for coverage for the mattress.  Further, Mr. Rahall was up against a number of persuasive precedents that interpreted provisions that were substantially similar to provision 1(b). 

Judge Corbett reviewed the law as set out in Ledcor and Progressive Homes and, applying it to provision 1(b), found no ambiguity in its language.  After also considering the precedential case law on similar provisions, she concluded:

These authorities confirm my view that the Policy would only cover the mattress as 'essential for rehabilitation' by Dr. Salem if Dr. Greidanus agreed with that recommendation.  Dr. Greidanus did not agree with Dr. Salem that the mattress was 'essential' for Mr. Rahall's 'rehabilitation.'  In my view, there is no issue of merit requiring a trial. ... The policy clearly requires both Dr. Greidanus and Dr. Salem to agree on this point for the mattress to be covered.8

Granting Intact's application for summary dismissal, Judge Corbett then considered Mr. Rahall's application to amend his original claim to include a claim for bad faith.  Unfortunately for Mr. Rahall, his application to amend was denied.  Although there was no significant procedural impediment to the amendment, there was a substantial substantive one.  Judge Corbett found that, even though the breach of the duty of good faith is an independent cause of action, it could not exist without an underlying breach of the policy.  Therefore, because she had found that Intact did not breach the policy, she also held that there was no claim for bad faith.

The Challenge for Insureds

The decision in Rahall provides a good example of how the principles of contractual interpretation apply to standard form contracts of insurance.  It also illustrates the unique challenges that insureds face when arguing over coverage.  When compared to the interpretation of contracts generally, insureds in coverage disputes have fewer tools at their disposal with which to argue against the words written in their policy.  For instance, there is no real 'factual matrix' or 'surrounding circumstances' to consider while assessing the language of a contract and the intention of the parties—the policy wording dominates.  Further, the weight of precedent is high.  Courts have more persuasive (and potentially binding) judicial commentary at their disposal than may exist in other contexts.  Unfortunately for Mr, Rahall, the plain wording of provision 1(b) and the direction of decisions in similar cases positioned him for an uphill battle that he was not ultimately able to win.

Seem Unfair?

If this seems unfair, it is important to remember a few things.  For instance, the policy wording is legislated and comes from the Automobile Accident Insurance Benefits Regulation.  Through this legislation, insurers have been given the right to obtain their own advice on the matter and the right to play that legitimate advice as a trump card (though this is no carte blanche for issuing denials, as insurance contracts are contracts of utmost good faith).  In cases like these, insurers are entitled to the benefit of a right granted through clear policy language because, on the flip side, when policies contain unresolvable ambiguities, insurers will have to bear the burden of contra proferentem.


1 2014 SCC 53, 2014 CarswellBC 2267.

2 2016 SCC 37, 2016 CarswellAlta 1699.

3 2010 SCC 33, 2010 CarswellBC 2501.

4 Ibid at paras 22-24.

5 RSA 2000, c I-3.

6 Alta Reg 352/1972 as amended.

7 2019 ABPC 11, 2019 CarswellAlta 101.

8 Ibid at paras 73-74.

About Dentons

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions