Canada: Mennillo V. Intramodal Inc. — Resigning As Director May Entail Forfeiting Shares

Last Updated: November 25 2016
Article by Andrea Jurenovskis (Articling Student) and Joel Reinhardt

In last Friday's decision regarding shareholder disputes, the majority of the Supreme Court of Canada in Mennillo v. Intramodal Inc., 2016 SCC 51 dismissed the oppression remedy appeal of a former shareholder, denying that the shareholder had a right to reverse a share transfer which did not comply with the Canada Business Corporations Act ("CBCA"). In so doing, the Court distinguished a breach of the formalities of the CBCA by the corporation from a proper claim of oppression by a shareholder and found that a private agreement with another shareholder – separate and apart from the corporation – resulted in the loss of shares upon resignation as director. A strongly-worded dissent by Justice Côté found that the breaches of formalities of the CBCA by the corporation undermined important principles of corporate law.

The Shareholdings

Like many start-up ventures, the parties in this case were friends who decided to go into business together. Mennillo agreed to finance the business and Rosati would contribute the operating expertise. Intramodal Inc. was incorporated in 2004 under the CBCA, both parties being named as directors and officers. Shares were issued: 49% for Mennillo and 51% for Rosati. Both the notices of subscription and the directors' resolutions were signed by Rosati alone. Throughout their business relationship the parties rarely complied with the formal requirements of the CBCA. Even substantial monetary advances from Mennillo to Rosati lacked any written formalities.

In May of 2005, for reasons contradicted by each party, Mennillo resigned his position with the company and asked to be removed as a director and officer. The corporation proceeded to give effect to his resignation as director and officer and to transfer his shares to Rosati. At a later date, Mennillo discovered that the business was running successfully and that his shares had been transferred. He objected and, ultimately, sought relief from the court through the oppression remedy.

Intramodal, for its part, was of the view that Mennillo not only resigned as a director but also as a shareholder by virtue of an agreement between Rosati and Mennillo that Mennillo's shares would continue to be held by him as long as he guaranteed all the debts of Intramodal. Once he removed himself as guarantor, his shareholdings also transferred to Rosati.

The Courts Below

At trial, Justice Poirier of the Québec Superior Court was faced with a highly contested evidentiary record. The dealings between the parties were not well recorded in the corporation's books, nor were many of the formalities of the CBCA followed such as resolutions of the directors, signatures on share certificates, and due diligence by the corporation in meeting its share capital requirements. All of the relevant agreements were made verbally and all of the relevant financial transactions were made in cash.

Justice Poirier found that Mennillo was not a credible witness. He largely accepted the evidence of Intramodal and dismissed the action, finding that the shares issued to Mennillo were conditional upon his guaranteeing the company's debts. Therefore, Mennillo ceased to be a shareholder upon his resignation as director and officer in May of 2005 and was a mere creditor of Rosati and Intramodal.

Mennillo appealed. The majority of the Québec Court of Appeal sided with Intramodal and dismissed the appeal on the basis that the trial judge, whose decision was based on key findings of fact, did not make any palpable and overriding error. The majority found that Mennillo was a shareholder whose resignation, coupled with the understanding between the parties, resulted in the retroactive cancellation of the issuance of the shares to Mennillo. In dissenting reasons, Justice Gagnon focussed on the breach of formalities by Intramodal and concluded that since the requirements of section 76 of the CBCA had not been satisfied, there could not have been a valid transfer of the shares from Mennillo to Rosati.

Reasons of the Supreme Court

The reasons of the majority of the Supreme Court focussed on the reasonable expectations of the parties in determining whether the trial judge's dismissal of the oppression claim should be upheld. The majority reasons, written by Justice Cromwell (Abella, Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon and Brown JJ concurring) noted that the test for the oppression remedy (following BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders, 2008 SCC 69) requires two conditions to be met. First, the claimant must show the expectations that he or she claims have been violated and that they were reasonable. Second, the claimant must show that those reasonable expectations were violated by conduct that was oppressive, unfairly prejudicial to or unfairly disregarding of his interests as a security holder. 

The majority accepted the trial judge's findings of fact and concluded that no palpable or overriding error was made regarding the agreement between Mennillo and Rosati that Mennillo's shares would transfer to Rosati upon his resignation as director and guarantor. Chief Justice McLachlin (with Justice Moldaver) concurred with the majority and agreed that there was no reasonable expectation on the part of Mennillo to remain a shareholder, after he resigned and requested that his relationship with Intramodal cease. There was no evidence to establish that Mennillo had a reasonable expectation that his involvement with Intramodal would continue. For that reason, the claim in oppression must fail and, contrary to the majority, Chief Justice McLachlin and Justice Moldaver considered it unnecessary to go further and determine whether there was an effective transfer of shares.

In finding no violation of a reasonable expectation, Justice Cromwell's reasons distinguished a breach of formalities of the CBCA from a breach of reasonable expectations rising to level of a right to relief from oppression. The latter right requires conduct by the corporation that rises to the level of "oppressive, unfairly prejudicial to or unfairly disregarding of the interests of any security holder". A mere failure to follow statutory formalities is insufficient to grant access to the oppression remedy. In support of this conclusion was the finding of fact made at trial that the transfer of shares occurred between Mennillo and Rosati, without the corporation being a party to the agreement.

However, Justice Cromwell's reasons also corrected the Court of Appeal's notion that Mennillo's shares were retroactively cancelled as a result of his resignation as a director. Justice Cromwell noted that an issuance of shares under the CBCA can only be cancelled if the corporation's articles are amended or the corporation reaches a formal agreement to purchase the shares, requiring the directors to pass a resolution, the shareholder to consent, and the tests of solvency and liquidity to be met. None of these conditions for cancellation existed in the case and, therefore, the Court of Appeal conclusion on that point was corrected.

Dissenting reasons by Justice Côté focussed on the principles of corporate law that underlie the formalities for share transfer and cancellation in the CBCA: (i) the principle of the legal personality of the corporation distinct from the shareholder(s) and (ii) the principle of maintenance of capital of the corporation. The closely-held nature of the corporation in this case increased the importance of these principles, according to Justice Côté, and the failure of the corporation to observe the formalities of the CBCA was itself a form of oppression.

Notes for Shareholders

This decision is an important caution for shareholders who have collateral agreements, whether written or unwritten, regarding their obligations as shareholders. If those collateral agreements are not discharged, or are rescinded or breached, a resulting forfeiture of share ownership may be upheld by the courts even in the face of breached statutory formalities. Further, a blanket oppression claim may not be sufficient to gain compensation for the loss of shares even when the corporate statute and articles are breached by the corporation. However, this decision also reiterates the need for corporations to ensure compliance with statutory formalities and the reasons of the majority of the Supreme Court leave open the right of shareholders to challenge conduct that does not comply with formalities, but falls short of oppression. Activist shareholders and their legal advisers in future cases will be well-advised not to rely solely on the oppression remedy and to advance any available claims in regard to specific statutory formality breaches and lead specific evidence of reasonable expectations under a claim for relief from oppression.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
7 Nov 2019, Seminar, Birmingham, UK

Providing content specifically tailored to the needs of GCs and Heads of Legal working in government organisations and their affiliates.

14 Nov 2019, Seminar, London, UK

Providing content specifically tailored to the needs of GCs and Heads of Legal working in government organisations and their affiliates.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions