Canada: Is De Novo The Answer? Land Use Appeal Procedures In Other Jurisdictions

Last Updated: March 21 2017
Article by Christie E. Gibson

Although Ontario is not unique in Canada for having an appeal body to address appeals of land use decisions, no other planning appeal body in Canada has the breadth of power of the Ontario Municipal Board ("OMB"). This broad authority has drawn criticism over the years, in part for its ability to overturn the decisions of elected officials. The Province has responded by once again proposing an overhaul of the institution, the matters that it governs, and the way in which it responds to particular issues.

The Ministry of Municipal Affairs released the Public Consultation Document in October 2016, highlighting the major reforms that have been proposed to the OMB. OBA Municipal Bar Executive member and Technology Liaison Isaac Tang wrote on the major highlights in an article posted on the OBA website on October 12.

A core element of the debate arising from the Province's proposed reform rests on whether the OMB power to hear matters should test the issues as though they were being heard for the first time (a de novo hearing), or whether an administrative review of the governmental body's decision is more appropriate. Many sophisticated planning systems exist in the English-speaking world where de novo is the standard approach on appeal, and they should be looked to to better understand the widespread nature of the de novo system and its roots in a myriad of legal systems, not just Ontario's. This paper offers an overview of the de novo nature courts and tribunals in Ireland, England, New Zealand, Australia, and Scotland.

Proposed Changes in Ontario

In 2015, a new section to the Planning Act changed the burden placed on the OMB and shifted the regime away from a truer de novo system to one where the OMB must "have regard to" decisions made by municipal council or an approval authority relating to the same planning matter. The Province has recommended stakeholders consider an OMB even further removed from the de novo system in its Public Consultation Document, and offers the following explanation:

If this were to occur, it would mean the OMB would focus on the validity of the decision under appeal instead of seeking the "best" decision. The decision of the approval authority (i.e., municipality or the province) would be central to the appeal in a way that it currently is not. This might be achieved in a number of ways, including:

  • requiring the OMB to review municipal/approval authority decisions on a standard of reasonableness. That means OMB hearings would examine whether the original decision was within a range of defensible outcomes within the authority of the municipality/approval authority.  If the decision is found to have been made within that range of outcomes, the OMB would not be able to overturn it
  • authorizing the OMB to overturn a decision made by a municipality/approval authority only if that decision does not follow local or provincial policies. This would mean that the Board would have to be convinced that the planning decision under appeal is contrary to local or provincial policies. Examples might include approvals of proposals for development in a flood prone area or a provincially significant wetland, or an official plan that does not meet the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe intensification targets.

It also suggests that this change would "give more weight to municipal and provincial decisions." Although the Province asks the reader open-ended, neutral questions about moving away from a de novo hearing structure, the simple consideration of the issue in the Public Consultation Document suggests that changes will be forthcoming.  

Other Jurisdictions

A surprising number of jurisdictions within the Commonwealth share some form of a de novo-based hearing structure. Although in some instances it appears one can opt into a de novo hearing or access a de novo structure in certain circumstances, in other instances the de novo structure features a prominent role at the heart of the jurisdiction's planning system.


In Ireland, the appeal process is fundamental to the planning system as a whole. Planning authorities' decisions are subject to independent review by the An Bord Pleanála which is a statutory and independent planning appeals body. In general, the board "is required to consider a proposed development afresh".

The An Bord Pleanála is explicit with its mandate: regardless of whether an issue has been raised by the planning authority, so long as it is relevant to the application it will be considered by the board. As such, the board goes a step further than the current Ontario regime in its commitment to de novo hearings.


In England, planning appeals are received and decided upon by the Planning Inspectorate, which also hears appeals on a de novo basis. A government guide sets out the intended appeals process before a Planning Inspector acting on behalf of the Secretary of State: 

The appeal will be determined as if the application for permission had been made to the Secretary of State in the first instance. This means that the Inspector (or the Secretary of State) will come to their own view on the merits of the application. The Inspector (or the Secretary of State) will consider the weight to be given to the relevant planning considerations and come to a decision to allow or refuse the appeal. As Inspectors (or the Secretary of State) are making the decision as if for the first time, they may refuse the permission on different grounds to the local planning authority.

England thus shares the same conviction as Ireland about de novo appeals, and appears to integrate the role of the Planning Inspectorate directly into the land use regime.

New Zealand

The Environment Court is a national and appellate court that allows appeals of primarily resource management decisions. Most of what the Environment Court hears involves appeals brought against decisions of local authorities, such as regional and district plans, resource consents, public works and projects, enforcement proceedings, declarations, abatement notices, land use applications, subdivision applications, and coastal, water, and discharge permits.

While the Environment Court is not bound by a council or other decision-making body's decision, it must have regard for the earlier decision, a direct parallel to the current regime in Ontario. The Environment Court considers matters afresh. The Environment Court is thus overtly categorized as a de novo body.

The Environment Court has issued a guide indicating the procedures it usually follows. As the Practice Note 2014 explains:

The Court usually conducts an appeal against a decision on an application for a resource consent or a permit as a completely fresh hearing. In the case of a directly referred application, the hearing will be the first occasion on which the evidence has been heard and been available for challenge by opposing parties. The Court will normally hear first the person who applied for the consent or permit – followed by the parties who support the grant. Then the Court will hear the parties who oppose the grant of the consent or permit.

Although questions about "the role of courts in encouraging institutions and building their capacity to make more sustainable decisions" have been ongoing for at least a decade, the structure of the court has nevertheless remained de novo. As such, the New Zealand Environment Court stands at least in this respect as a direct parallel to the OMB.


In Australia, planning matters are addressed at a state level. In the state of South Australia, the Environment, Resources and Development Court (the "ERD") deals with disputes and enforcement of laws relating to the development and management of land, the natural resources, and the natural and built environment. To that extent, it may be more representative of the jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Tribunals Ontario as a whole rather than simply the OMB. The ERD also offers de novo hearings, "which means it is a fresh or new look at all the issues in dispute." The otherwise well laid out public awareness material does not offer a lengthier statement along the lines of those offered by the regimes in England and Ireland, but it is clear nonetheless that the ERD is committed to the de novo system with few or no qualifications.


In Scotland, an appeal of a land use planning application is made to the Scottish Ministers, and similar to Ontario's regime, it does not involve "rais[ing] any new matters...that had not been available to council when it dealt with the application." As such, the role of the Scottish Ministers is explicitly to keep the land use regime in check from a legal perspective, rather than to play the role of an active participant in the planning process.

The exception to the judicial review nature of the Scottish Ministers is where a matter could not have been raised earlier or if there are exceptional circumstances. A Scottish government guide to the system notes that in the event plans are to be revised or something has changed that could lead the municipality to make a different decision it is worth considering, although not imperative, to submit a new application instead of pursuing an appeal. Parallels can easily be drawn to the current system in Ontario.

Moving Forward

It is undisputed that the purpose of land use planning should be to make improvements in land management rather than cause setbacks for land users. A perfect example of how challenging this broad objective can be when it comes to implementation is in South Africa, where the land use planning system is complicated by the history of apartheid and the context of land use management in different "race zones" which once existed.

The process of establishing an efficient land use planning tool is a large, long-term feat that can be time-consuming and frustrating for land users and municipal planning personnel alike. As the Province moves forward with its proposed OMB reform, we must keep in mind the overarching goals of land use planning infrastructure and the role we wish our own appellate body to play vis-a-vis municipal decision-makers.

That the de novo structure is not uncommon in land use planning regimes across the English-speaking world suggests that any shift away from this system should be measured and well informed. If the Province proposes a more appellate role for the OMB as a result of the consultation, this will signal a shift in the role of players in the land use planning regime. We would caution that if such a change is being heralded the shift be done with careful consideration to the success of administrative appeal regimes elsewhere, and that any shift in responsibility is appropriately responded to by municipalities.

Originally published by the OBA, December 19, 2016

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions